Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-20 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
 Nevermind - I have it hooked between the radio and tuner.  At one point I had 
pulled the tuner out to just test the radio to antenna when I was seeing the 
really low power.  It was a long weekend at work and I'm still recovering.
On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:53:26 AM CDT, DAVID ELY 
 wrote:  
 
  I must admit to a bit of confusion as to why the SWR meter was placed between 
the tuner and the antenna. ???Normally, it would be between the tuner and the 
radio to show the SWR being presented to the radio. 
Dave -N5EKWOn Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:35:43 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via 
BVARC  wrote:  
 
  I don't have a dummy load, but have one on order so I can check to see if it 
is the radio or more work needs to be done.   I will say that I found quite a 
few articles on QRZ of owners with the 857d saying if your getting 40 watts ssb 
that's all it will do.  As far as the watt meter its fairly new and I have only 
used it for VHF and its been pretty accurate so far.  
https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/ft-857d-with-low-power-output-on-ssb.219185/



On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:08:55 AM CDT, Rick Hiller via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Chad,
Are you driving a 50 ohm dummy load?  It would be best to do so.
Are you confident that your watt/SWR meter is correctt at HF freqs?  
When testing like this, having known references for test gear is important. 
Rick -- W5RH
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:

 I wanted to provide a quick update on what I have found and what I have done 
thus far.  I had some time on Sunday afternoon and realized that my MFJ-849 
wattmeter had the ability to do HF, so I plugged it in between the tuner and 
the antenna and did some testing.  On key up at 100 watts ssb I was lucky if I 
could get the meter past 9 watts (just talking it was around 5 and if i 
whistled it would hit 9) with an SWR of 1.2 and very little reflected power 
showing on the meter.  I checked the SSB mic gain (I had it at 25 - factory is 
50) and I checked the Processor setting (it as at 50 - factory setting is 50).  
After some searches I ended up doing a factory reset on the 857d and was able 
to get the transmit power on SSB @100 to at least come up to about 65 watts if 
I whistle and average around 40 watts normally talking.  Doing some more 
research it seems as though the ALC on this rig is a bit wonky and seems to 
like to cut power.  I'm still playing with it but I think it may be time to 
step up to something else.  

On Saturday, October 17, 2020, 05:28:38 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Wanted to thank you all for your help so far and taking the time to reply.  
I’m working this weekend and this week looks rainy but I’ll try to move the 
tuner out there since it’s battery powered and give it a try. I like the idea 
behind this and with only 100 watts keeping losses down to minimum makes 
perfect sense.  
Rick as far as the balun goes unfortunately terms get interchanged - DX refers 
to it as a 1:1 but it’s a choke that mounts on the antenna base to keep the 
cable feeding the antenna from becoming another radial - at least that’s the 
theory behind it.   I’ve run it both ways - with and without - and it was the 
same result. If you think adding one going up the wall would be a good idea I’m 
happy to build one and do that as well.  I definitely don’t want rf coming in 
the house and so far I have not seen any issues. Also, I am running the tuner 
because 80 on both antennas is pretty narrow banded being coil loaded.
Jimmy I spent the summer laying down about 1000 feet of radials for the 
vertical in as much of a 360 degree pattern as I could.  It’s pretty narrow 
banded on 80 being coil loaded so that’s why I run the tuner, but on the rest 
of the bands I could probably get away without it based on my swr’s.   
I’ll also try and get some pictures of my setup posted on Sunday after work. 

- Chad

On Oct 16, 2020, at 11:20 PM, Rick Hiller  wrote:



Hey Chad,
I have read thru all of your notes and the responses.  Looks like you got alot 
of help, so I will limit my comments.
Not sure why you have a 1:1 Balun at the feed point of the 6BTV.   If anything 
it should be an unun, but just running coax directly to the vertical is an OK 
move.   I would however place a choke of some sort in the feedline right where 
it runs up the wall on the outside of your house.   This will eliminate any 
antenna currents flowing on the LMR that runs parallel to the radials.  This 
current could cause problems in the shack if left un-choked.   As a secondary 
precaution, placing a choke on the feedline right where it enters the shack is 
another good practise, just incase some common mode current is generated on the 
feedline as it runs thru the attic, etc. 
If you have tuned your vertical with your MFJ 269 then why do you have a tuner 
in your shack?  You should run without the tuner -- tuner in bypass mode..  
Same comment on the 80 meter Inv V.  If tuned to 

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-20 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
 I wanted to see what the SWR measurement and reflected power was showing 
between the tuner and antenna since I knew there was some mismatch there and 
validate what my antenna analyzer was showing. 


On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:53:32 AM CDT, DAVID ELY via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
  I must admit to a bit of confusion as to why the SWR meter was placed between 
the tuner and the antenna. ???Normally, it would be between the tuner and the 
radio to show the SWR being presented to the radio. 
Dave -N5EKWOn Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:35:43 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via 
BVARC  wrote:  
 
  I don't have a dummy load, but have one on order so I can check to see if it 
is the radio or more work needs to be done.   I will say that I found quite a 
few articles on QRZ of owners with the 857d saying if your getting 40 watts ssb 
that's all it will do.  As far as the watt meter its fairly new and I have only 
used it for VHF and its been pretty accurate so far.  
https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/ft-857d-with-low-power-output-on-ssb.219185/



On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:08:55 AM CDT, Rick Hiller via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Chad,
Are you driving a 50 ohm dummy load?  It would be best to do so.
Are you confident that your watt/SWR meter is correctt at HF freqs?  
When testing like this, having known references for test gear is important. 
Rick -- W5RH
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:

 I wanted to provide a quick update on what I have found and what I have done 
thus far.  I had some time on Sunday afternoon and realized that my MFJ-849 
wattmeter had the ability to do HF, so I plugged it in between the tuner and 
the antenna and did some testing.  On key up at 100 watts ssb I was lucky if I 
could get the meter past 9 watts (just talking it was around 5 and if i 
whistled it would hit 9) with an SWR of 1.2 and very little reflected power 
showing on the meter.  I checked the SSB mic gain (I had it at 25 - factory is 
50) and I checked the Processor setting (it as at 50 - factory setting is 50).  
After some searches I ended up doing a factory reset on the 857d and was able 
to get the transmit power on SSB @100 to at least come up to about 65 watts if 
I whistle and average around 40 watts normally talking.  Doing some more 
research it seems as though the ALC on this rig is a bit wonky and seems to 
like to cut power.  I'm still playing with it but I think it may be time to 
step up to something else.  

