fer to their SHA instruction set, unlike the AES instruction set.
Thanks I did miss that. I can now see that this approach prevents cpuid from
being called on every invocation of the sha1 & sha256 functions -- which would
happen with my patch on systems that don't have the SHA extensions.
1, 2023 at 12:01*PM alice wrote:
>>> On Tue Feb 28, 2023 at 11:17 PM CET, wrote:
>>>> I'm having an intermittent issue with "BusyBox v1.36.0 (2023-01-03 22:49:12
>>>> UTC)" (the one from the Docker image busybox:musl) when running on amd64
>
On 1 Mar 2023, at 12:53 PM, Natanael Copa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 01 Mar 2023 11:55:16 +0100
> "alice" wrote:
>
>> On Tue Feb 28, 2023 at 11:17 PM CET, wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm having an intermittent issue with "BusyBox v1.36.
On 1 Mar 2023, at 11:55 AM, alice wrote:
>
> On Tue Feb 28, 2023 at 11:17 PM CET, wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm having an intermittent issue with "BusyBox v1.36.0 (2023-01-03 22:49:12
>> UTC)" (the one from the Docker image busybox:musl) when running on amd64
Quick update: I've tried all these docker base images:
busybox:1.3{4,5,6}-{musl,uclibc,glibc} and I can only reproduce the failure in
1.36 - but it does fail with all three stdlib variants.
These docker images contain the core dump:
ghcr.io/backplane/avxtest:1.36-glibc-1677653916
ghcr.io
Hi,
I'm having an intermittent issue with "BusyBox v1.36.0 (2023-01-03 22:49:12
UTC)" (the one from the Docker image busybox:musl) when running on amd64 GitHub
actions runner VMs (azure).
When I use sha256sum it is getting terminated with SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
The iss
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:39:53AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:16 AM, busy...@eehouse.org wrote:
I work for a company that uses busybox and am upgrading us to 1.17.3.
'seq' has been fixed since our old version so that 'seq n 0 n+1'
now returns an infinite
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 16:21 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 16:15:28 RiCH Busybox wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 09:23 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:40:05PM +0100, RiCH Busybox wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 07:49 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 09:23 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:40:05PM +0100, RiCH Busybox wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 07:49 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
Have you perhaps tried 'modprobe'? My understanding is that insmod
always did require the full path (from
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 07:49 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:03:50PM +0100, RiCH Busybox wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade Busybox from busybox-1.1.0.5VT to 1.17.2 on a
Belkin F5D8235 v1 router. (Cross compiling under ubuntu x64 with
supplied toolchain
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 07:49 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:03:50PM +0100, RiCH Busybox wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade Busybox from busybox-1.1.0.5VT to 1.17.2 on a
Belkin F5D8235 v1 router. (Cross compiling under ubuntu x64 with
supplied toolchain
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade Busybox from busybox-1.1.0.5VT to 1.17.2 on a
Belkin F5D8235 v1 router. (Cross compiling under ubuntu x64 with
supplied toolchain , which works all fine using supplied old busybox
etc.)
I am currently stuck because insmod won't load from the module name
alone
: xwords.sourceforge.net *
**
___
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
13 matches
Mail list logo
