Re: RFR: 8079360 AttachProviderImpl could not be instantiated

2015-05-06 Thread [email protected]
Looks good. Thanks, Serguei On 5/6/15 11:51 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote: This is another library that needs to be compiled with -DPSAPI_VERSION=1 due to the recent Windows compiler upgrade. I have also fixed a better error message that prints the underlaying exception if something like this hap

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread David DeHaven
Odd, I thought we checked that location by default. A fix for Yosemite was added, but Mavericks should still work. -DrD- > p.s. make images ran with no problems. > > On 5/6/15 3:09 PM, Pete Brunet wrote: >> After installing XQuartz, thanks to the text at Problem #1 at >> http://mail.openjdk.jav

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Pete Brunet
p.s. make images ran with no problems. On 5/6/15 3:09 PM, Pete Brunet wrote: > After installing XQuartz, thanks to the text at Problem #1 at > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-October.txt > using these options worked > --with-freetype-include=/usr/X11/include/freetype2 > --wit

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Vadim Pakhnushev
That is, I downloaded freetype tarball from the freetype site and did 'sudo make install' in the extracted directory... On 06.05.2015 23:09, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote: My experience was that configure didn't find freetype even with the --with-freetype so I just did sudo make install and it found i

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Pete Brunet
After installing XQuartz, thanks to the text at Problem #1 at http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-October.txt using these options worked --with-freetype-include=/usr/X11/include/freetype2 --with-freetype-lib=/usr/X11/lib Pete On 5/6/15 2:49 PM, Pete Brunet wrote: > Thanks David,

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Vadim Pakhnushev
My experience was that configure didn't find freetype even with the --with-freetype so I just did sudo make install and it found it in the /usr/local Thanks, Vadim On 06.05.2015 22:49, Pete Brunet wrote: Thanks David, I have Xcode 6.1.1 and configure fails with "Could not find freetype! Thes

Re: RFR: 8079360 AttachProviderImpl could not be instantiated

2015-05-06 Thread Dmitry Samersoff
Staffan, Looks good for me. -Dmitry On 2015-05-06 21:51, Staffan Larsen wrote: > This is another library that needs to be compiled with -DPSAPI_VERSION=1 > due to the recent Windows compiler upgrade. > > I have also fixed a better error message that prints the underlaying > exception if somethi

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Pete Brunet
Thanks David, I have Xcode 6.1.1 and configure fails with "Could not find freetype! These sites http://blog.shelan.org/2015/03/how-to-build-open-jdk-9-on-mac-osx.html http://gvsmirnov.ru/blog/tech/2014/02/07/building-openjdk-8-on-osx-maverick.html say to install XQuartz, but that didn't help. BT

RFR: 8079360 AttachProviderImpl could not be instantiated

2015-05-06 Thread Staffan Larsen
This is another library that needs to be compiled with -DPSAPI_VERSION=1 due to the recent Windows compiler upgrade. I have also fixed a better error message that prints the underlaying exception if something like this happens again. webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8079360/webrev.00/

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread David DeHaven
Correct, --with-xcode-path is for jdk8u only as it requires building with Xcode 4. For jdk9 use the Xcode 5.1 or later. The Xcode 6.3 patch is in hotspot, it will be integrated to dev hopefully in the near future. In the meantime you can apply the patch to your local workspace. Or, if you hav

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Vadim Pakhnushev
Pete, I think that you should build JDK 9 with the latest Xcode. With Xcode 6.3 this fix is needed (not yet integrated into the 9-dev) https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077364. Thanks, Vadim On 06.05.2015 16:53, Pete Brunet wrote: Maybe it's because now I am using the 9 repo: $ bash

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Pete Brunet
Maybe it's because now I am using the 9 repo: $ bash ./configure --with-xcode-path=/Applications/Xcode\ 4.6.3.app/ 2>&1 | tee configure.log Running generated-configure.sh configure: error: unrecognized options: --with-xcode-path configure exiting with result code 1 On 5/6/15 7:51 AM, Vadim Pakhnu

