Re: RFR: 8205091: AIX: build errors in hotspot after 8203641: Refactor String Deduplication into shared

2018-06-15 Thread Zhengyu Gu
Hi, Whatever the name you come up, could you please also update stringDedup.inline.hpp to use the same names? Thomas Schatzl pointed out the inconsistent, I made change to use S and Q, but apparently, I messed up in final patch. Otherwise, looks good to me too. -Zhengyu On 06/15/2018

Re: RFR: 8205091: AIX: build errors in hotspot after 8203641: Refactor String Deduplication into shared

2018-06-15 Thread René Schünemann
Hi Matthias, the name SI seems also quite "common" and may result in other naming clashes in the future. Maybe something more readable like STAT_IMPL? Please also change the name in the comment: // STAT: String Dedup Stat implementation Regards, Rene On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Baesken,

Re: RFR: 8205091: AIX: build errors in hotspot after 8203641: Refactor String Deduplication into shared

2018-06-15 Thread Thomas Stüfe
Hi Matthias, Good catch. Patch for me is good if you guys agree on a good uncommon name. Gruß Thomas On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 09:48 Baesken, Matthias wrote: > Please review this small change that fixes the AIX build after > "8203641: Refactor String Deduplication into shared". > > We are

RE: RFR: 8205091: AIX: build errors in hotspot after 8203641: Refactor String Deduplication into shared

2018-06-15 Thread Baesken, Matthias
va.net; hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: RFR: 8205091: AIX: build errors in hotspot after 8203641: > Refactor > String Deduplication into shared > > Hi Matthias, > > the name SI seems also quite "common" and may result in other naming > clashes in the futur

Re: RFR: 8205091: AIX: build errors in hotspot after 8203641: Refactor String Deduplication into shared

2018-06-15 Thread Volker Simonis
Hi Mattias, the change looks good. Could you please also update the comment in the line above which still reads "STAT". Also, maybe "STATI" would be a better name choice (longer is better :) because the probability of a clash is lower (and it would nicely align with QUEUE in the comments :) But