> On Jan 27, 2022, at 10:00, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant via Cake
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 25 Jan 2022, at 10:58, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> Matt Johnston writes:
>>
>>> The CS1 priority (index 0x08) was changed from 0 to 1 when LE (index
>>> 0x01) was added. This looks
Hi Matt,
> On Jan 27, 2022, at 04:14, Matt Johnston wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 12:54 +0100, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> LE(1) is tin 0 the lowest
>> CS1(8) is 1 slightly above LE
>> CS0/BE(0) is 2
>> AF1x (10, 12, 14) are all in tin 1 as is CS1
> ...
>> Just as documented in the
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 12:54 +0100, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
> LE(1) is tin 0 the lowest
> CS1(8) is 1 slightly above LE
> CS0/BE(0) is 2
> AF1x (10, 12, 14) are all in tin 1 as is CS1
...
> Just as documented in the code:
>
> *Bog Standard (CS0 etc.)
> *
> On 25 Jan 2022, at 10:58, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Matt Johnston writes:
>
>> The CS1 priority (index 0x08) was changed from 0 to 1 when LE (index
>> 0x01) was added. This looks unintentional, it doesn't match the
>> docs and CS1 shouldn't be the same tin as AF1x
>
> Hmm, Kevin,