On Saturday, October 17, 2020, 05:28:38 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Wanted to thank you all for your help so far and taking the time to reply.  
I’m working this weekend and this week looks rainy but I’ll try to move the 
tuner out there since it’s battery powered and give it a try. I like the idea 
behind this and with only 100 watts keeping losses down to minimum makes 
perfect sense.  
Rick as far as the balun goes unfortunately terms get interchanged - DX refers 
to it as a 1:1 but it’s a choke that mounts on the antenna base to keep the 
cable feeding the antenna from becoming another radial - at least that’s the 
theory behind it.   I’ve run it both ways - with and without - and it was the 
same result. If you think adding one going up the wall would be a good idea I’m 
happy to build one and do that as well.  I definitely don’t want rf coming in 
the house and so far I have not seen any issues. Also, I am running the tuner 
because 80 on both antennas is pretty narrow banded being coil loaded.
Jimmy I spent the summer laying down about 1000 feet of radials for the 
vertical in as much of a 360 degree pattern as I could.  It’s pretty narrow 
banded on 80 being coil loaded so that’s why I run the tuner, but on the rest 
of the bands I could probably get away without it based on my swr’s.   
I’ll also try and get some pictures of my setup posted on Sunday after work. 

- Chad

On Oct 16, 2020, at 11:20 PM, Rick Hiller  wrote:



Hey Chad,
I have read thru all of your notes and the responses.  Looks like you got alot 
of help, so I will limit my comments.
Not sure why you have a 1:1 Balun at the feed point of the 6BTV.   If anything 
it should be an unun, but just running coax directly to the vertical is an OK 
move.   I would however place a choke of some sort in the feedline right where 
it runs up the wall on the outside of your house.   This will eliminate any 
antenna currents flowing on the LMR that runs parallel to the radials.  This 
current could cause problems in the shack if left un-choked.   As a secondary 
precaution, placing a choke on the feedline right where it enters the shack is 
another good practise, just incase some common mode current is generated on the 
feedline as it runs thru the attic, etc. 
If you have tuned your vertical with your MFJ 269 then why do you have a tuner 
in your shack?  You should run without the tuner -- tuner in bypass mode..  
Same comment on the 80 meter Inv V.  If tuned to 3910, why the 

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-20 Thread DAVID ELY via BVARC
 I must admit to a bit of confusion as to why the SWR meter was placed between 
the tuner and the antenna. ???Normally, it would be between the tuner and the 
radio to show the SWR being presented to the radio. 
Dave -N5EKWOn Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:35:43 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via 
BVARC  wrote:  
 
  I don't have a dummy load, but have one on order so I can check to see if it 
is the radio or more work needs to be done.   I will say that I found quite a 
few articles on QRZ of owners with the 857d saying if your getting 40 watts ssb 
that's all it will do.  As far as the watt meter its fairly new and I have only 
used it for VHF and its been pretty accurate so far.  
https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/ft-857d-with-low-power-output-on-ssb.219185/



On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:08:55 AM CDT, Rick Hiller via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Chad,
Are you driving a 50 ohm dummy load?  It would be best to do so.
Are you confident that your watt/SWR meter is correctt at HF freqs?  
When testing like this, having known references for test gear is important. 
Rick -- W5RH
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:

 I wanted to provide a quick update on what I have found and what I have done 
thus far.  I had some time on Sunday afternoon and realized that my MFJ-849 
wattmeter had the ability to do HF, so I plugged it in between the tuner and 
the antenna and did some testing.  On key up at 100 watts ssb I was lucky if I 
could get the meter past 9 watts (just talking it was around 5 and if i 
whistled it would hit 9) with an SWR of 1.2 and very little reflected power 
showing on the meter.  I checked the SSB mic gain (I had it at 25 - factory is 
50) and I checked the Processor setting (it as at 50 - factory setting is 50).  
After some searches I ended up doing a factory reset on the 857d and was able 
to get the transmit power on SSB @100 to at least come up to about 65 watts if 
I whistle and average around 40 watts normally talking.  Doing some more 
research it seems as though the ALC on this rig is a bit wonky and seems to 
like to cut power.  I'm still playing with it but I think it may be time to 
step up to something else.  

On Saturday, October 17, 2020, 05:28:38 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Wanted to thank you all for your help so far and taking the time to reply.  
I’m working this weekend and this week looks rainy but I’ll try to move the 
tuner out there since it’s battery powered and give it a try. I like the idea 
behind this and with only 100 watts keeping losses down to minimum makes 
perfect sense.  
Rick as far as the balun goes unfortunately terms get interchanged - DX refers 
to it as a 1:1 but it’s a choke that mounts on the antenna base to keep the 
cable feeding the antenna from becoming another radial - at least that’s the 
theory behind it.   I’ve run it both ways - with and without - and it was the 
same result. If you think adding one going up the wall would be a good idea I’m 
happy to build one and do that as well.  I definitely don’t want rf coming in 
the house and so far I have not seen any issues. Also, I am running the tuner 
because 80 on both antennas is pretty narrow banded being coil loaded.
Jimmy I spent the summer laying down about 1000 feet of radials for the 
vertical in as much of a 360 degree pattern as I could.  It’s pretty narrow 
banded on 80 being coil loaded so that’s why I run the tuner, but on the rest 
of the bands I could probably get away without it based on my swr’s.   
I’ll also try and get some pictures of my setup posted on Sunday after work. 

- Chad

On Oct 16, 2020, at 11:20 PM, Rick Hiller  wrote:



Hey Chad,
I have read thru all of your notes and the responses.  Looks like you got alot 
of help, so I will limit my comments.
Not sure why you have a 1:1 Balun at the feed point of the 6BTV.   If anything 
it should be an unun, but just running coax directly to the vertical is an OK 
move.   I would however place a choke of some sort in the feedline right where 
it runs up the wall on the outside of your house.   This will eliminate any 
antenna currents flowing on the LMR that runs parallel to the radials.  This 
current could cause problems in the shack if left un-choked.   As a secondary 
precaution, placing a choke on the feedline right where it enters the shack is 
another good practise, just incase some common mode current is generated on the 
feedline as it runs thru the attic, etc. 
If you have tuned your vertical with your MFJ 269 then why do you have a tuner 
in your shack?  You should run without the tuner -- tuner in bypass mode..  
Same comment on the 80 meter Inv V.  If tuned to 3910, why the tuner?  Unless 
you are running more than 100 KHz from the sweet spot.   You should be doing 
well into the Rag Chew net with your INV V at the height you have it..
Reconfirm that your antennas are tuned to the freqs you want.  Lowest SWR 
reading as close to the antenna feedpoint as you can. 

