We recently stopped building the JDK demos, or at least most of them.
For client testing purposes we are still building some of them, and
those are now ending up in the JDK bundle. Since we are very late in JDK
9, we do not want to interrupt the testing procedures by moving these
demos out of
Can you add similar wording to that effect in DrbgParameters.java?
I'm sorry, that instruction is too unclear for me. :-( The main purpose
of this patch is to prepare for the markdown based specification, not
fixing the entire content. I'll leave modification of the actual
documentation to
Nah, it's fine.
/Erik
On 2017-05-09 04:37, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-05-05 17:52, Erik Joelsson wrote:
What's the reason for adding the conditional around SetupCopyFiles in
Javadoc.gmk? The SetupCopyFiles macro should be safe to call with an
empty FILES list. It should evaluate to
On 2017-05-06 02:22, Brad R. Wetmore wrote:
I applied the patch to the jdk workspace and verified that all of the
instances were updated to
{@docRoot}/../specs/security/standard-names.html, and that no links
remain to the old StandardNames.html.
Sean wrote:
> General: change the text of
On 2017-05-05 17:52, Erik Joelsson wrote:
What's the reason for adding the conditional around SetupCopyFiles in
Javadoc.gmk? The SetupCopyFiles macro should be safe to call with an
empty FILES list. It should evaluate to basically nothing in that case.
I don't think there's an explicit
