-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: pre-submit tests for github PRs
BTW I am wondering whether I should believe this explanation since it does
pass sometimes,
eg :
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8820
How is that possible ?
-phil
On 5/23/22 8:05 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 5/23/22 16:53
Hi,
that's because the PR is a based on a pre-loom version of master.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: build-dev On Behalf Of Philip Race
> Sent: Montag, 23. Mai 2022 17:14
> To: Aleksey Shipilev ; Ioi Lam ;
> build-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subje
BTW I am wondering whether I should believe this explanation since it
does pass sometimes,
eg :
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8820
How is that possible ?
-phil
On 5/23/22 8:05 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 5/23/22 16:53, Ioi Lam wrote:
On 5/23/2022 4:41 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On
On 5/23/22 16:53, Ioi Lam wrote:
On 5/23/2022 4:41 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/05/2022 23:58, David Holmes wrote:
GHA tests a range of OpenJDK ports, not just the "mainstream platforms".
The existing linux-86 failures (and others) are due to the Loom
integration which only fully supports a
On 5/23/2022 4:41 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/05/2022 23:58, David Holmes wrote:
GHA tests a range of OpenJDK ports, not just the "mainstream platforms".
The existing linux-86 failures (and others) are due to the Loom
integration which only fully supports a couple of platforms and which
On 22/05/2022 23:58, David Holmes wrote:
GHA tests a range of OpenJDK ports, not just the "mainstream platforms".
The existing linux-86 failures (and others) are due to the Loom
integration which only fully supports a couple of platforms and which
broke all the other ports upon initial
Yet right "at the top" of the list is Linux 86 ... do we have no way to
put it on some 2ndary list ?
-phil.
On 5/22/22 3:58 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 23/05/2022 8:22 am, Philip Race wrote:
Why is it that the vast majority of PRs are recording spurious
looking failures of github pre-submit
On 23/05/2022 8:22 am, Philip Race wrote:
Why is it that the vast majority of PRs are recording spurious looking
failures of github pre-submit tests ?
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pulls?q=type%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Arfr
There seems to be so much noise in these that I pay no attention to