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-20 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
 I don't have a dummy load, but have one on order so I can check to see if it 
is the radio or more work needs to be done.   I will say that I found quite a 
few articles on QRZ of owners with the 857d saying if your getting 40 watts ssb 
that's all it will do.  As far as the watt meter its fairly new and I have only 
used it for VHF and its been pretty accurate so far.  
https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/ft-857d-with-low-power-output-on-ssb.219185/



On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:08:55 AM CDT, Rick Hiller via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Chad,
Are you driving a 50 ohm dummy load?  It would be best to do so.
Are you confident that your watt/SWR meter is correctt at HF freqs?  
When testing like this, having known references for test gear is important. 
Rick -- W5RH
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:

 I wanted to provide a quick update on what I have found and what I have done 
thus far.  I had some time on Sunday afternoon and realized that my MFJ-849 
wattmeter had the ability to do HF, so I plugged it in between the tuner and 
the antenna and did some testing.  On key up at 100 watts ssb I was lucky if I 
could get the meter past 9 watts (just talking it was around 5 and if i 
whistled it would hit 9) with an SWR of 1.2 and very little reflected power 
showing on the meter.  I checked the SSB mic gain (I had it at 25 - factory is 
50) and I checked the Processor setting (it as at 50 - factory setting is 50).  
After some searches I ended up doing a factory reset on the 857d and was able 
to get the transmit power on SSB @100 to at least come up to about 65 watts if 
I whistle and average around 40 watts normally talking.  Doing some more 
research it seems as though the ALC on this rig is a bit wonky and seems to 
like to cut power.  I'm still playing with it but I think it may be time to 
step up to something else.  

On Saturday, October 17, 2020, 05:28:38 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Wanted to thank you all for your help so far and taking the time to reply.  
I’m working this weekend and this week looks rainy but I’ll try to move the 
tuner out there since it’s battery powered and give it a try. I like the idea 
behind this and with only 100 watts keeping losses down to minimum makes 
perfect sense.  
Rick as far as the balun goes unfortunately terms get interchanged - DX refers 
to it as a 1:1 but it’s a choke that mounts on the antenna base to keep the 
cable feeding the antenna from becoming another radial - at least that’s the 
theory behind it.   I’ve run it both ways - with and without - and it was the 
same result. If you think adding one going up the wall would be a good idea I’m 
happy to build one and do that as well.  I definitely don’t want rf coming in 
the house and so far I have not seen any issues. Also, I am running the tuner 
because 80 on both antennas is pretty narrow banded being coil loaded.
Jimmy I spent the summer laying down about 1000 feet of radials for the 
vertical in as much of a 360 degree pattern as I could.  It’s pretty narrow 
banded on 80 being coil loaded so that’s why I run the tuner, but on the rest 
of the bands I could probably get away without it based on my swr’s.   
I’ll also try and get some pictures of my setup posted on Sunday after work. 

- Chad

On Oct 16, 2020, at 11:20 PM, Rick Hiller  wrote:



Hey Chad,
I have read thru all of your notes and the responses.  Looks like you got alot 
of help, so I will limit my comments.
Not sure why you have a 1:1 Balun at the feed point of the 6BTV.   If anything 
it should be an unun, but just running coax directly to the vertical is an OK 
move.   I would however place a choke of some sort in the feedline right where 
it runs up the wall on the outside of your house.   This will eliminate any 
antenna currents flowing on the LMR that runs parallel to the radials.  This 
current could cause problems in the shack if left un-choked.   As a secondary 
precaution, placing a choke on the feedline right where it enters the shack is 
another good practise, just incase some common mode current is generated on the 
feedline as it runs thru the attic, etc. 
If you have tuned your vertical with your MFJ 269 then why do you have a tuner 
in your shack?  You should run without the tuner -- tuner in bypass mode..  
Same comment on the 80 meter Inv V.  If tuned to 3910, why the tuner?  Unless 
you are running more than 100 KHz from the sweet spot.   You should be doing 
well into the Rag Chew net with your INV V at the height you have it..
Reconfirm that your antennas are tuned to the freqs you want.  Lowest SWR 
reading as close to the antenna feedpoint as you can.   Then make sure your 
transmission line is providing the maximum power out from your xcvr.
I hope you have a separate SWR power meter at your station, so you can see just 
how much power the xcvr is putting out.  This is pretty critical to be able to 
see this.  
I read that it seems that both antennas are 

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-20 Thread Rick Hiller via BVARC
Chad,

Are you driving a 50 ohm dummy load?  It would be best to do so.

Are you confident that your watt/SWR meter is correctt at HF freqs?

When testing like this, having known references for test gear is important.

Rick -- W5RH

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
wrote:

