Hello,
I try to port OpenJDK to the OS VxWorks. The Problem is, that i cant
compile it on a VxWorks-Machine, so i have to cross-compile it from a Linux
machine. What I've read so far is, that i have to use openembedded to
successfully cross compile OpenJDK.
All sources I've found, were dated 2008
Thanks for explaining, John. This should work fine regardless of indentation
size as long as the tab stops in your editor are 8 wide (which may or may not
be global truth).
Kelly: Looks good!
/Staffan
On 3 mar 2012, at 14:55, John Rose wrote:
> Lest Kelly have all the fun, I'll jump in.
>
>
On 3/5/12 3:08 PM, martin burtscher wrote:
>
> Do I still need openembedded, or is this issue fixed now, and can i
> cross-compile the OpenJDK (6 or 7) project out of the box (out of the box =
> mainly just replace the compiler)?
>
To quote from the README-builds.html file in the top-level sou
jdk/make/javax/others lists the following:
#
# Files to compile
#
AUTO_FILES_JAVA_DIRS = \
javax/naming \
com/sun/naming/internal \
javax/net\
javax/script \
javax/tools \
javax/xml
... but javax.tools comes from
Hi Marty,
I've no idea what openembedded is. There are two cross-compilation
stories with OpenJDK. One is what is done externally as part of IcedTea
etc and I have no knowledge of that.
The other is the cross-compilation support that we use for our embedded
SE product. To utilise that you ne
I need a reviewer for a new attached script for JDK8 infrastructure.
SUMMARY
Most of JDK source files are required to contain a legal approved
license header. The content and the format of the header is pre-defined
by legal and any alteration is not permitted.
At the moment JDK8 contains t
If NO_DEMOS are specified, there is no demo dir and "make images" fails.
Yes, maybe it should fail, but I must work with images build now (on
deploy workspace) and I really like the NO_DEMOS option...
How about this?
diff --git a/make/common/Release.gmk b/make/common/Release.gmk
--- a/make/com
Shouldn't we skip this section if NO_DEMOS is specified?
David
On 6/03/2012 1:34 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
If NO_DEMOS are specified, there is no demo dir and "make images" fails.
Yes, maybe it should fail, but I must work with images build now (on
deploy workspace) and I really like the NO_DEMOS
Yes, it looks like part of it should be skipped. I did not try the NO_DEMOS
patch with closed source in the path.
If I were writing Release.gmk today I would make the DB rule run after the
initial-image-jre step so that it could install things directly to their final
destination.
Here's a patc
On 03/06/2012 12:33 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
Yes, it looks like part of it should be skipped. I did not try the NO_DEMOS
patch with closed source in the path.
If I were writing Release.gmk today I would make the DB rule run after the
initial-image-jre step so that it could install things direc
Can't this:
928 # DB files to add
929 ifdef OPENJDK
930
931 initial-image-jdk-db:
932
933 else
934
935 # Create the list of db *.zip files to bundle with jdk
936 ABS_DB_PATH :=$(call FullPath,$(CLOSED_SHARE_SRC)/db)
937 DB_ZIP_LIST = $(shell $(LS) $(ABS_DB_PATH)/*.zip 2>/dev/null)
938
11 matches
Mail list logo
