Re: [Cake] Cake, low speed ADSL & fwmark

2020-07-28 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cake
Jim Geo writes: >> >> > On 28 Jul, 2020, at 12:41 am, Jim Geo wrote: >> > >> > Thank you for all the efforts you have done to make internet usable. >> > >> > I currently use htb & fq_codel in my low speed ADSL 6Mbps downlink/1 Mbps >> > uplink. I use fwmark to control both uplink and downlink

Re: [Cake] Cake, low speed ADSL & fwmark

2020-07-28 Thread Jonathan Morton
> On 28 Jul, 2020, at 7:51 pm, Jim Geo wrote: > > Thanks for the info! I've noticed that by using 0xF, marks 1-4 become > tins 0-3. Tin 0 is special? I assumed it's for bulk traffic. I use > diffserv8. Mark 0 (not tin 0) is special because it corresponds to "no mark set". Otherwise, what you

Re: [Cake] Cake, low speed ADSL & fwmark

2020-07-28 Thread Jim Geo
> > > On 28 Jul, 2020, at 12:41 am, Jim Geo wrote: > > > > Thank you for all the efforts you have done to make internet usable. > > > > I currently use htb & fq_codel in my low speed ADSL 6Mbps downlink/1 Mbps > > uplink. I use fwmark to control both uplink and downlink with good results > > in

Re: [Cake] Cake, low speed ADSL & fwmark

2020-07-28 Thread Y via Cake
Hi,all My situation is/was similer. I prefer to use cake because it costs lower cpu time than htb + fq_codel. tc qdisc add root dev eth0 cake bandwidth 810kbit pppoa-vcmux diffserv4 ack-filter-aggressive dual-srchost pi@raspberrypi:~ $ tc -s qdisc show dev eth0 qdisc cake 8023: root refcnt 2