On 24.8.2015 08:52, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 21/08/2015 12:49, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Updated webrev top-level:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.03
Updated webrev jdk:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043937/webrev.03/jdk
Contains changes to the top level repo as
Please, review the following build change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140481
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8140481/webrev.00
Currently, the 'jdk.management' module is not a part of the JRE image
even though it should be. This patch adds 'jdk.management' to
On 2.11.2015 09:28, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/11/2015 08:08, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following build change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140481
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8140481/webrev.00
Currently, the 'jdk.management'
On 2.11.2015 09:28, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/11/2015 08:08, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following build change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140481
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8140481/webrev.00
Currently, the 'jdk.management'
Please, review the following change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043138
Webrevs:
* top level: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043138/webrev.00/top
* jdk: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043138/webrev.00/jdk
This patch splits up the jdk.jvmstat module to jdk.jvm
On 25.11.2015 10:02, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 24/11/2015 16:03, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043138
Webrevs:
* top level: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043138/webrev.00/top
* jdk: http
On 25.11.2015 11:36, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-11-25 10:39, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/11/2015 09:25, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
I don't think we can just repackage these interfaces - they are
remote API and we would break compatibility (eg. JDK 8 jvmstat would
not be able to quer
On 25.11.2015 09:37, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2015-11-25 09:11, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 24 nov. 2015, at 17:03, Jaroslav Bachorik
wrote:
Please, review the following change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043138
Webrevs:
* top level: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik
Mandy,
On 25.11.2015 18:22, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Nov 25, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik
wrote:
Updated webrevs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043138/webrev.01/top
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8043138/webrev.01/jdk
This looks fine to me. Is there any test
Please, review the following change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8138677
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8138677/webrev.00
The problem is that the class UsageTrackerClient is accessing
RuntimeMXBean.getInputArguments() method via reflection to avoid static
dep
On 15.12.2015 08:03, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/12/2015 16:55, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8138677
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8138677/webrev.00
The problem is that the class
Hi,
looks good, modulo the problems you are mentioning (docs will need
update to refer to correct locations; the same might be true for the
textual output from scripts). I believe the tests are still passing.
Supposing the remaining problems are covered by CR you can consider this
reviewed.
Hi,
looks good, modulo the problems you are mentioning (docs will need
update to refer to correct locations; the same might be true for the
textual output from scripts). I believe the tests are still passing.
Supposing the remaining problems are covered by CR you can consider this
reviewed.
13 matches
Mail list logo