If it was built with dynamically linked glibc, though, would it really
matter? busybox has no external dependencies other than, if dynlinked, a
couple of standard support libraries (libc, libm, libresolv, libcrypt),
so it should still work everywhere that has a more recent version of
glibc than
On 5/2/19 2:55 AM, Mattias Schlenker wrote:
> Did someone package a static binary (musl) of BusyBox for WSL yet?
>
> New builds of Win 10 allow for the import of a "backup" of a linux
> system atop of WSL from a tarball. This would be a great way of
> initially distributing busybox for WSL
Am 02.05.19 um 08:50 schrieb Ron Yorston:
Yoshi,
Sorry for the late response.
You wrote:
I tried to access the URL below, but I cannot access to it successfully.
https://busybox.net/downloads/binaries/latest/
Yes, that directory doesn't seem to exist. Is there a link to it on
the website?
Yoshi,
Sorry for the late response.
You wrote:
>I tried to access the URL below, but I cannot access to it successfully.
>https://busybox.net/downloads/binaries/latest/
Yes, that directory doesn't seem to exist. Is there a link to it on
the website? If so it should be fixed.
>Could you
