Hi Vladimir,
This webrev contains all the changes to hotspot needed for the port:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166730-linuxs390-all/hotspot.wr01/
It includes
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166560-basic_s390/hotspot.wr03/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166561-basic_C
On 2016-10-04 13:20, Erik Joelsson wrote:
New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8150736/webrev.02/
Looks great. Ship it! :)
/Magnus
On 2016-10-04 11:03, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2016-10-03 10:22, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
On 2016-10-01 14:13, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 2016-10-04 11:30, Erik Joelsson wrote:
That was intended but I discovered that the whole thing was wrong. The
default strip flag we use on Linux "-g" and the new flag we set for
minimal "--strip-unneeded" are the mutually exclusive, so whatever
ends up last on the command line wins. Since th
New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8150736/webrev.02/
On 2016-10-04 11:03, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2016-10-03 10:22, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
On 2016-10-01 14:13, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Erik,
This is a big change that is hard to digest. I assume the actual
images themse
Very nice. Thank you for implementing this.
Leonid
On 04.10.2016 12:42, Erik Helin wrote:
On 2016-09-30, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
Hi
I think that it would be better to split this test into 4 tests. Currently
this test is going to be skipped if any specific GCare set. Or it could even
fail if any
On 2016-09-30, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think that it would be better to split this test into 4 tests. Currently
> this test is going to be skipped if any specific GCare set. Or it could even
> fail if any G1 specific options is set without setting G1 explicitly.
>
> So there is no way to
That was intended but I discovered that the whole thing was wrong. The
default strip flag we use on Linux "-g" and the new flag we set for
minimal "--strip-unneeded" are the mutually exclusive, so whatever ends
up last on the command line wins. Since the new flag is an override, we
should treat
On 2016-10-03 10:22, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
On 2016-10-01 14:13, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Erik,
This is a big change that is hard to digest. I assume the actual
images themselves are unaffected by this change?
I understand that and I have been working on this for some time in the
backg
On 3/10/2016 6:22 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
On 2016-10-01 14:13, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Erik,
This is a big change that is hard to digest. I assume the actual
images themselves are unaffected by this change?
I understand that and I have been working on this for some time in the
backgr
Hi Erik,
On 3/10/2016 11:53 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
(adding hotspot-dev)
On 2016-10-03 15:52, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Please review this small change, which adds --strip-unneeded when
stripping the minimal VM on Linux, which reduces size on x86 builds
with around 1.2MB.
Bug: https://bu
On 2016-10-03 15:52, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Please review this small change, which adds --strip-unneeded when
stripping the minimal VM on Linux, which reduces size on x86 builds
with around 1.2MB.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164120
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/
On 2016-09-30 16:06, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
I missed adding a dependency for the cross compilation case. The
change is in Main.gmk, adding the line:
+ buildtools-modules: create-buildjdk
New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8166948/webrev.02/
Looks good to me.
/Magnus
Hi Martin,
On 30/09/2016 8:03 PM, Martin Walsh wrote:
On 23/09/2016 14:34, Martin Walsh wrote:
On 20/09/2016 08:42, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
On 2016-09-20 03:28, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Martin,
Build changes must be reviewed by the build team - now cc'd
Thanks for forwarding David, I c
13 matches
Mail list logo