> I wanted to provide a quick update on what I have found and what I have
> done thus far.  I had some time on Sunday afternoon and realized that my
> MFJ-849 wattmeter had the ability to do HF, so I plugged it in between the
> tuner and the antenna and did some testing.  On key up at 100 watts ssb I
> was lucky if I could get the meter past 9 watts (just talking it was around
> 5 and if i whistled it would hit 9) with an SWR of 1.2 and very little
> reflected power showing on the meter.  I checked the SSB mic gain (I had it
> at 25 - factory is 50) and I checked the Processor setting (it as at 50 -
> factory setting is 50).  After some searches I ended up doing a factory
> reset on the 857d and was able to get the transmit power on SSB @100 to at
> least come up to about 65 watts if I whistle and average around 40 watts
> normally talking.  Doing some more research it seems as though the ALC on
> this rig is a bit wonky and seems to like to cut power.  I'm still playing
> with it but I think it may be time to step up to something else.
>
>
> On Saturday, October 17, 2020, 05:28:38 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC <
> bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
>
>
> Wanted to thank you all for your help so far and taking the time to reply.
>
>
> I’m working this weekend and this week looks rainy but I’ll try to move
> the tuner out there since it’s battery powered and give it a try. I like
> the idea behind this and with only 100 watts keeping losses down to minimum
> makes perfect sense.
>
> Rick as far as the balun goes unfortunately terms get interchanged - DX
> refers to it as a 1:1 but it’s a choke that mounts on the antenna base to
> keep the cable feeding the antenna from becoming another radial - at least
> that’s the theory behind it.   I’ve run it both ways - with and without -
> and it was the same result. If you think adding one going up the wall would
> be a good idea I’m happy to build one and do that as well.  I definitely
> don’t want rf coming in the house and so far I have not seen any issues.
> Also, I am running the tuner because 80 on both antennas is pretty narrow
> banded being coil loaded.
>
> Jimmy I spent the summer laying down about 1000 feet of radials for the
> vertical in as much of a 360 degree pattern as I could.  It’s pretty narrow
> banded on 80 being coil loaded so that’s why I run the tuner, but on the
> rest of the bands I could probably get away without it based on my swr’s.
>
> I’ll also try and get some pictures of my setup posted on Sunday after
> work.
>
> - Chad
>
> On Oct 16, 2020, at 11:20 PM, Rick Hiller  wrote:
>
> 
> Hey Chad,
>
> I have read thru all of your notes and the responses.  Looks like you got
> alot of help, so I will limit my comments.
>
> Not sure why you have a 1:1 Balun at the feed point of the 6BTV.   If
> anything it should be an unun, but just running coax directly to the
> vertical is an OK move.   I would however place a choke of some sort in the
> feedline right where it runs up the wall on the outside of your house.
>  This will eliminate any antenna currents flowing on the LMR that runs
> parallel to the radials.  This current could cause problems in the shack if
> left un-choked.   As a secondary precaution, placing a choke on the
> feedline right where it enters the shack is another good practise, just
> incase some common mode current is generated on the feedline as it runs
> thru the attic, etc.
>
> If you have tuned your vertical with your MFJ 269 then why do you have a
> tuner in your shack?  You should run without the tuner -- tuner in bypass
> mode..  Same comment on the 80 meter Inv V.  If tuned to 3910, why the
> tuner?  Unless you are running more than 100 KHz from the sweet spot.   You
> should be doing well into the Rag Chew net with your INV V at the height
> you have it..
>
> Reconfirm that your antennas are tuned to the freqs you want.  Lowest SWR
> reading as close to the antenna feedpoint as you can.   Then make sure your
> transmission line is providing the maximum power out from your xcvr.
>
> I hope you have a separate SWR power meter at your station, so you can see
> just how much power the xcvr is putting out.  This is pretty critical to be
> able to see this.
>
> I read that it seems that both antennas are having a problem of some
> type.   As Jeff suggests, testing your transmission lines for maximum power
> transfer to the antennas is a good step to take and provide you with a bit
> of confidence in your installation.  There are a few ways to do this with
> dummy loads and watt meters being switched around.
>
> Keep us all posted on your testing and system checkout.   You'll get there
> for sure.
>
> GL and 73Rick -- W5RH
>
>
>
>
> 

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-20 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
 I wanted to provide a quick update on what I have found and what I have done 
thus far.  I had some time on Sunday afternoon and realized that my MFJ-849 
wattmeter had the ability to do HF, so I plugged it in between the tuner and 
the antenna and did some testing.  On key up at 100 watts ssb I was lucky if I 
could get the meter past 9 watts (just talking it was around 5 and if i 
whistled it would hit 9) with an SWR of 1.2 and very little reflected power 
showing on the meter.  I checked the SSB mic gain (I had it at 25 - factory is 
50) and I checked the Processor setting (it as at 50 - factory setting is 50).  
After some searches I ended up doing a factory reset on the 857d and was able 
to get the transmit power on SSB @100 to at least come up to about 65 watts if 
I whistle and average around 40 watts normally talking.  Doing some more 
research it seems as though the ALC on this rig is a bit wonky and seems to 
like to cut power.  I'm still playing with it but I think it may be time to 
step up to something else.  

On Saturday, October 17, 2020, 05:28:38 AM CDT, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Wanted to thank you all for your help so far and taking the time to reply.  
I’m working this weekend and this week looks rainy but I’ll try to move the 
tuner out there since it’s battery powered and give it a try. I like the idea 
behind this and with only 100 watts keeping losses down to minimum makes 
perfect sense.  
Rick as far as the balun goes unfortunately terms get interchanged - DX refers 
to it as a 1:1 but it’s a choke that mounts on the antenna base to keep the 
cable feeding the antenna from becoming another radial - at least that’s the 
theory behind it.   I’ve run it both ways - with and without - and it was the 
same result. If you think adding one going up the wall would be a good idea I’m 
happy to build one and do that as well.  I definitely don’t want rf coming in 
the house and so far I have not seen any issues. Also, I am running the tuner 
because 80 on both antennas is pretty narrow banded being coil loaded.
Jimmy I spent the summer laying down about 1000 feet of radials for the 
vertical in as much of a 360 degree pattern as I could.  It’s pretty narrow 
banded on 80 being coil loaded so that’s why I run the tuner, but on the rest 
of the bands I could probably get away without it based on my swr’s.   
I’ll also try and get some pictures of my setup posted on Sunday after work. 

- Chad

On Oct 16, 2020, at 11:20 PM, Rick Hiller  wrote:



Hey Chad,
I have read thru all of your notes and the responses.  Looks like you got alot 
of help, so I will limit my comments.
Not sure why you have a 1:1 Balun at the feed point of the 6BTV.   If anything 
it should be an unun, but just running coax directly to the vertical is an OK 
move.   I would however place a choke of some sort in the feedline right where 
it runs up the wall on the outside of your house.   This will eliminate any 
antenna currents flowing on the LMR that runs parallel to the radials.  This 
current could cause problems in the shack if left un-choked.   As a secondary 
precaution, placing a choke on the feedline right where it enters the shack is 
another good practise, just incase some common mode current is generated on the 
feedline as it runs thru the attic, etc. 
If you have tuned your vertical with your MFJ 269 then why do you have a tuner 
in your shack?  You should run without the tuner -- tuner in bypass mode..  
Same comment on the 80 meter Inv V.  If tuned to 3910, why the tuner?  Unless 
you are running more than 100 KHz from the sweet spot.   You should be doing 
well into the Rag Chew net with your INV V at the height you have it..
Reconfirm that your antennas are tuned to the freqs you want.  Lowest SWR 
reading as close to the antenna feedpoint as you can.   Then make sure your 
transmission line is providing the maximum power out from your xcvr.
I hope you have a separate SWR power meter at your station, so you can see just 
how much power the xcvr is putting out.  This is pretty critical to be able to 
see this.  
I read that it seems that both antennas are having a problem of some type.   As 
Jeff suggests, testing your transmission lines for maximum power transfer to 
the antennas is a good step to take and provide you with a bit of confidence in 
your installation.  There are a few ways to do this with dummy loads and watt 
meters being switched around.
Keep us all posted on your testing and system checkout.   You'll get there for 
sure.
GL and 73Rick -- W5RH



|  | Virus-free. www.avast.com  |


On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 6:56 PM Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:

I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole from 
2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal contacts 
with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.  
Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but 

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-17 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
Wanted to thank you all for your help so far and taking the time to reply.  

