Hi Christoph,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:01 AM Christoph Grüninger
wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> for sure, I am going to do CMake cheerleading.
>
> I think OpenJDK would profit from a change to CMake:
>
> 1. Less tools required for building: CMake + gmake/Ninja/msbuild/Xcode
> instead of Autotools and
On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>> 2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
>> tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
>> gmake
>>
> Is gmake really where we lose time? Did you analyze this or is this just an
> assumption? I would h
Hello
On macmini m1 jdk in default config can be built in about 4 minutes. (make
images)
I might guess autotools aren't the slowest thing.
Regards, Vladimir
Andrew Haley 19 марта 2021 г. 13:04:38 написал:
On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
2. More choices to actually build the project: Use
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> >> 2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
> >> tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
> >> gmake
> >>
> > Is gmake really where we lose ti
On 3/19/21 10:14 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
g
On 2021-03-19 03:14, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
gmake
Is gmake re
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM wrote:
> On 2021-03-19 03:14, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> 2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
> tools of IDEs (Visual Stud
Dear Java developers,
thank you for the great discussion!
> Thanks for that extensive explanation! I have nothing to contribute here.
> But would like to thank you guys for the work on the build system. It's
> exceptionally stable and works very well.
You seem to be fine with the build system Jav
