Hi Roman,
Commenting on the hotspot changes ...
On 8/01/2015 9:01 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi Erik,
I'm CC-ing hotspot-dev for review of Hotspot code related changes.
Yes, some additional changes to Hotspot are required. This is the full
set of changes needed to build and run Shark:
On 8/01/2015 9:05 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Oh and notice that if you try to build it yourself, use a version of
LLVM 3.5. In 3.5, C++11 is used/required, and OpenJDK doesn't support
C++11 yet. (are there any plans about this?) I'd recommend LLVM 3.4.2.
C++11? We still have workarounds for
Am Donnerstag, den 08.01.2015 um 21:20 +1000 schrieb David Holmes:
On 8/01/2015 9:05 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Oh and notice that if you try to build it yourself, use a version of
LLVM 3.5. In 3.5, C++11 is used/required, and OpenJDK doesn't support
C++11 yet. (are there any plans about
Hello Roman,
Thanks for the full patch!
I discovered a problem with the top repo patch. When autoconf (using m4)
evaluates your change, the brackets disappear. To fix this, more
brackets need to be added. Here is a version that works for me that will
make the correct sed expression appear in
On 01/08/2015 11:38 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Roman,
Thanks for the full patch!
I discovered a problem with the top repo patch. When autoconf (using m4)
evaluates your change, the brackets disappear. To fix this, more
brackets need to be added. Here is a version that works for me
On 01/08/2015 11:31 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
I guess for my purposes it's good enough to pass some GCC flag to turn
on C++11 support, so that the new LLVM headers can be used. That's all
that I need.
But does that work without further changes?
Andrew.
+1
On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:52 AM, A. Sundararajan
sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8068650/ for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068650
This issue was caused by another makefile fix to generate docs for nashorn.
Hello Roman,
This addition looks good to me.
Thinking about what the others said, it might be inconvenient to have
all this be pushed to different forests. I tried applying all the
changes to jdk9/hs-rt, but I can't seem to build zeroshark.. Did you
have more hotspot changes to be able to
Hi Erik,
I'm CC-ing hotspot-dev for review of Hotspot code related changes.
Yes, some additional changes to Hotspot are required. This is the full
set of changes needed to build and run Shark:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-hotspot/webrev.01/
In detail:
- In the Makefile fix
Oh and notice that if you try to build it yourself, use a version of
LLVM 3.5. In 3.5, C++11 is used/required, and OpenJDK doesn't support
C++11 yet. (are there any plans about this?) I'd recommend LLVM 3.4.2.
Roman
Am Donnerstag, den 08.01.2015 um 11:03 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
Hello
On 2015-01-08 12:54, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/08/2015 11:38 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I tried building locally (Ubuntu 14.04 with llvm 3.4) but it failed with
undefined references at link time:
/usr/lib/llvm-3.4/lib/libLLVMSupport.a(Process.o): In function
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-01-08 07:52, A. Sundararajan wrote:
Hi,
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8068650/ for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068650
This issue was caused by another makefile fix to generate docs for
nashorn. I'm cc'ing nashorn-dev and
Hello,
Please review this patch, which adds support for building with different
versions of Visual Studio and in particular adds support for VS2013. In
order to control which version to use, I've introduced a new configure
parameter --with-toolchain-version. On windows, this parameter will
Yes, I just found this out the hard way yesterday (and many other patches
are required too).
Is there any chance OS X fixes can make it upstream?
This basically requires backporting JDK-8043340 to jdk8u, which I've been
poking at here and there but have not had the time to really
14 matches
Mail list logo
