On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:30 AM Bardur Arantsson
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just to get input from as many people as possible: I was pondering a
> plan for modularizing the solver[1] and wanted to reach as many people
> as possible with my question:
>
>Is anybody is still using the top-down solver?
I doubt this list has good coverage. You probably should try haskell-cafe?
Another way to put this question:
Is anybody is still using GHC 6.x?
Cheers,
Oleg
> On 09 Nov 2015, at 06:29, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just to get input from as many people as possible: I was ponderin
On 11/09/2015 05:57 AM, Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Bardur Arantsson
> wrote:
>
>> Just to get input from as many people as possible: I was pondering a
>> plan for modularizing the solver[1] and wanted to reach as many people
>> as possible with my question:
>>
>>Is
On 11/09/2015 05:57 AM, Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Bardur Arantsson
> wrote:
>
>> Just to get input from as many people as possible: I was pondering a
>> plan for modularizing the solver[1] and wanted to reach as many people
>> as possible with my question:
>>
>>Is
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Bardur Arantsson
wrote:
> Just to get input from as many people as possible: I was pondering a
> plan for modularizing the solver[1] and wanted to reach as many people
> as possible with my question:
>
>Is anybody is still using the top-down solver?
>
Cabal-d
Hi all,
Just to get input from as many people as possible: I was pondering a
plan for modularizing the solver[1] and wanted to reach as many people
as possible with my question:
Is anybody is still using the top-down solver?
Please respond to this list if you are, especially if you're doing s