On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:07:56 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote:
>> Just in time for the holidays I have completed an implementation of the JFR
>> functionality for AIX. As a side note, this is my first submission to
>> OpenJDK 👋
>>
>> ### Implementation notes and alternatives considered
>>
>> After mod
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:07:56 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote:
>> Just in time for the holidays I have completed an implementation of the JFR
>> functionality for AIX. As a side note, this is my first submission to
>> OpenJDK 👋
>>
>> ### Implementation notes and alternatives considered
>>
>> After mod
> Just in time for the holidays I have completed an implementation of the JFR
> functionality for AIX. As a side note, this is my first submission to OpenJDK
> 👋
>
> ### Implementation notes and alternatives considered
>
> After modifying the build system to allow the --enable-jvm-feature-jfr t
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:40:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Tyler Steele has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8203290
>> - Implements JFR on AIX
>>
>>- Im
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:38:14 GMT, Christian Hagedorn
wrote:
> > > That's interesting. Is this implementation still around somewhere? I'm
> > > glad that some of the mentioned things are not a problem anymore.
> >
> >
> > Not I know. IIRC, it was based on DWARF 2.
>
> Okay, thanks.
>
> > > >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:49:08 GMT, TheShermanTanker
wrote:
> Ever since [JDK-8257679](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257679)
> was merged in 16, MSYS2 became capable of building a functional JDK on
> Windows. This PR updates some outdated documentation in building.html and
> buildin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:12:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> TheShermanTanker has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional
>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:58:26 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> > > Two general remarks. One concern I have is that the new functionality
> > > should be super stable, since nothing is more annoying than to crash
> > > during stack dumping in hs-err file; I much rather have a call stack
> > > without
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 22:23:33 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote:
>> Just in time for the holidays I have completed an implementation of the JFR
>> functionality for AIX. As a side note, this is my first submission to
>> OpenJDK 👋
>>
>> ### Implementation notes and alternatives considered
>>
>> After mod
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:19:04 GMT, Christian Hagedorn
wrote:
> > Two general remarks. One concern I have is that the new functionality
> > should be super stable, since nothing is more annoying than to crash during
> > stack dumping in hs-err file; I much rather have a call stack without bells
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 02:26:21 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> I think this feature is very useful, thanks Christian!
Thanks Yasumasa!
> SA already has similar feature to gather call stacks with DWARF, so it would
> be nice to share DWARF parser between SA and HotSpot.
I agree, that would be a g
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:28:44 GMT, TheShermanTanker
wrote:
>> Ever since [JDK-8257679](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257679)
>> was merged in 16, MSYS2 became capable of building a functional JDK on
>> Windows. This PR updates some outdated documentation in building.html and
>> bui
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:43:00 GMT, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> > That's interesting. Is this implementation still around somewhere? I'm glad
> > that some of the mentioned things are not a problem anymore.
>
> Not I know. IIRC, it was based on DWARF 2.
Okay, thanks.
>
> > > * Different compiler (and
> Ever since [JDK-8257679](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257679)
> was merged in 16, MSYS2 became capable of building a functional JDK on
> Windows. This PR updates some outdated documentation in building.html and
> building.md to reflect that change.
>
> I appreciate any reviews, a
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:26:50 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> Hi Christian, this is very nice and useful!
Thanks Thomas!
> Two general remarks. One concern I have is that the new functionality should
> be super stable, since nothing is more annoying than to crash during stack
> dumping in hs-err f
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:49:56 GMT, TheShermanTanker
wrote:
>> Ever since [JDK-8257679](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257679)
>> was merged in 16, MSYS2 became capable of building a functional JDK on
>> Windows. This PR updates some outdated documentation in building.html and
>> bui
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:49:56 GMT, TheShermanTanker
wrote:
>> Ever since [JDK-8257679](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257679)
>> was merged in 16, MSys 2 became capable of building a functional JDK on
>> Windows. This PR updates some outdated documentation in building.html and
>> bu
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:49:08 GMT, TheShermanTanker
wrote:
> Ever since [JDK-8257679](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257679)
> was merged in 16, MSys 2 became capable of building a functional JDK on
> Windows. This PR updates some outdated documentation in building.html and
> buildi
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:49:08 GMT, TheShermanTanker
wrote:
> Ever since [JDK-8257679](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257679)
> was merged in 16, MSys 2 became capable of building a functional JDK on
> Windows. This PR updates some outdated documentation in building.html and
> buildi
> Ever since [JDK-8257679](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257679)
> was merged in 16, MSys 2 became capable of building a functional JDK on
> Windows. This PR updates some outdated documentation in building.html and
> building.md to reflect that change.
>
> I appreciate any reviews,
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:21:13 GMT, TheShermanTanker
wrote:
>> The updated wording seems fine to me.
>>
>> The html file should not be edited by hand, but generated (by pandoc) using
>> the make target `update-build-docs`. If you don't have access to pandoc, I
>> can help you regenerate the fil
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:37:51 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> The updated wording seems fine to me.
>
> The html file should not be edited by hand, but generated (by pandoc) using
> the make target `update-build-docs`. If you don't have access to pandoc, I
> can help you regenerate the file.
>
> I
22 matches
Mail list logo
