Hi
I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to connect to a proprietary-protocol emailserver and expose IMAP functionality.
I do not wish to import all emails into a flat-file and feed it into the IMAP server, but rather integrate to it by implementing some pre-defined interface that the
Nick Birren wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to connect to a
proprietary-protocol email server and expose IMAP functionality.
I do not wish to import all emails into a flat-file and feed it into
the IMAP server, but rather integrate to it by implementing some
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Nick Birren wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to connect to a
proprietary-protocol email server and expose IMAP functionality. I do
not wish to import all emails into a flat-file and feed it into the IMAP
server, but rather integrate to it by implementing
Cool. Any recommended reading material for writing c-client drivers?
Thanks
-NickMark Crispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Nick Birren wrote: I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to connect to a proprietary-protocol email server and expose IMAP functionality. I do not wish
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Nick Birren wrote:
Cool. Any recommended reading material for writing c-client drivers?
I would start with using the latest sources (imap-2004 RC6) instead of
the release version (imap-2002e).
Inside the imap-2004/docs/ directory there is a file called internal.txt
which
Compile c-client the normal way (nmake /f makefile.nt) to get the c-client
directory created and all the files copied.
Go to MSVC and create a project for c-client for static library and add the
files in c-client (you can't add all of them, only the ones that c-client
need, look in the makefile).
My feeling about hashed spool directories is that this functionality is
site-specific, with no obvious single definition of how it is to be
implemented that applies in all instances. Consequently, I consider it to
be something that should always be of the form of a third-party patch
rather
Sorry, I forgot to include the attachment.
Cheers.
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 05:59:13PM -0500, Matt Selsky wrote:
My feeling about hashed spool directories is that this functionality is
site-specific, with no obvious single definition of how it is to be
implemented that applies in all