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Vadim Pakhnushev
Hi Pete, How is that? I haven't tried this lately, but I just pulled 8u-dev sources and the option is there: $ sh configure --help --with-xcode-path explicit path to Xcode 4 (generally for building on 10.9 and later) Thanks, Vadim On 06.05.2015 15:39, Pet

Re: MacOSX, jdk8u-dev build break, getting Xcode 4.6.3 set up for Maveriks 10.9.5

2015-05-06 Thread Pete Brunet
Hi Vadim, I had to defer from this for a while but am back at it. Apparently --with-xcode-path isn't currently a valid option. Pete On 4/7/15 10:22 AM, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote: > Pete, have you tried > sh configure --with-xcode-path=/Applications/Xcode\ 4.6.3.app/ > ? > It seems that the configur

Re: RFR: 8079345: After 8079248 fixed JDK still fails with "jdk\\bin\\management_ext.dll: The specified procedure could not be found"

2015-05-06 Thread [email protected]
This looks good. It is better with the moved comment. Thanks, Serguei On 5/6/15 4:29 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote: On 6 maj 2015, at 11:46, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2015-05-06 11:39, Erik Joelsson wrote: This one looks better. Sorry for not spotting the problem in the previous review. /Er

Re: RFR: JDK-8078046 Remove MCS post-processing on Solaris

2015-05-06 Thread David Holmes
On 6/05/2015 8:31 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2015-04-17 12:18, David Holmes wrote: Hi Magnus, On 17/04/2015 7:18 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: We should remove the MCS post-processing on Solaris. The msc command is used to post-process the binaries on Solaris, with the intent of adding

Re: RFR: 8079345: After 8079248 fixed JDK still fails with "jdk\\bin\\management_ext.dll: The specified procedure could not be found"

2015-05-06 Thread Staffan Larsen
> On 6 maj 2015, at 11:46, Magnus Ihse Bursie > wrote: > > On 2015-05-06 11:39, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> This one looks better. Sorry for not spotting the problem in the previous >> review. >> >> /Erik >> >> On 2015-05-06 11:24, Staffan Larsen wrote: >>> My fix for 8079248 was broken, so here

Re: RFR: JDK-8078046 Remove MCS post-processing on Solaris

2015-05-06 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2015-04-17 12:18, David Holmes wrote: Hi Magnus, On 17/04/2015 7:18 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: We should remove the MCS post-processing on Solaris. The msc command is used to post-process the binaries on Solaris, with the intent of adding the version number. Post-processing of binaries i

Re: RFR: 8079345: After 8079248 fixed JDK still fails with "jdk\\bin\\management_ext.dll: The specified procedure could not be found"

2015-05-06 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2015-05-06 11:39, Erik Joelsson wrote: This one looks better. Sorry for not spotting the problem in the previous review. /Erik On 2015-05-06 11:24, Staffan Larsen wrote: My fix for 8079248 was broken, so here is a new attempt. I intend to push this directly to jdk9/hs since that is where 8

Re: RFR: 8079345: After 8079248 fixed JDK still fails with "jdk\\bin\\management_ext.dll: The specified procedure could not be found"

2015-05-06 Thread Erik Joelsson
This one looks better. Sorry for not spotting the problem in the previous review. /Erik On 2015-05-06 11:24, Staffan Larsen wrote: My fix for 8079248 was broken, so here is a new attempt. I intend to push this directly to jdk9/hs since that is where 8079248 was pushed. bug: https://bugs.open

RFR: 8079345: After 8079248 fixed JDK still fails with "jdk\\bin\\management_ext.dll: The specified procedure could not be found"

2015-05-06 Thread Staffan Larsen
My fix for 8079248 was broken, so here is a new attempt. I intend to push this directly to jdk9/hs since that is where 8079248 was pushed. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079345#comment-13638237 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8079345/webrev.00