On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Here's the equivalent bit of my design (the TestResult is the same):
data TestInstance
= TestInstance {
run :: IO TestResult
name :: String,
concurrentSafe :: Bool,
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Actually, we need more than this. We need to be able to do IO to
enumerate the tests in the group.
Consider the ghc tests suite. It is an interesting and reasonably
large scale example. I think we ought to make
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 03:48:05PM +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Duncan Coutts
T5636 (ghci, opt, prof)
So what if in addition to this system of test options (inputs) we had
a similar declarative system for describing test attributes. What
might it look
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 15:39 +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Here's the equivalent bit of my design (the TestResult is the same):
data TestInstance
= TestInstance {
run:: IO TestResult
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
So in your other email you suggest a simple attribute system where we
use a set of named tags, but with no meanings that a generic test agent
will know about, just to be used as way for users to filter on tests.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:02:25PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:16:12PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
The generated paths module has to compile with the target
compiler, including older ghc
Why? People who really are stuck with GHC 6.8 already have a Cabal that
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 03:54:24PM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:02:25PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:16:12PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
The generated paths module has to compile with the target
compiler, including older ghc
Why?
#847: Cabal ignores multiple test options given with --test-option{,s}
+---
Reporter: ttuegel|Owner: ttuegel
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: normal |
#811: test-suite type not detected
+---
Reporter: basvandijk |Owner: ttuegel
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal |Milestone: Cabal-1.10
Component: Cabal
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
data TestInstance
= TestInstance {
run :: IO TestResult
name :: String,
concurrentSafe :: Bool,
expectedFail :: Bool,
options :: [OptionDescr]
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm worried about generalizing from a single instance (i.e. GHC).
If we'd like to add some flexibility we could allow tests to carry
arbitrary tags:
class TestInstance a where
tags :: a - [String]
Test agents
1 patch for repository http://darcs.haskell.org/cabal:
Mon May 23 20:45:34 BST 2011 hask...@benmachine.co.uk
* Add missing space in QA message
New patches:
[Add missing space in QA message
hask...@benmachine.co.uk**20110523194534
Ignore-this: f822926bda9cf9b479faf4f70b67590a
] hunk
On 21 May 2011 15:20, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
data Test = forall i r t. Testlike i r t = Test TestName t
| TestGroup TestName [Test]
| PlusTestOptions TestOptions Test
FYI, I recently added another alternative:
| BuildTest (IO Test)
The main
13 matches
Mail list logo
