Hi Mike,
I met lots of mixed implicit and normal rules errors after updating
make to v3.82. These included uClinux-dist upstream and blackfin,
busybox etc.
vendors/Makefile,
all image clean romfs romfs.post vendor_%:
$(MAKE) -C $(dir_v) dir_v=$(dir_v) -f $(VEND)/vendors-common.mak
--- networking/udhcp/dhcpc.c.orig 2010-10-11 14:15:04.0 +0100
+++ networking/udhcp/dhcpc.c 2010-10-11 14:15:28.0 +0100
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@
int tryagain_timeout = 20;
int discover_timeout = 3;
int discover_retries = 3;
+ int hwtype = 1;
uint32_t server_addr = server_addr; /*
could you be abit more verbose about your patch ?
e.g what problem is fixed ?
re
wh
Sam Liddicott schrieb:
___
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
My telepathic powers say that you are trying to fix the handling
of -c CLIENTID option.
For those lucky 99,999% who never needed to know about it:
CLIENTID has the following format: 1 byte of hwtype
(1 for ethernet), followed by hw address (usually 6-byte MAC).
--rfc2132.txt--
9.14.
Hi Denys,
From TODO list:
diff
Make sure we handle empty files properly:
From the patch man page:
you can remove a file by sending out a context diff that compares
the file to be deleted with an empty file dated the Epoch. The
file will be removed unless patch is
- Original Message -
From: Lukas Huba huba.lu...@centrum.cz
To: busybox@busybox.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 6:43 PM
Subject: [PATCH] Diff: Make sure we handle empty files properly
Suggested rewording of the comment and help texts
Gilles
busybox.patch
Description: Binary data
[Sorry, the previous mail seems to have been eaten by the smarthost,
apologies if it comes twice.]
function old new delta
add_shell_main - 459+459
.rodata
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:18:43 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Tuesday 19 October 2010 22:33, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
[Sorry, the previous mail seems to have been eaten by the smarthost,
apologies if it comes twice.]
function old new
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 06:33:50 -0500, Matthew Stoltenberg wrote:
Why do you need it? (I ask because sometimes there _is_ a valid,
but unknown to me, reason to have this or that tool in bbox).
I will vouch that a lot of debian based systems seem to break if you
don't have /etc/shells
On 10/20/10 09:55, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Randonly googled up page, http://man.he.net/man8/add-shell, says:
add-shell copy /etc/shells to /etc/shells.tmp, add the given shells to
this file if they are not already present, and copy this temporary file
back to /etc/shells.
How about this? (I left locking in place but applied other changes)
function old new delta
add_shell_main - 497+497
.rodata 144696 144795 +99
11 matches
Mail list logo
