Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk11.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203308
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8203308/webrev.00
Description:
- Implementation of the AppletViewer was removed
- Tests in sun/applet were removed and TEST.ROOT/TEST.groups were updated
- Sm
Erik:
The jib format version is defined in jib-profiles.js. It is used by Jib
to identify correct parsing of the file and adjust behavior of Jib if
necessary. This version needs to be bumped to 1.2.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203497
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj
The jib format version is defined in jib-profiles.js. It is used by Jib
to identify correct parsing of the file and adjust behavior of Jib if
necessary. This version needs to be bumped to 1.2.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203497
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/82034
Build changes look ok.
/Erik
On 2018-05-21 11:34, Mikhailo Seledtsov wrote:
Please review this change that will open source VM default method tests.
These tests have been used internally for a while, and are now being
open sourced. Since this is not an creation of new tests, we would
like to
Please review this change that will open source VM default method tests.
These tests have been used internally for a while, and are now being
open sourced. Since this is not an creation of new tests, we would like
to keep the changes during this review to a minimum required for open
sourcing th
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2018-05-19 04:57, Erik Österlund wrote:
Hi Aleksey,
Looks good.
Thanks,
/Erik
On 2018-05-19 13:52, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Okay, this also works for Zero, Minimal and server:
diff -r 5ec7380f671d make/hotspot/lib/JvmFeatures.gmk
--- a/make/hotspot/lib/JvmFeatures.gmk
Hi,
On 05/21/2018 10:14 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:07 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
On 05/18/2018 07:09 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
The amount of work you have to put into this far outbalances the
amount of work the OpenJDK maintainers would have to spend when (if
e
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:07 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 05/18/2018 07:09 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>> The amount of work you have to put into this far outbalances the
>> amount of work the OpenJDK maintainers would have to spend when (if
>> ever) they were to merge down upstream libj
On 05/18/2018 07:09 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> The amount of work you have to put into this far outbalances the
> amount of work the OpenJDK maintainers would have to spend when (if
> ever) they were to merge down upstream libjpeg.
You might have more luck if you replaced libjpeg with libjpeg-turbo
Thanks for the compliment, but I plan to leave this open for a little
while longer.
I have already heard back from the 6x community, and they say they are no
longer associated with the IJG group (jpegclub.org) that creates 9x.
Unless we see the potential for an upstream merge from the sourcefor
10 matches
Mail list logo
