Re: RFR: JDK-8166648,,jib make run-test for langtools results in intermittent failures on windows-x86

2016-10-10 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello, The variable ARCH_DATA_MODEL is not initialized anywhere. I know JPRT sets it, but I don't think we should rely on that. /Erik On 2016-10-08 03:34, Tim Bell wrote: Hi Jon On 10/07/16 15:48, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: Tim, The problem only appears on 32-bit Windows, but the fix appear

RFR: JDK-8167424 Various trivial fixes in build system

2016-10-10 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
This is a collection of various trivial fixes on stuff I noticed when reviewing the accumulated changes in the build system the last months. The majority of the fixes is updating the copyright year for modified files. On top of this, there's also a few other fixes: * Fix spaces and indentatio

Re: RFR: JDK-8167424 Various trivial fixes in build system

2016-10-10 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good. /Erik On 2016-10-10 11:22, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: This is a collection of various trivial fixes on stuff I noticed when reviewing the accumulated changes in the build system the last months. The majority of the fixes is updating the copyright year for modified files. On top o

RFR (XS): 8167354: Missing jtreg output when run using langtools makefiles

2016-10-10 Thread Marcus Larsson
Hi, Please review the following small patch to make the output from jtreg for langtools testing through make to be saved in output.txt, just like in other repos. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mlarsson/8167354/webrev.00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167354 Thanks, Ma

Re: RFR (XS): 8167354: Missing jtreg output when run using langtools makefiles

2016-10-10 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks ok to me. /Erik On 2016-10-10 12:46, Marcus Larsson wrote: Hi, Please review the following small patch to make the output from jtreg for langtools testing through make to be saved in output.txt, just like in other repos. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mlarsson/8167354/webrev.00

Re: RFR (XS): 8167354: Missing jtreg output when run using langtools makefiles

2016-10-10 Thread Marcus Larsson
Thanks Erik! On 10/10/2016 01:00 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks ok to me. /Erik On 2016-10-10 12:46, Marcus Larsson wrote: Hi, Please review the following small patch to make the output from jtreg for langtools testing through make to be saved in output.txt, just like in other repos. W

Re: RFR (XS): 8167354: Missing jtreg output when run using langtools makefiles

2016-10-10 Thread Staffan Larsen
Looks good! Thanks, /Staffan > On 10 Oct 2016, at 12:46, Marcus Larsson wrote: > > Hi, > > Please review the following small patch to make the output from jtreg for > langtools testing through make to be saved in output.txt, just like in other > repos. > > Webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.n

Re: RFR (XS): 8167354: Missing jtreg output when run using langtools makefiles

2016-10-10 Thread Marcus Larsson
Thanks Staffan! On 10/10/2016 01:30 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote: Looks good! Thanks, /Staffan On 10 Oct 2016, at 12:46, Marcus Larsson wrote: Hi, Please review the following small patch to make the output from jtreg for langtools testing through make to be saved in output.txt, just like in

Re: RFR: JDK-8166648,,jib make run-test for langtools results in intermittent failures on windows-x86

2016-10-10 Thread David Holmes
On 10/10/2016 6:53 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, The variable ARCH_DATA_MODEL is not initialized anywhere. I know JPRT sets it, but I don't think we should rely on that. ./autoconf/buildjdk-spec.gmk.in:ARCH_DATA_MODEL := $(OPENJDK_BUILD_CPU_BITS) David /Erik On 2016-10-08 03:34, Tim Bel

Re: RFR: JDK-8166648,,jib make run-test for langtools results in intermittent failures on windows-x86

2016-10-10 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2016-10-10 14:56, David Holmes wrote: On 10/10/2016 6:53 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, The variable ARCH_DATA_MODEL is not initialized anywhere. I know JPRT sets it, but I don't think we should rely on that. ./autoconf/buildjdk-spec.gmk.in:ARCH_DATA_MODEL := $(OPENJDK_BUILD_CPU_BITS)

RFR: JDK-8062810: Examine src.zip in JDK image and decide if source classes should be organized by module

2016-10-10 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello, Please review this change, which reorganizes src.zip into modules directories. It also includes the source of any imported modules into src.zip. If an imported modules contains both sources and classes, the java sources are not recompiled, except for module-info.java. This mimics the

Re: RFR: JDK-8167424 Various trivial fixes in build system

2016-10-10 Thread Tim Bell
Magnus Looks good to me as well. /Tim On 10/10/16 02:31, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good. /Erik On 2016-10-10 11:22, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: This is a collection of various trivial fixes on stuff I noticed when reviewing the accumulated changes in the build system the last months. The m

Re: RFR: JDK-8166648,,jib make run-test for langtools results in intermittent failures on windows-x86

2016-10-10 Thread Tim Bell
Erik: On 2016-10-10 14:56, David Holmes wrote: On 10/10/2016 6:53 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, The variable ARCH_DATA_MODEL is not initialized anywhere. I know JPRT sets it, but I don't think we should rely on that. ./autoconf/buildjdk-spec.gmk.in:ARCH_DATA_MODEL := $(OPENJDK_BUILD_CPU_B

RFR: JDK-8167387: libjimage.so has a bad runpath

2016-10-10 Thread Erik Joelsson
On Solaris libjimage.so has a weird extra runpath set, pointing into the install directory of Solaris Studio. JDK-8160630 changed libjimage to be compiled as C++ library as it should be. I forgot to add the linker flags LDFLAGS_CXX_JDK to the LDFLAGS of that library. All other C++ libraries in

Re: RFR: JDK-8167387: libjimage.so has a bad runpath

2016-10-10 Thread Tim Bell
Erik: On Solaris libjimage.so has a weird extra runpath set, pointing into the install directory of Solaris Studio. JDK-8160630 changed libjimage to be compiled as C++ library as it should be. I forgot to add the linker flags LDFLAGS_CXX_JDK to the LDFLAGS of that library. All other C++ librari

Re: RFR (XS): 8167354: Missing jtreg output when run using langtools makefiles

2016-10-10 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Is there a compelling reason to use .txt as the extension, instead of something more conventional, like .log? -- Jon On 10/10/2016 04:35 AM, Marcus Larsson wrote: Thanks Staffan! On 10/10/2016 01:30 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote: Looks good! Thanks, /Staffan On 10 Oct 2016, at 12:46, Marcus La

Re: RFR: JDK-8166648,,jib make run-test for langtools results in intermittent failures on windows-x86

2016-10-10 Thread David Holmes
On 10/10/2016 11:12 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: On 2016-10-10 14:56, David Holmes wrote: On 10/10/2016 6:53 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, The variable ARCH_DATA_MODEL is not initialized anywhere. I know JPRT sets it, but I don't think we should rely on that. ./autoconf/buildjdk-spec.gmk.in:A

Re: RFR (XS): 8167354: Missing jtreg output when run using langtools makefiles

2016-10-10 Thread Staffan Larsen
The reason is to use the same name as is currently used in the jdk, hotspot, nashorn and jaxp makefiles. Having a common name makes it much easier for outside tools to find the file. > On 10 Oct 2016, at 19:31, Jonathan Gibbons > wrote: > > Is there a compelling reason to use .txt as the exte