I’m working this weekend and this week looks rainy but I’ll try to move the 
tuner out there since it’s battery powered and give it a try. I like the idea 
behind this and with only 100 watts keeping losses down to minimum makes 
perfect sense.  

Rick as far as the balun goes unfortunately terms get interchanged - DX refers 
to it as a 1:1 but it’s a choke that mounts on the antenna base to keep the 
cable feeding the antenna from becoming another radial - at least that’s the 
theory behind it.   I’ve run it both ways - with and without - and it was the 
same result. If you think adding one going up the wall would be a good idea I’m 
happy to build one and do that as well.  I definitely don’t want rf coming in 
the house and so far I have not seen any issues. Also, I am running the tuner 
because 80 on both antennas is pretty narrow banded being coil loaded.

Jimmy I spent the summer laying down about 1000 feet of radials for the 
vertical in as much of a 360 degree pattern as I could.  It’s pretty narrow 
banded on 80 being coil loaded so that’s why I run the tuner, but on the rest 
of the bands I could probably get away without it based on my swr’s.   

I’ll also try and get some pictures of my setup posted on Sunday after work. 

- Chad

> On Oct 16, 2020, at 11:20 PM, Rick Hiller  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hey Chad,
> 
> I have read thru all of your notes and the responses.  Looks like you got 
> alot of help, so I will limit my comments.
> 
> Not sure why you have a 1:1 Balun at the feed point of the 6BTV.   If 
> anything it should be an unun, but just running coax directly to the vertical 
> is an OK move.   I would however place a choke of some sort in the feedline 
> right where it runs up the wall on the outside of your house.   This will 
> eliminate any antenna currents flowing on the LMR that runs parallel to the 
> radials.  This current could cause problems in the shack if left un-choked.   
> As a secondary precaution, placing a choke on the feedline right where it 
> enters the shack is another good practise, just incase some common mode 
> current is generated on the feedline as it runs thru the attic, etc. 
> 
> If you have tuned your vertical with your MFJ 269 then why do you have a 
> tuner in your shack?  You should run without the tuner -- tuner in bypass 
> mode..  Same comment on the 80 meter Inv V.  If tuned to 3910, why the tuner? 
>  Unless you are running more than 100 KHz from the sweet spot.   You should 
> be doing well into the Rag Chew net with your INV V at the height you have 
> it..
> 
> Reconfirm that your antennas are tuned to the freqs you want.  Lowest SWR 
> reading as close to the antenna feedpoint as you can.   Then make sure your 
> transmission line is providing the maximum power out from your xcvr.
> 
> I hope you have a separate SWR power meter at your station, so you can see 
> just how much power the xcvr is putting out.  This is pretty critical to be 
> able to see this.  
> 
> I read that it seems that both antennas are having a problem of some type.   
> As Jeff suggests, testing your transmission lines for maximum power transfer 
> to the antennas is a good step to take and provide you with a bit of 
> confidence in your installation.  There are a few ways to do this with dummy 
> loads and watt meters being switched around.
> 
> Keep us all posted on your testing and system checkout.   You'll get there 
> for sure.
> 
> GL and 73Rick -- W5RH
> 
> 
> 
>   Virus-free. www.avast.com
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 6:56 PM Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  
>> wrote:
>> I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole 
>> from 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal 
>> contacts with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.  
>> Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
>> tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very few 
>> contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.  I 
>> might get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check into 
>> the 3.910 Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.  
>> 
>> I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 18 
>> feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 watts - 
>> even the 3.910 net. 
>> 
>> Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an amp. 
>> It seems people with higher power are the only only people who get heard. 
>> It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(
>> 
>> - Chad
>> 
>> 
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>> 
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rick Hiller  
> e-mail: rickhille...@gmail.com
> Cell:832-474-3713
> Physical: 9031 Troulon Drive

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Jimmy Vance via BVARC
What kind of radial field did you put down for the 6BTV?  You should 
also be ab;e to adjust the antenna for each band for a fairly low SWR 
where you don't need an antenna match


--jv




On 10/16/2020 7:45 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC wrote:
It’s a long run but no shorts.  Using LMR400 with a run 8 feet up the 
wall, 20 feet across the attic, 8 feet down the outside wall and into 
a mfg lightning arrestor, then to 50 feet of lmr 400 buried in conduit 
to my 6btv that had a 1:1 balun before feeding the antenna.  I’ve 
checkEd with an ohm meter and everything is good - no shorts.


Inside I have my 857d to my z-100 to my feed point which goes up the 
wall to the description above.


- Chad

On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:35 PM, Jonathan Guthrie via BVARC 
 wrote:



Several things.  First, the antenna analyzer won't tell you very 
much.  "The proper tool to assess antenna performance isn't an SWR 
meter, it's a field strength meter."  On the other hand, if you have 
a high SWR on your antenna, that might be causing your radio to 
dramatically reduce its power.  100 watts is certainly enough to 
communicate all over the USA.


Many of the problems I've had with low 80 dipoles were due to the 
coax.  You might check the coax for shorts and opens.  Back in the 
good old days, I used to have splices in my coax and they'd open 
sometimes.  I could check that by unscrewing the shield and if it got 
louder with just the center conductor in the SO-239, then I knew the 
feedline was bad.


On 10/16/20 7:17 PM, Chris Luppens via BVARC wrote:
I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first 
run antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody 
would lend you a Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would 


Chris Luppens


On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC 
 wrote:


Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with 
help.


I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 
12 ft. in the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My 
signal into the BVARC  HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually 
get checked in.  About the same with the Louisiana Traffic Net. 
  My brother over in Ruston, LA… KB7QL…..  often reports that I 
have a strong signal up there… about 300 miles.  He has a long loop 
up about 15 ft.    He often has a strong signal into Houston  on 
3910 kHz.


Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.

David  K5HEC




On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
 wrote:


I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan 
dipole from 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 
2019 I had dismal contacts with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.
Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT 
and have it tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum 
but I’ve made very few contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas 
Traffic Net and I try each day.  I might get a check in 2 times a 
month.  I have yet to be able to check into the 3.910 Wednesday 
net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.


I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v 
that’s 18 feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears 
me with 100 watts - even the 3.910 net.


Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to 
buy an amp. It seems people with higher power are the only only 
people who get heard. It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - 
just can work them.  :(


- Chad


Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org




Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



--
Jonathan Guthrie
ARS KA8KPN

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread KJ Anderson via BVARC
Thos is my opinion as well. Get a field strength meter, measure your output 
now. Move the radio and tuner to the feed point, rinse, repeat. The result will 
give you empirical loss on your feed line, sans VNA. Then report back?

