Hi Daniel,
On 27 December 2017 at 17:43, Daniel Trstenjak
wrote:
> Most likely the stability of the pretty printing of a
> GenericPackageDescription
> isn't considered that important.
>
> I just wanted to mention that the order of fields in the stanzas changed
> from 'Cabal 1.24/2.0' to the curr
Most likely the stability of the pretty printing of a GenericPackageDescription
isn't considered that important.
I just wanted to mention that the order of fields in the stanzas changed
from 'Cabal 1.24/2.0' to the current HEAD.
Greetings,
Daniel
name: setup-config
version: 0.1
cabal-version: >=1
Hi Oleg,
On 27 December 2017 at 17:17, Oleg Grenrus wrote:
> I had a good success with completing a lot of parser work around Christmas,
> still on my todo list are:
>
> - rewriting InstalledPackageInfo parser&printer using new (parsec)
> framework, which is (soft) prerequisite to
> - changing li
I had a good success with completing a lot of parser work around Christmas,
still on my todo list are:
- rewriting InstalledPackageInfo parser&printer using new (parsec) framework,
which is (soft) prerequisite to
- changing license field to use SPDX expressions
SPDX types are already merged, so
