On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:21:12 +0100
Alex Samorukov wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:47:25 +0800
> > Kang-Che Sung wrote:
> >
> >> I don't see why the
> >> "Invalid ELF header" message would bother you so much, since you
> >> won't load kernel modules often.
> > As mentioned in my original post,
On 2021/1/5 上午10:47, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:32 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/1/4 下午6:01, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:11 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
finit_module() and init_module() system calls have clear specification
to only accept valid ELF image.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:47:25 +0800
Kang-Che Sung wrote:
> I don't see why the
> "Invalid ELF header" message would bother you so much, since you
> won't load kernel modules often.
As mentioned in my original post, it's a pr_err. It shows up on console!
So every boot there's 20 scary errors
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:32 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> On 2021/1/4 下午6:01, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:11 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >>
> >> finit_module() and init_module() system calls have clear specification
> >> to only accept valid ELF image.
> >>
> >> Although we try
On 2021/1/4 下午6:01, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:11 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
finit_module() and init_module() system calls have clear specification
to only accept valid ELF image.
Although we try finit_module() on compressed modules to let the kernel
determine if it's an ELF
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:11 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> finit_module() and init_module() system calls have clear specification
> to only accept valid ELF image.
>
> Although we try finit_module() on compressed modules to let the kernel
> determine if it's an ELF image, but it's not ideal, especially
finit_module() and init_module() system calls have clear specification
to only accept valid ELF image.
Although we try finit_module() on compressed modules to let the kernel
determine if it's an ELF image, but it's not ideal, especially when
newer kernel will complain when some invalid
