Re: possible imaprc.txt erratum

2005-04-19 Thread Mark Brand
Mark, The text is correct. If INBOX is an empty file, it defaults to the system standard (which is traditional UNIX format on most systems, but MMDF on SCO). I see your point. Empty means empty in the sense of contains zero bytes rather than contains zero messages (since it describes a file

Re: set new-folder-format same-as-inbox broken?

2005-04-19 Thread Mark Brand
Could it be that set new-folder-format same-as-inbox documented in http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/imaprc.txt.html does not work in imap-2004c1? I have done a bunch of tests with this and it seems to have no effect when the INBOX is in mbx format. It works for me. I just tried

Re: possible imaprc.txt erratum

2005-04-19 Thread Mark Crispin
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Mark Brand wrote: But still, even with this understanding, what happens if there is no INBOX at all? That's where magic begins. You'll have to read the code in the dummy driver to understand. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting,

Re: possible imaprc.txt erratum

2005-04-19 Thread Mark Brand
But still, even with this understanding, what happens if there is no INBOX at all? That's where magic begins. You'll have to read the code in the dummy driver to understand. Now that you mention it, I had noticed a number of almost supernatural properties in imap. Probably because the