Re: Linux + Clang + execstack

Unfortunately, my gmail marked Arthur's emails to this thread as spam, with ensuing confusion. I retargeted this fix to the new bug 8209817: stack is executable when building with Clang on Linux http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/noexecstack/

Re: [12] RFR: 8209880: tzdb.dat is not reproducibly built

Hi, On 09/18/2018 07:22 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good to me. I guess it's hard to prove that the output is now stable, but time will tell. /Erik On 2018-09-18 10:41, Naoto Sato wrote: Hello, Please review the fix to the following issue:

Re: [12] RFR: 8209880: tzdb.dat is not reproducibly built

Looks good to me. I guess it's hard to prove that the output is now stable, but time will tell. /Erik On 2018-09-18 10:41, Naoto Sato wrote: Hello, Please review the fix to the following issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8209880 The proposed changeset is located at:

[12] RFR: 8209880: tzdb.dat is not reproducibly built

Hello, Please review the fix to the following issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8209880 The proposed changeset is located at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8209880/webrev.00/ The fix is to remove the use of HashSet/Map which is not guaranteed to preserve the same order on

Re: RFR: 8209093 - JEP 340: One AArch64 Port, Not Two

On 18/09/2018 14:17, Bob Vandette wrote: I only did some basic testing of the hard-float abi. Bell SW has offered to do more extensive testing as part of this JEP. I have no way of knowing if any of the other profiles are being used but I would think it’s worth keeping them in the event that

Re: RFR: 8210647: libsaproc is being compiled without optimization.

A fix is waiting for review: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210836 Best Regards, Thomas On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: > I encountered this too when I build with ‘make’; however if I build through > JIB the error didn’t occur. > > Tony > >> On Sep 18, 2018,

Re: RFR: 8210647: libsaproc is being compiled without optimization.

I encountered this too when I build with ‘make’; however if I build through JIB the error didn’t occur. Tony > On Sep 18, 2018, at 2:08 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote: > > Hi Severin, > > I get reproducable build errors with your fix on my machine (Ubuntu 16.4). > > When I build release (no special

Re: RFF (12): JDK-8207954: Data for --release 11

On 17.9.2018 20:54, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: Jan, OK for the code changes. Thanks. I still think it would be nice to see makefile support for generating these files, as compared to comments in source coe, but that can be handled separately. Ok, I'll work on that. Thanks, Jan --

Re: RFR: 8209093 - JEP 340: One AArch64 Port, Not Two

I only did some basic testing of the hard-float abi. Bell SW has offered to do more extensive testing as part of this JEP. I have no way of knowing if any of the other profiles are being used but I would think it’s worth keeping them in the event that someone wants to try to build/test these

Re: RFR: 8210647: libsaproc is being compiled without optimization.

Hi Severin, On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 11:08 +0200, Thomas Stüfe wrote: >> Hi Severin, >> >> I get reproducable build errors with your fix on my machine (Ubuntu 16.4). >> >> When I build release (no special build options), I

Re: RFR: 8210647: libsaproc is being compiled without optimization.

Hi Thomas, On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 11:08 +0200, Thomas Stüfe wrote: > Hi Severin, > > I get reproducable build errors with your fix on my machine (Ubuntu 16.4). > > When I build release (no special build options), I get: > >

Re: RFR: 8210647: libsaproc is being compiled without optimization.

Hi Severin, I get reproducable build errors with your fix on my machine (Ubuntu 16.4). When I build release (no special build options), I get: /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-jdk/source/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/linux/native/libsaproc/ps_core.c: In function ‘read_exec_segments’: