Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
In case it matters, this is what I'm using with configure: configure: Report: configure: File Manager: POSIX configure: Mutex Manager: POSIX configure: Transcoder: icu configure: NetAccessor: socket configure: Message Loader: inmemory Any of those different in your build that's giving different output? -- Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
On 6 Mar 2015, at 14:22, Cantor, Scott canto...@osu.edu wrote: On 3/6/15, 4:17 AM, Gareth Reakes gar...@reakes.com wrote: On OSX compiles fine but test run produces this attached failure diff. Compared to 3.1.1 you mean? No, compared to the committed test output file - scripts/sanityTest_ExpectedResult.log How do the tests get run as a unit? make check Do you know which test is giving that different result? # Run SAXPrint. This tests long element names. print (\nTest of a long element name.\n); system (SAXPrint -v=never long.xml); print (\n\n); G
Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
On 3/6/15, 9:34 AM, Gareth Reakes gar...@reakes.com wrote: On OSX compiles fine but test run produces this attached failure diff. Somewhat surprisingly, on my OS X laptop, my test run has identical output to what's checked in, no diff. But I did that out of subversion, not the tarball, so I'll rerun the check with the tarball. -- Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
On 3/6/15, 4:17 AM, Gareth Reakes gar...@reakes.com wrote: On OSX compiles fine but test run produces this attached failure diff. Compared to 3.1.1 you mean? How do the tests get run as a unit? Do you know which test is giving that different result? -- Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
On 3/6/15, 9:34 AM, Gareth Reakes gar...@reakes.com wrote: No, compared to the committed test output file - scripts/sanityTest_ExpectedResult.log Ok, I'll look at when that was committed. make check So it runs them as part of the test build? Ok, I didn't notice that, will review that. -- Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
On 3/6/15, 10:08 AM, Gareth Reakes gar...@reakes.com wrote: Do you have the file in your checkout? /xerces-c-3.1.2/samples/data/long.xml No, it's not in the dist target, so that's the problem. I'll add it and republish a third beta today. One of the things I'm trying to clean up is the dist. It was quite incomplete, which is a bad thing in general, it's important that it include everything needed for every platform. I left the tools that rebuild the web site out for the moment, because those are pretty large, and the site inside the tree appears to be stale anyway, but everything else I'm trying to include. -- Scott
Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
On 6 Mar 2015, at 15:00, Cantor, Scott canto...@osu.edu wrote: On 3/6/15, 9:34 AM, Gareth Reakes gar...@reakes.com wrote: On OSX compiles fine but test run produces this attached failure diff. Somewhat surprisingly, on my OS X laptop, my test run has identical output to what's checked in, no diff. But I did that out of subversion, not the tarball, so I'll rerun the check with the tarball. Do you have the file in your checkout? /xerces-c-3.1.2/samples/data/long.xml G - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
On 6 Mar 2015, at 15:04, Cantor, Scott canto...@osu.edu wrote: In case it matters, this is what I'm using with configure: configure: Report: configure: File Manager: POSIX configure: Mutex Manager: POSIX configure: Transcoder: icu configure: NetAccessor: socket configure: Message Loader: inmemory Yes, they are different. I did ./configure with no options. configure: Report: configure: File Manager: POSIX configure: Mutex Manager: POSIX configure: Transcoder: macosunicodeconverter configure: NetAccessor: curl configure: Message Loader: inmemory F
Re: Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
On OSX compiles fine but test run produces this attached failure diff. G diff Description: Binary data On 6 Mar 2015, at 02:38, Cantor, Scott canto...@osu.edu wrote: I've uploaded a second beta of Xerces-C 3.1.2 [2] containing a couple of small fixes (VS2012 solution file fix, a backport of an XMLString binToText bug reported yesterday) and a tweak to the automake settings so I can generate a ZIP distribution from make dist. Just want to keep the test sources current. Thank you to everybody who's smoke tested. I have tried to run a few of the programs in test/ and they mostly did ok but one actually crashed (the DOM Normalizer test). I then reproduced the exact same exception crash using the 3.1.1 sources, so this isn't a regression, it was already behaving that way. I'm guessing the tests are out of date in some cases, but I don't know them well enough to look at it. -- Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
Xerces-C 3.1.2 beta-2 available, call for testing
I've uploaded a second beta of Xerces-C 3.1.2 [2] containing a couple of small fixes (VS2012 solution file fix, a backport of an XMLString binToText bug reported yesterday) and a tweak to the automake settings so I can generate a ZIP distribution from make dist. Just want to keep the test sources current. Thank you to everybody who's smoke tested. I have tried to run a few of the programs in test/ and they mostly did ok but one actually crashed (the DOM Normalizer test). I then reproduced the exact same exception crash using the 3.1.1 sources, so this isn't a regression, it was already behaving that way. I'm guessing the tests are out of date in some cases, but I don't know them well enough to look at it. -- Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
