Hello,
I just tried this myself and configure is automatically picking up my
freetype from brew in /usr/local/opt/freetype/. Looking at my log, this
is done using pkg-config from brew. So you could try installing
pkg-config (brew install pkg-config). You can also try adding
OS: macOS High Sierra, version 10.13.2
Repo : https://github.com/dmlloyd/openjdk.git
Branch : jdk/jdk
mbldeMacBook-Pro:openjdk mbl$ bash ./configure
--with-boot-jdk=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk9.0.4.jdk/Home
configure: Configuration created at Mon Feb 12 14:43:36 CST 2018.
configure:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 2018-02-12 15:32, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> may I have a sponsor please? I am not sure whether I am allowed to push
>> myself, and if yes, to which repository.
>>
>
> Since the removal of
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 2018-02-12 14:57, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie <
> magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-02-12 14:47, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>>
>> Hi
On 2018-02-12 14:57, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
>
wrote:
On 2018-02-12 14:47, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi Magnus,
Thanks a lot for fixing this! I tried my
On 2018-02-12 15:32, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi all,
may I have a sponsor please? I am not sure whether I am allowed to push
myself, and if yes, to which repository.
Since the removal of generated-configure.sh you don't need a sponsor
just because you touch autoconf files. So for jdk/jdk, you're
Magnus:
Looks good to me as well.
/Tim
On 02/12/18 06:31, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Magnus,
thanks for doing this change. It was actually on my TODO list but I
somehow forgot about it :)
The change looks good. Thumb up from me,
Volker
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
Please disregard my last mail, the change has just been pushed.
Thanks, Thomas
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Thomas Stüfe
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> may I have a sponsor please? I am not sure whether I am allowed to push
> myself, and if yes, to which repository.
>
> I
Hi all,
may I have a sponsor please? I am not sure whether I am allowed to push
myself, and if yes, to which repository.
I have three reviewers already.
Thank you!
Thomas
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Thomas Stüfe
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> may I please have reviews for
Hi Magnus,
thanks for doing this change. It was actually on my TODO list but I
somehow forgot about it :)
The change looks good. Thumb up from me,
Volker
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
> In JDK-8195689, the generated-configure.sh was
On 2018-02-10 12:29, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Alan Bateman
wrote:
On 08/02/2018 17:49, Erik Joelsson wrote:
The check for when to generate the generated configure script is not
working quite as expected. It currently only compares
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 2018-02-12 14:47, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
> Hi Magnus,
>
> Thanks a lot for fixing this! I tried my configuration as described in
> earlier mails, and the configure scripts gets now created in the
On 2018-02-12 14:47, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi Magnus,
Thanks a lot for fixing this! I tried my configuration as described in
earlier mails, and the configure scripts gets now created in the
output directory as expected.
Some notes:
- would it be possible to write out the path name of the
Hi Magnus,
Thanks a lot for fixing this! I tried my configuration as described in
earlier mails, and the configure scripts gets now created in the output
directory as expected.
Some notes:
- would it be possible to write out the path name of the generated
configure shell script?
- No concern of
In JDK-8195689, the generated-configure.sh was no longer checked in, but
locally generated. The selected location for generation ($TOPDIR/.build)
was not unproblematic for some use cases. This patch attempts remedy this.
The new behaviour will be this:
* If run from $TOPDIR, the storage
Hi Magnus,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 2018-02-10 23:39, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>> I agree. Once you make something lazy-initted you have a concurrency
>> problem. And there's no CAS or lock on the filesystem. What
On 12/02/2018 11:42, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Why would hidden files be confusing? Or, rephrased, how is this any
more confusing than other hidden directories, such as .idea or .jib? I
modelled the behaviour on jib. In fact, I was considering using the
same directory (.jib), but since the
On 2018-02-10 23:39, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I agree. Once you make something lazy-initted you have a concurrency
problem. And there's no CAS or lock on the filesystem. What happens if
two configure processes run at exactly the same time, perhaps even with
different versions of autoconf? If
On 2018-02-10 09:12, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 08/02/2018 17:49, Erik Joelsson wrote:
The check for when to generate the generated configure script is not
working quite as expected. It currently only compares timestamps if
the local repository has any local changes in the make/autoconf
One could almost shed a tear - of joy! This is exactly the use case for
the module system that the developer community at large will understand.
Thanks for this change and a leaner meaner JDK.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 8 February 2018 at 13:37, Lance Andersen
wrote:
>
> >
20 matches
Mail list logo