-
KJ Anderson
253-380-2636
www.linkedin.com/in/scrumnerd<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/fdjAC2krXlhpLqmoH1kHNi?domain=linkedin.com>


From: Jeff Greer via BVARC 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 9:32 PM
To: Chad Kitzmann; BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
Cc: Jeff Greer
Subject: Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

Any chance of moving the tuner to the feedpoint?  With the tuner in the shack, 
it's making the match on the across the coax from where the mismatch actually 
is - at the antenna feedpoint - and you'll still be facing some coax loss.  
With the tuner at the feedpoint of the antenna, you should experience almost no 
coax loss.  This may not be your issue, but might be worth giving a shot one 
evening when the weather permits...


From: BVARC  on behalf of Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 

Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 8:03 PM
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
Cc: Chad Kitzmann ; Jonathan Guthrie 
Subject: Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

I dont have a ground on the ATU as I am in the middle of my house and would 
have to run one the same length of the coax I have to get outside - 40 plus 
feet up a wall and through my attic to my bonded ground outside where my 
lightning arrestor is.   But on a 12 volt DC system for my radio and  with 9 AA 
batteries running my ATU do I honestly need one?  What would be the difference 
if i was running outside off battery?

On Friday, October 16, 2020, 07:51:49 PM CDT, Clint Davidson via BVARC 
 wrote:


Here's something I learned from some more experienced operators a while back.  
If you are using a tuner, then ground it.  If the tuner is already grounded, 
then check your ground connections.
Best DX and 73


On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 7:35 PM Jonathan Guthrie via BVARC 
mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org>> wrote:
Several things.  First, the antenna analyzer won't tell you very much.  "The 
proper tool to assess antenna performance isn't an SWR meter, it's a field 
strength meter."  On the other hand, if you have a high SWR on your antenna, 
that might be causing your radio to dramatically reduce its power.  100 watts 
is certainly enough to communicate all over the USA.

Many of the problems I've had with low 80 dipoles were due to the coax.  You 
might check the coax for shorts and opens.  Back in the good old days, I used 
to have splices in my coax and they'd open sometimes.  I could check that by 
unscrewing the shield and if it got louder with just the center conductor in 
the SO-239, then I knew the feedline was bad.

On 10/16/20 7:17 PM, Chris Luppens via BVARC wrote:
I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first run 
antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody would lend you a 
Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would 

Chris Luppens


On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC 
<mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:

 Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.

I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft. in 
the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the BVARC  
HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About the same with 
the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA… KB7QL…..  often 
reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300 miles.  He has a long 
loop up about 15 ft.He often has a strong signal into Houston  on 3910 kHz.

Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.

David  K5HEC




On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
<mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:

I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole from 
2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal contacts 
with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.
Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very few 
contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.  I might 
get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check into the 3.910 
Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.

I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 18 
feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 watts - 
even the 3.910 net.

Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an amp. It 
seems people with higher power are the only only people who get heard. It’s 
very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(

- Chad


Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Jeff Greer via BVARC
Any chance of moving the tuner to the feedpoint?  With the tuner in the shack, 
it's making the match on the across the coax from where the mismatch actually 
is - at the antenna feedpoint - and you'll still be facing some coax loss.  
With the tuner at the feedpoint of the antenna, you should experience almost no 
coax loss.  This may not be your issue, but might be worth giving a shot one 
evening when the weather permits...


From: BVARC  on behalf of Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 

Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 8:03 PM
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
Cc: Chad Kitzmann ; Jonathan Guthrie 
Subject: Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

I dont have a ground on the ATU as I am in the middle of my house and would 
have to run one the same length of the coax I have to get outside - 40 plus 
feet up a wall and through my attic to my bonded ground outside where my 
lightning arrestor is.   But on a 12 volt DC system for my radio and  with 9 AA 
batteries running my ATU do I honestly need one?  What would be the difference 
if i was running outside off battery?

On Friday, October 16, 2020, 07:51:49 PM CDT, Clint Davidson via BVARC 
 wrote:


Here's something I learned from some more experienced operators a while back.  
If you are using a tuner, then ground it.  If the tuner is already grounded, 
then check your ground connections.
Best DX and 73


On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 7:35 PM Jonathan Guthrie via BVARC 
mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org>> wrote:
Several things.  First, the antenna analyzer won't tell you very much.  "The 
proper tool to assess antenna performance isn't an SWR meter, it's a field 
strength meter."  On the other hand, if you have a high SWR on your antenna, 
that might be causing your radio to dramatically reduce its power.  100 watts 
is certainly enough to communicate all over the USA.

Many of the problems I've had with low 80 dipoles were due to the coax.  You 
might check the coax for shorts and opens.  Back in the good old days, I used 
to have splices in my coax and they'd open sometimes.  I could check that by 
unscrewing the shield and if it got louder with just the center conductor in 
the SO-239, then I knew the feedline was bad.

On 10/16/20 7:17 PM, Chris Luppens via BVARC wrote:
I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first run 
antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody would lend you a 
Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would 

Chris Luppens


On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC 
<mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:

 Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.

I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft. in 
the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the BVARC  
HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About the same with 
the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA… KB7QL…..  often 
reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300 miles.  He has a long 
loop up about 15 ft.He often has a strong signal into Houston  on 3910 kHz.

Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.

David  K5HEC




On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
<mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:

I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole from 
2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal contacts 
with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.
Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very few 
contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.  I might 
get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check into the 3.910 
Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.

I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 18 
feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 watts - 
even the 3.910 net.

Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an amp. It 
seems people with higher power are the only only people who get heard. It’s 
very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(

- Chad


Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org<mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org>
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org<mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org>
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org




Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org<mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org>
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



--
Jonathan Guthrie
ARS KA8KPN


Brazos Valley Amateur 

Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
 I dont have a ground on the ATU as I am in the middle of my house and would 
have to run one the same length of the coax I have to get outside - 40 plus 
feet up a wall and through my attic to my bonded ground outside where my 
lightning arrestor is.   But on a 12 volt DC system for my radio and  with 9 AA 
batteries running my ATU do I honestly need one?  What would be the difference 
if i was running outside off battery?
On Friday, October 16, 2020, 07:51:49 PM CDT, Clint Davidson via BVARC 
 wrote:  
 
 Here's something I learned from some more experienced operators a while back.  
If you are using a tuner, then ground it.  If the tuner is already grounded, 
then check your ground connections.  Best DX and 73

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 7:35 PM Jonathan Guthrie via BVARC  
wrote:

  Several things.  First, the antenna analyzer won't tell you very much.  "The 
proper tool to assess antenna performance isn't an SWR meter, it's a field 
strength meter."  On the other hand, if you have a high SWR on your antenna, 
that might be causing your radio to dramatically reduce its power.  100 watts 
is certainly enough to communicate all over the USA.
  
