I went through the exercise of building openjdk 7-8 on Windows and
concur it isn't trivial. But google helps and I found very the helpful
Volker's blogpost very quickly.
This problem should not be solved by adding extra pointer to
workarounds. The build system on Windows should work with the lat
Hello,
I've applied patch from JDK-8028407 and things started working properly.
Thank you,
Andrey
On 11/19/2013 07:31 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
The bug number for this 'j' issue in the hotspot adjust-mflags.sh
script is JDK-8028407
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028407
The email thre
Changeset: 20c72bec2707
Author:amurillo
Date: 2013-11-08 07:13 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/20c72bec2707
8028061: new hotspot build - hs25-b59
Reviewed-by: jcoomes
! make/hotspot_version
Changeset: 9d8b29a0548c
Author:mgerdin
Date: 2013-11-
Thanks to some offlist help: It's a runtime option, not a build option.
On 11/19/13 7:34 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> p.s. I tried the following on the configure but don't see any indication
> that this switch was used.
>
> --with-boot-jdk-jvmargs="-Xcheck:jni"
>
> On 11/19/13 7:30 PM, Pete Brunet wr
p.s. I tried the following on the configure but don't see any indication
that this switch was used.
--with-boot-jdk-jvmargs="-Xcheck:jni"
On 11/19/13 7:30 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> How do I get the jdk 8 build to use -Xcheck:jni?
How do I get the jdk 8 build to use -Xcheck:jni?
Hello,
Please review these changes to remove applet related demos from the
images and thereby
from the Solaris distributions. Note: at this time appletviewer is still
available in the distros,
as there are tests dependent on it.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8028645/webrev.0/
Thanks
Kum
Changeset: cc80c03c41e4
Author:vromero
Date: 2013-11-01 19:08 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/cc80c03c41e4
8027660: javac crash while creating LVT entry for a local variable defined in
an inner block
Reviewed-by: jjg
Contributed-by: vicente.rom...@ora
Changeset: ae5f2130c3b9
Author:sundar
Date: 2013-11-01 19:54 +0530
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/nashorn/rev/ae5f2130c3b9
8027700: function redeclaration checks missing for declaration binding
instantiation
Reviewed-by: jlaskey, lagergren
! src/jdk/nashorn/internal/co
Changeset: b99535e22efe
Author:mchung
Date: 2013-11-07 20:48 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/b99535e22efe
8027943: serial version of
com.sun.corba.se.spi.orbutil.proxy.CompositeInvocationHandlerImpl changed in
7u45
Reviewed-by: msheppar, alanb, lancea
!
Ok, but does this mean that no one is interested in fixing the "old" jdk7u
system?
(I posted an help message about [7u]: help on
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk and got no answer, while the fix I am
proposing will make the build in jdk7u easier by fixing this error "ERROR:
Trouble wi
Oh, I can't find the "I Like" button anywhere in the mailer :)
Cheers,
Mario
2013/11/18 Magnus Ihse Bursie
> So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed. The
> patch was just submitted to the tl forest, from where it will move to
> master in a few days.
>
> If you have per
On Nov 19 2013, at 09:26 , Francis ANDRE
wrote:
> Magnus
>
> By the way, what is exactly the old build system??? I am aware of the jdk7u
> build system,
Early in jdk8 development it used the same build system as jdk7. A new build
system was developed and eventually replaced the "old" build
Magnus
By the way, what is exactly the old build system??? I am aware of the jdk7u
build system, the jdk8 build system, but what is the old one?
Francis
Le 18/11/2013 19:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :
So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed. The patch
was just subm
The bug number for this 'j' issue in the hotspot adjust-mflags.sh script
is JDK-8028407
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028407
The email thread is here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-November/010941.html
Tim
On 11/19/13 07:58 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi An
Hi Andrey,
This is a known issue that I thought had been fixed - probably in build
forest and perhaps not in jdk8 master yet. It is an issue with the
adjust_flags.sh file and the specific version of make as I recall.
David
On 19/11/2013 10:53 PM, Andrey Panasyuk wrote:
The issue is related
The issue is related to the folder name where OpenJDK is cloned. If the
folder has lower case "j" letter in it the build fails.
In my case I've got.
/usr/bin/make: invalid option -- '8'
/usr/bin/make: invalid option -- '/'
/usr/bin/make: invalid option -- 'c'
In the case if jdk is cloned to the
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:03 +, Dave Pointon wrote:
> Hi Magnus ,
>
>
> I don't disagree - with the benefit of hindsight + invaluable insight
> provided by the group, I think that I am reading far too much into the
> problem I encountered whilst building, or attempting to build, the IBM
> va
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:03 +, Dave Pointon wrote:
> Hi Magnus ,
>
>
> I don't disagree - with the benefit of hindsight + invaluable insight
> provided by the group, I think that I am reading far too much into the
> problem I encountered whilst building, or attempting to build, the IBM
> va
Hi Magnus ,
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:15 +0100, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>
> I have a hard time believing it is a common problem that a JDK
> installation exists, where the executable permission is missing. So it's
> reasonable to have this as a last time check, and not as part of the
> alrea
This is an update to the "test sets" used by the build+test system used
in Oracle (and so not interesting for OpenJDK). It is basically a
refresh of the testsets so that it is simple to select a default, core,
svc, pit or all tests when submitting a job. I have already discussed
this update w
On 2013-11-18 21:28, David Holmes wrote:
MOre generally this seems solvable simply by changing the existing
error message to "an executable binary file for could not be
found" - and the user could see if it was missing or just not marked
executable. :)
I agree with David.
The solution
Hi,
On 11/19/2013 11:05 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote:
Hi Dalibor
Everybody at Oracle and may be elsewhere knows how difficult is the task
of building OpenJDK on WXP/W7. There was even in a previous OpenJDK
contest a proposal for making this windows build smoother... Thus, the
blog of Volker SIMONIS
On 2013-11-18 22:33, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Magnus,
is the msys build currently working (i.e. can I test it out of the box)?
I think otherwise it would be hard to get this right for msys (it took
me quite some time to get it right on Cygwin, so without a full
sucessfull build I wouldn't bet
Hi David ,
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 06:28 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 19/11/2013 1:34 AM, Dave Pointon wrote:
> >
>
> Minor style nit but note that the pattern used everywhere is x$FOO = x.
> So changing to use "j" or "r" is undesirable.
>
OK, TFT. It was merely an obviously m
25 matches
Mail list logo
