On 13/04/2018 5:40 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-04-12 23:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 12/04/2018 11:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-04-12 14:15, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 12/04/2018 9:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
It is currently easy to add new JVM features to th
On 13/04/2018 5:25 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:30 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 12/04/2018 11:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-04-12 14:15, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 12/04/2018 9:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
It is currently easy to add new JVM
On 2018-04-12 23:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 12/04/2018 11:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-04-12 14:15, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 12/04/2018 9:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
It is currently easy to add new JVM features to the JVM build, but
it is not possible to remove featu
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:30 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 12/04/2018 11:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-04-12 14:15, David Holmes wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Magnus,
>>>
>>> On 12/04/2018 9:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
It is currently easy to add new JVM features to the JVM bui
On 12/04/2018 11:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-04-12 14:15, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 12/04/2018 9:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
It is currently easy to add new JVM features to the JVM build, but it
is not possible to remove features.
With this change, features can be b
On 2018-04-12 09:53, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
12 apr. 2018 kl. 17:38 skrev Erik Joelsson :
Looks good. Especially adding those # header lines in basics.m4!
Thanks!
I'm actually thinking about splitting out a utils.m4 from basics.m4, for these
kinds of helper functions. Sounds ok?
Yes, mak
> 12 apr. 2018 kl. 17:38 skrev Erik Joelsson :
>
> Looks good. Especially adding those # header lines in basics.m4!
Thanks!
I'm actually thinking about splitting out a utils.m4 from basics.m4, for these
kinds of helper functions. Sounds ok?
>
> I guess a future followup now is to get rid of
Looks good. Especially adding those # header lines in basics.m4!
I guess a future followup now is to get rid of the individual
enable/disable args that are now redundant.
/Erik
On 2018-04-12 04:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
It is currently easy to add new JVM features to the JVM build, but i
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
> On 2018-04-12 14:11, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>>
>> Hi Magnus,
>>
>> this is nice. I would like a clearer naming though, that single dash
>> is easily overlooked. How about --without-jvm-features instead?
>
>
> This is not possible. --without
On 2018-04-12 14:11, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi Magnus,
this is nice. I would like a clearer naming though, that single dash
is easily overlooked. How about --without-jvm-features instead?
This is not possible. --without-X is internally replaced by autoconf to
"--with-X=no". "--without-X=foo" is
On 2018-04-12 14:15, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 12/04/2018 9:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
It is currently easy to add new JVM features to the JVM build, but it
is not possible to remove features.
With this change, features can be both added or removed from the
default set. They ar
Hi Magnus,
On 12/04/2018 9:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
It is currently easy to add new JVM features to the JVM build, but it is
not possible to remove features.
With this change, features can be both added or removed from the default
set. They are added using --with-jvm-features=f1,f2 an
Hi Magnus,
this is nice. I would like a clearer naming though, that single dash
is easily overlooked. How about --without-jvm-features instead?
..Thomas
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
> It is currently easy to add new JVM features to the JVM build, but it is not
> po
13 matches
Mail list logo