  Many of the problems I've had with low 80 dipoles were due to the coax.  You 
might check the coax for shorts and opens.  Back in the good old days, I used 
to have splices in my coax and they'd open sometimes.  I could check that by 
unscrewing the shield and if it got louder with just the center conductor in 
the SO-239, then I knew the feedline was bad.
  
  On 10/16/20 7:17 PM, Chris Luppens via BVARC wrote:
  
 I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first run 
antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody would lend you a 
Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would  
 Chris Luppens
 
   
 
On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC  wrote:
 
 
  
  Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.  
 
 I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft. in 
the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the BVARC  
HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About the same with 
the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA… KB7QL…..  often 
reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300 miles.  He has a long 
loop up about 15 ft.    He often has a strong signal into Houston  on 3910 kHz. 
  
 
 Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.  
 
 David  K5HEC
 
 
 
 
 
On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:
 
 

 
 
I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole from 
2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal contacts 
with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.  
 
 
Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very few 
contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.  I might 
get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check into the 3.910 
Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.  
 
 

 
 
I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 18 
feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 watts - 
even the 3.910 net. 
 
 

 
 
Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an amp. It 
seems people with higher power are the only only people who get heard. It’s 
very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(
 
 

 
 
- Chad
 
 

 
 

 
 
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
 
 

 
 
BVARC mailing list
 
 
BVARC@bvarc.org
 
 
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
 
 
 
 
 Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
 
 BVARC mailing list
 BVARC@bvarc.org
 http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
  
  
  
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
 
 

 
 -- 
Jonathan Guthrie
ARS KA8KPN 
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



-- 
Clint Davidson
KF5HDF
713-870-0195
kf5...@gmail.com

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
  
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Clint Davidson via BVARC
Here's something I learned from some more experienced operators a while
back.  If you are using a tuner, then ground it.  If the tuner is already
grounded, then check your ground connections.
Best DX and 73


On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 7:35 PM Jonathan Guthrie via BVARC 
wrote:

> Several things.  First, the antenna analyzer won't tell you very much.
> "The proper tool to assess antenna performance isn't an SWR meter, it's a
> field strength meter."  On the other hand, if you have a high SWR on your
> antenna, that might be causing your radio to dramatically reduce its
> power.  100 watts is certainly enough to communicate all over the USA.
>
> Many of the problems I've had with low 80 dipoles were due to the coax.
> You might check the coax for shorts and opens.  Back in the good old days,
> I used to have splices in my coax and they'd open sometimes.  I could check
> that by unscrewing the shield and if it got louder with just the center
> conductor in the SO-239, then I knew the feedline was bad.
>
> On 10/16/20 7:17 PM, Chris Luppens via BVARC wrote:
>
> I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first run
> antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody would lend you
> a Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would 
>
> Chris Luppens
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC 
>  wrote:
>
>  Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.
>
> I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft.
> in the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the
> BVARC  HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About
> the same with the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA…
> KB7QL…..  often reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300
> miles.  He has a long loop up about 15 ft.He often has a strong signal
> into Houston  on 3910 kHz.
>
> Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.
>
> David  K5HEC
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
>  wrote:
>
>
> I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole
> from 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal
> contacts with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.
>
> Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have
> it tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very
> few contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.
> I might get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check
> into the 3.910 Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.
>
>
> I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s
> 18 feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100
> watts - even the 3.910 net.
>
>
> Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an
> amp. It seems people with higher power are the only only people who get
> heard. It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(
>
>
> - Chad
>
>
> 
>
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
>
> BVARC mailing list
>
> BVARC@bvarc.org
>
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>
>
>
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>
>
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing 
> listBVARC@bvarc.orghttp://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Guthrie
> ARS KA8KPN
>
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>


-- 
Clint Davidson
KF5HDF
713-870-0195
kf5...@gmail.com

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
It’s a long run but no shorts.  Using LMR400 with a run 8 feet up the wall, 20 
feet across the attic, 8 feet down the outside wall and into a mfg lightning 
arrestor, then to 50 feet of lmr 400 buried in conduit to my 6btv that had a 
1:1 balun before feeding the antenna.  I’ve checkEd with an ohm meter and 
everything is good - no shorts.

Inside I have my 857d to my z-100 to my feed point which goes up the wall to 
the description above. 

- Chad

> On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:35 PM, Jonathan Guthrie via BVARC  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Several things.  First, the antenna analyzer won't tell you very much.  "The 
> proper tool to assess antenna performance isn't an SWR meter, it's a field 
> strength meter."  On the other hand, if you have a high SWR on your antenna, 
> that might be causing your radio to dramatically reduce its power.  100 watts 
> is certainly enough to communicate all over the USA.
> 
> Many of the problems I've had with low 80 dipoles were due to the coax.  You 
> might check the coax for shorts and opens.  Back in the good old days, I used 
> to have splices in my coax and they'd open sometimes.  I could check that by 
> unscrewing the shield and if it got louder with just the center conductor in 
> the SO-239, then I knew the feedline was bad.
> 
> On 10/16/20 7:17 PM, Chris Luppens via BVARC wrote:
>> I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first run 
>> antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody would lend you a 
>> Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would 
>> 
>> Chris Luppens
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.  
>>> 
>>> I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft. 
>>> in the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the 
>>> BVARC  HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About 
>>> the same with the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA… 
>>> KB7QL…..  often reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300 
>>> miles.  He has a long loop up about 15 ft.He often has a strong signal 
>>> into Houston  on 3910 kHz.   
>>> 
>>> Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.  
>>> 
>>> David  K5HEC
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  
 wrote:
 
 I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole 
 from 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal 
 contacts with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.  
 Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have 
 it tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made 
 very few contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each 
 day.  I might get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to 
 check into the 3.910 Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can 
 hear me.  
 
 I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 
 18 feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 
 watts - even the 3.910 net. 
 
 Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an 
 amp. It seems people with higher power are the only only people who get 
 heard. It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(
 
 - Chad
 
 
 Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
 
 BVARC mailing list
 BVARC@bvarc.org
 http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>> 
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>> 
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> 
> -- 
> Jonathan Guthrie
> ARS KA8KPN
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Jonathan Guthrie via BVARC
Several things.  First, the antenna analyzer won't tell you very much.  
"The proper tool to assess antenna performance isn't an SWR meter, it's 
a field strength meter."  On the other hand, if you have a high SWR on 
your antenna, that might be causing your radio to dramatically reduce 
its power.  100 watts is certainly enough to communicate all over the USA.


