I think that this has always waited until *at least* that previous JDK
is GA.
If you think about it there isn't really any such thing as JDK 9 (or at
least Java SE 9)
until then so it has to be so. Thus ask this again in August.
-phil.
On 1/25/17, 9:36 PM, joe darcy wrote:
And do we also nee
Hi David,
On 1/25/2017 8:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Joe,
Changes look okay. So does javac already handle arbitrary
source/target values?
I'm working on the changeset for that. I need to make sure all the
langtools tests pass before getting it out for review.
We need the usual set of
Hi Joe,
Changes look okay. So does javac already handle arbitrary source/target
values?
We need the usual set of "new release" updates to change JDK version as
well. Where does that hide these days ??
And do we also need to update the boot JDK to be JDK 9?
What else is needed for a new rel
Hello,
With the opening of the JDK 10 forests, the build should be updated to
use the new source and target options (JDK-8028546:
Add -source 10 and -target 10 to javac)
Please review the changes for
JDK-8173383: Update JDK build to use -source and -target 10
http://cr.openjdk.java.ne
> On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Mike Burton wrote:
>
> Platform is Ubuntu 14.04, error message below:
>
> === Output from failing command(s) repeated here ===
> * For target hotspot_variant-server_libjvm_gtest_objs_BUILD_GTEST_LIBJVM_link:
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/libstdc+
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 7:34 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> Hi Kim,
>
> On 25/01/2017 7:25 AM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> On Jan 23, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Mike Burton wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I ran an OpenJDK Hack Day session on Saturday, at which some people got
>>> stuck on lost a fair bit of time
Thanks, looks good now.
/Erik
On 2017-01-25 13:51, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 24 Jan 2017, at 16:44, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Build changes look good except for one thing. In Javadoc.gmk, the dependency on
$(BUILD_TOOLS_JDK) needs to be set for $$($1_INDEX_FILE) (on line 317), where
the a
> On 24 Jan 2017, at 16:44, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Build changes look good except for one thing. In Javadoc.gmk, the dependency
> on $(BUILD_TOOLS_JDK) needs to be set for $$($1_INDEX_FILE) (on line 317),
> where the actual recipes are created. Setting it on the phony docs-javado
>> On 24 Jan 2017, at 21:25, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Mike Burton wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I ran an OpenJDK Hack Day session on Saturday, at which some people got
>> stuck on lost a fair bit of time, failing to build JDK9. Then we found that
>> updating gcc fro
