Hello,
The backout looks clean, ok from me.
/Erik
On 2014-09-26 22:48, Daniil Titov wrote:
Hi,
Please review webrev that reverses changes done in the team forest
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015376 removal of applet
demos).
JDK-8015376 changes were integrated in 8u-dev team
Hi all ,
I'm hoping that someone on here might have previously encountered the
problem I'm now trying to solve, ergo trying to modify the autoconf
scripts to support the building of a 31 bit target on a 64 bit machine -
the compiler on the host does take the -m31 option, but autoconf seems
to
Hi Dave,
On 1/10/2014 2:05 AM, pointo1d wrote:
Hi all ,
I'm hoping that someone on here might have previously encountered the
problem I'm now trying to solve, ergo trying to modify the autoconf
scripts to support the building of a 31 bit target on a 64 bit machine -
the compiler on the host doe
Hiya Dave ,
On 30/09/14 18:57, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 1/10/2014 2:05 AM, pointo1d wrote:
For general cross-compilation we just set extra-cflags to pass things
like this through; and don't set the --with-target-bits option.
Aside: I would think that supporting 31-bit would require a
On 1/10/2014 4:03 AM, pointo1d wrote:
Hiya Dave ,
On 30/09/14 18:57, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 1/10/2014 2:05 AM, pointo1d wrote:
For general cross-compilation we just set extra-cflags to pass things
like this through; and don't set the --with-target-bits option.
Aside: I would think th
Hiya Dave ,
On 30/09/14 19:06, David Holmes wrote:
On 1/10/2014 4:03 AM, pointo1d wrote:
Hiya Dave ,
On 30/09/14 18:57, David Holmes wrote:
Okay that sounds like we need a major change in the configure logic.
Can you tell if this comes from our specific .m4 processing or is this
part of co