Many of the problems I've had with low 80 dipoles were due to the coax.  
You might check the coax for shorts and opens.  Back in the good old 
days, I used to have splices in my coax and they'd open sometimes.  I 
could check that by unscrewing the shield and if it got louder with just 
the center conductor in the SO-239, then I knew the feedline was bad.


On 10/16/20 7:17 PM, Chris Luppens via BVARC wrote:
I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first 
run antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody would 
lend you a Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would 


Chris Luppens


On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC 
 wrote:


Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.

I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 
12 ft. in the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My 
signal into the BVARC  HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get 
checked in.  About the same with the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My 
brother over in Ruston, LA… KB7QL…..  often reports that I have a 
strong signal up there… about 300 miles.  He has a long loop up about 
15 ft.    He often has a strong signal into Houston  on 3910 kHz.


Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.

David  K5HEC




On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC 
 wrote:


I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan 
dipole from 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 
I had dismal contacts with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.
Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and 
have it tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but 
I’ve made very few contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic 
Net and I try each day.  I might get a check in 2 times a month.  I 
have yet to be able to check into the 3.910 Wednesday net.  I can 
hear everyone but no one can hear me.


I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v 
that’s 18 feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears 
me with 100 watts - even the 3.910 net.


Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy 
an amp. It seems people with higher power are the only only people 
who get heard. It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can 
work them.  :(


- Chad


Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org




Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



--
Jonathan Guthrie
ARS KA8KPN


Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
I have a mfj 259c.  Measuring and tuning the antennas with a 15 foot piece of 
cable swr is less than 2:1 where I am broadcasting. and I have a LDG z-100 that 
I run on the 857d and tune. 

- Chad

> On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:18 PM, Chris Luppens via BVARC  wrote:
> 
> I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first run 
> antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody would lend you a 
> Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would 
> 
> Chris Luppens
> 
> 
>>> On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>  Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.  
>> 
>> I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft. 
>> in the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the 
>> BVARC  HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About the 
>> same with the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA… 
>> KB7QL…..  often reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300 
>> miles.  He has a long loop up about 15 ft.He often has a strong signal 
>> into Houston  on 3910 kHz.   
>> 
>> Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.  
>> 
>> David  K5HEC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole 
>>> from 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal 
>>> contacts with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.  
>>> Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
>>> tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very 
>>> few contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.  
>>> I might get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check 
>>> into the 3.910 Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.  
>>> 
>>> I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 18 
>>> feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 watts 
>>> - even the 3.910 net. 
>>> 
>>> Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an 
>>> amp. It seems people with higher power are the only only people who get 
>>> heard. It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(
>>> 
>>> - Chad
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>> 
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>> 
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Chris Luppens via BVARC
I am also learning  but way behind you. But I think you should first run 
antenna analyzer to be sure no issues there. I bet somebody would lend you a 
Rig Stick or VNA unit, I would 

Chris Luppens


> On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC  
> wrote:
> 
>  Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.  
> 
> I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft. in 
> the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the BVARC 
>  HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About the same 
> with the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA… KB7QL…..  
> often reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300 miles.  He has 
> a long loop up about 15 ft.He often has a strong signal into Houston  on 
> 3910 kHz.   
> 
> Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.  
> 
> David  K5HEC
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:
>> 
>> I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole 
>> from 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal 
>> contacts with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.  
>> Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
>> tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very few 
>> contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.  I 
>> might get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check into 
>> the 3.910 Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.  
>> 
>> I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 18 
>> feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 watts - 
>> even the 3.910 net. 
>> 
>> Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an amp. 
>> It seems people with higher power are the only only people who get heard. 
>> It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(
>> 
>> - Chad
>> 
>> 
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>> 
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> 
> 
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread Chad Kitzmann via BVARC
I built the 40/80 dipole to be NVIS sine the verticals in more of a DX antenna. 
  To add more detail I have 48 radials on the 6btv.  

- Chad

> On Oct 16, 2020, at 7:10 PM, DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC  
> wrote:
> 
>  Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.  
> 
> I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft. in 
> the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the BVARC 
>  HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About the same 
> with the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA… KB7QL…..  
> often reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300 miles.  He has 
> a long loop up about 15 ft.He often has a strong signal into Houston  on 
> 3910 kHz.   
> 
> Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.  
> 
> David  K5HEC
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:
>> 
>> I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole 
>> from 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal 
>> contacts with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.  
>> Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
>> tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very few 
>> contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.  I 
>> might get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check into 
>> the 3.910 Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.  
>> 
>> I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 18 
>> feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 watts - 
>> even the 3.910 net. 
>> 
>> Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an amp. 
>> It seems people with higher power are the only only people who get heard. 
>> It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(
>> 
>> - Chad
>> 
>> 
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>> 
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> 
> 
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Looking for HF Help

2020-10-16 Thread DAVID M GRAY JR via BVARC
 Keep experiencing.   I bet somebody in BVARC will come thru with help.  

I have an off-center fed dipole about 135 ft. total length up about 12 ft. in 
the back yard… I’m near N. Eldridge Pkw and Tanner.  My signal into the BVARC  
HF Wednesday net  is minimal but I usually get checked in.  About the same with 
the Louisiana Traffic Net.   My brother over in Ruston, LA… KB7QL…..  often 
reports that I have a strong signal up there… about 300 miles.  He has a long 
loop up about 15 ft.He often has a strong signal into Houston  on 3910 kHz. 
  

Keep trying  and I bet things will begin to change for you.  

David  K5HEC




> On Oct 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Chad Kitzmann via BVARC  wrote:
> 
> I’ve been a Ham since 2017 and have an 857d.  Running a multi fan dipole from 
> 2017 until I had to cut the tree down it was in in 2019 I had dismal contacts 
> with anyone on 80, 40, and 20.  
> Covid gave me some time to be at home and I setup a Hustler 6BT and have it 
> tuned with my MFJ 269c.   I know it’s a solar minimum but I’ve made very few 
> contact.  I can hardly reach the Texas Traffic Net and I try each day.  I 
> might get a check in 2 times a month.  I have yet to be able to check into 
> the 3.910 Wednesday net.  I can hear everyone but no one can hear me.  
> 
> I recently built an 40/80 meter coil dipole that is an inverted v that’s 18 
> feet at the center and 6 feet at the ends - nobody hears me with 100 watts - 
> even the 3.910 net. 
> 
> Is 100 watts just too little these days?  Should I be looking to buy an amp. 
> It seems people with higher power are the only only people who get heard. 
> It’s very discouraging.   I can hear them - just can work them.  :(
> 
> - Chad
> 
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org