On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:43:38 GMT, Sergei Ustimenko
wrote:
> After generating an Intellij project with the `idea.sh` script, IDEA might
> get confused
> with the language level settings in generated .idea/misc.xml. This results in
> a problem
> with modules discussed in
> https://mail.openjd
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:43:38 GMT, Sergei Ustimenko
wrote:
> After generating an Intellij project with the `idea.sh` script, IDEA might
> get confused
> with the language level settings in generated .idea/misc.xml. This results in
> a problem
> with modules discussed in
> https://mail.openjd
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 20:00:07 GMT, jtfuller111
wrote:
> Fixing the zoom issue on IGV. I tested this on Windows and Linux and zooming
> now works as expected.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 164eff8c
Author:James Fuller
Committer: Tobias Hartmann
URL:
https://g
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:41:53 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> From the JBS issue:
>
> The idea.sh script invokes `make`, but doesn't specify a configuration. So,
> when multiple configurations are present, this results in an error like this:
>
>
> $ bash bin/idea.sh java.base
> Error: No CONF given,
> From the JBS issue:
>
> Currently idea.sh checks if `CYGPATH` is set, and then continues by invoking
> `cygpath` directly.
>
> This doesn't work if `CYGPATH` is not actually set to `cygpath`, but to
> something else, such as `wslpath`.
>
> Instead of invoking `cygpath` directly, the value of
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:54:04 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> From the JBS issue:
>
> Currently idea.sh checks if `CYGPATH` is set, and then continues by invoking
> `cygpath` directly.
>
> This doesn't work if `CYGPATH` is not actually set to `cygpath`, but to
> something else, such as `wslpath`.
>
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:02:03 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> From the JBS issue:
>
> At the end, idea.sh tries to invoke javac, but when running on WSL this
> results in the following error:
>
> bin/idea.sh: line 249: /mnt/c/progra~1/java/jdk-16/bin/javac: No such
> file or directory
>
> Adding
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:31:13 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> From the JBS issue:
>>
>> At the end, idea.sh tries to invoke javac, but when running on WSL this
>> results in the following error:
>>
>> bin/idea.sh: line 249: /mnt/c/progra~1/java/jdk-16/bin/javac: No such
>> file or directory
>>
> From the JBS issue:
>
> At the end, idea.sh tries to invoke javac, but when running on WSL this
> results in the following error:
>
> bin/idea.sh: line 249: /mnt/c/progra~1/java/jdk-16/bin/javac: No such
> file or directory
>
> Adding a .exe suffix to the javac path fixes this issue, whi
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:54:04 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> From the JBS issue:
>
> Currently idea.sh checks if `CYGPATH` is set, and then continues by invoking
> `cygpath` directly.
>
> This doesn't work if `CYGPATH` is not actually set to `cygpath`, but to
> something else, such as `wslpath`.
>
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:40:15 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> From the JBS issue:
>>
>> At the end, idea.sh tries to invoke javac, but when running on WSL this
>> results in the following error:
>>
>> bin/idea.sh: line 249: /mnt/c/progra~1/java/jdk-16/bin/javac: No such
>> file or directory
>>
> From the JBS issue:
>
> At the end, idea.sh tries to invoke javac, but when running on WSL this
> results in the following error:
>
> bin/idea.sh: line 249: /mnt/c/progra~1/java/jdk-16/bin/javac: No such
> file or directory
>
> Adding a .exe suffix to the javac path fixes this issue, whi
GHA for Windows/aarch64 was disabled in
[JDK-8268861](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268861). The problem
with GHA for windows/aarch64 was due to using Visual Studio 14.28. (Why this
suddenly *started* failing is a mystery for another time. Perhaps GitHub, or
Microsoft, changed somet
> From the JBS issue:
>
> At the end, idea.sh tries to invoke javac, but when running on WSL this
> results in the following error:
>
> bin/idea.sh: line 249: /mnt/c/progra~1/java/jdk-16/bin/javac: No such
> file or directory
>
> Adding a .exe suffix to the javac path fixes this issue, whi
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 18:05:19 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> From the JBS issue:
>>
>> At the end, idea.sh tries to invoke javac, but when running on WSL this
>> results in the following error:
>>
>> bin/idea.sh: line 249: /mnt/c/progra~1/java/jdk-16/bin/javac: No such
>> file or directory
>>
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 13:10:36 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> GHA for Windows/aarch64 was disabled in
> [JDK-8268861](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268861). The problem
> with GHA for windows/aarch64 was due to using Visual Studio 14.28. (Why this
> suddenly *started* failing is a m
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 13:10:36 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> GHA for Windows/aarch64 was disabled in
> [JDK-8268861](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268861). The problem
> with GHA for windows/aarch64 was due to using Visual Studio 14.28. (Why this
> suddenly *started* failing is a m
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 13:10:36 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> GHA for Windows/aarch64 was disabled in
> [JDK-8268861](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268861). The problem
> with GHA for windows/aarch64 was due to using Visual Studio 14.28. (Why this
> suddenly *started* failing is a m
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 13:10:36 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> GHA for Windows/aarch64 was disabled in
> [JDK-8268861](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268861). The problem
> with GHA for windows/aarch64 was due to using Visual Studio 14.28. (Why this
> suddenly *started* failing is a m
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 13:10:36 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> GHA for Windows/aarch64 was disabled in
> [JDK-8268861](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268861). The problem
> with GHA for windows/aarch64 was due to using Visual Studio 14.28. (Why this
> suddenly *started* failing is a m
> Hi,
>
> Could I have a review of this improvement that eliminates 'is_large' check if
> the event size range is certain?
>
> JDK-8246260 introduced event large checks to reduce the recording size.
> This check could be eliminated at compile/build time when one of the
> following conditions is
> Hi,
>
> Could I have a review of this improvement that eliminates 'is_large' check if
> the event size range is certain?
>
> JDK-8246260 introduced event large checks to reduce the recording size.
> This check could be eliminated at compile/build time when one of the
> following conditions is
22 matches
Mail list logo
