Re: JDK-8028446 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper, was JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

2013-11-18 Thread Dave Pointon
Re-titled to provide link between JI & OJDK bug ids. On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 15:32 +, Dave Pointon wrote: > Hi all , > > Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I > would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps. > > I believe, as I said in the bug, that this

Re: JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

2013-11-18 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-11-15 16:32, Dave Pointon wrote: Hi all , Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps. I believe, as I said in the bug, that this would lead to an overall improvement in the usability - especially for the new

Re: JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

2013-11-17 Thread Mike Duigou
On Nov 15 2013, at 08:37 , Dave Pointon wrote: > On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 16:15 +, Alan Bateman wrote: >> On 15/11/2013 16:03, Dave Pointon wrote: >>> : >>> TFT Alan , >>> >>> I have to admit that I thought that I'd created therein - the >>> description for the Product/Category was 'Java Plat

Re: JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

2013-11-15 Thread Dave Pointon
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 16:15 +, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 15/11/2013 16:03, Dave Pointon wrote: > > : > > TFT Alan , > > > > I have to admit that I thought that I'd created therein - the > > description for the Product/Category was 'Java Platform Standard Edition > > (JDK/JRE)', so I thought tha

Re: JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

2013-11-15 Thread Alan Bateman
On 15/11/2013 16:03, Dave Pointon wrote: : TFT Alan , I have to admit that I thought that I'd created therein - the description for the Product/Category was 'Java Platform Standard Edition (JDK/JRE)', so I thought that would do it. When you submit an incident to bugs.sun.com then it gets route

Re: JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

2013-11-15 Thread Dave Pointon
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 15:47 +, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 15/11/2013 15:32, Dave Pointon wrote: > > Hi all , > > > > Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I > > would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps. > > > > I believe, as I said in the bug, that this w

Re: JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

2013-11-15 Thread Alan Bateman
On 15/11/2013 15:32, Dave Pointon wrote: Hi all , Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps. I believe, as I said in the bug, that this would lead to an overall improvement in the usability - especially for the new

JDK-9008238 Non-orthogonal usage of the configure script and its wrapper

2013-11-15 Thread Dave Pointon
Hi all , Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps. I believe, as I said in the bug, that this would lead to an overall improvement in the usability - especially for the newbie user/builder such as myself. PFA a web