On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 25-02-2015 19:21, lennart spitzner wrote:
>> I am not convinced. how does closing ~40 out of ~700 open tickets make
>> the contributors more effective? that demand exceeds resources is
>> true, but it is no argument for closing issues.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:21 PM, lennart spitzner
wrote:
> I am not convinced. how does closing ~40 out of ~700 open tickets make
> the contributors more effective? that demand exceeds resources is
> true, but it is no argument for closing issues. many of the issues
> represent sensible ideas for
On 25-02-2015 19:36, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 25-02-2015 19:21, lennart spitzner wrote:
>> I'd say the general lack of stability and the recently mentioned
>> lack of tests are the main problems of Cabal;
>> to a degree this looks like shooting at symptoms.
>
> That may certainly be the case.
On 25-02-2015 19:21, lennart spitzner wrote:
> I am not convinced. how does closing ~40 out of ~700 open tickets make
> the contributors more effective? that demand exceeds resources is
> true, but it is no argument for closing issues. many of the issues
> represent sensible ideas for features that
I am not convinced. how does closing ~40 out of ~700 open tickets make
the contributors more effective? that demand exceeds resources is
true, but it is no argument for closing issues. many of the issues
represent sensible ideas for features that do not need new feedback.
I'd say the general lack
