Thanks Mikael for your review.
Is it OK to be pushed?
Best regards,
Jie
On 2020/3/14, 12:45 PM, "Mikael Vidstedt" wrote:
Looks good. I also noticed this and filed JDK-8241035[1], but closed my
issue as a duplicate of yours.
Cheers,
Mikael
[1] https://bugs.openj
Looks good. I also noticed this and filed JDK-8241035[1], but closed my issue
as a duplicate of yours.
Cheers,
Mikael
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241035
> On Mar 13, 2020, at 5:13 PM, jiefu(傅杰) wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> JBS:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-824103
Hi all,
JBS:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241034
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jiefu/8241034/webrev.00/
A shell command error was observed during the jdk configuration.
```
jdk/build/.configure-support/generated-configure.sh: line 91505: -Xmx2048M:
command not found
`
On 13/03/2020 09:32, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've regenerated this webrev as well:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8232748.11u/ (with JDK-8223678
> and JDK-8232572 applied)
>
> Patch content looks identical to the one already reviewed.
>
> I'd volunteer to push this
Hi Goetz,
thanks for the review.
This is the rebased webrev on 11u-dev after JDK-8223678, JDK-8232572 and
JDK-8232748: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8235686.11u.1/. The
changes are obviously still the same but the context differs.
Will push it in order to 11u-dev (11.0.8).
Cheer
Hi,
I've regenerated this webrev as well:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8232748.11u/ (with JDK-8223678 and
JDK-8232572 applied)
Patch content looks identical to the one already reviewed.
I'd volunteer to push this in order with the other patches.
Cheers
Christoph
> -Origin
Hi,
I regenerated the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8232572.11u.1/
Still looks pretty much the same as before. Will push to jdk11u-dev after
JDK-8223678.
Cheers
Christoph
From: Langer, Christoph
Sent: Montag, 9. März 2020 14:57
To: [email protected]
Cc: bu
