We had a ton of email bounce last week.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:21:55AM -0500, Nick Hall via Starlink wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've had a Starlink (the round version 1) for around a year and was
> thinking about bufferbloat yesterday and just found your mailing list. I
> just started looking at the
On 3/2/17 11:51 AM, Stijn Segers wrote:
> Thanks Sebastian, turned out to be a silly syntax error, I have it all
> disabled now. Ethtool -k and ethtool -K printing/requiring different
> stuff doesn't help of course :-)
>
> I re-enabled SQM, will see how that works out with the offloading disable
On 2/14/17 12:56 AM, Pete Heist wrote:
>
>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:21 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> It would be my hope that 802.11e is off (rrul will show this, and we
>> still do badly with it on)
>
> Does this mean to try disabling WMM (uci set wireless.default_radio0.wmm='0’)?
>
> That’s how
tell you anything else :)
It is great to have friends (in places high and low). Thank you!
That said, I almost, but not quite, got the dkim stuff working the other
day - not that I can intuit that was the source of the problem!
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 at 17:10 Dave Täht <mailto:d...@taht
it up with postfix + mailman 2.
And thank you for poking so deeply into this, I was A) really annoyed by
the bloat-list-as-spam thing and B) clueless.
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 at 15:42 Dave Täht <mailto:d...@taht.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/30/16 1:02 AM, Toke Høi
On 9/30/16 1:02 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Neil Shepperd writes:
>
>> I think I have now accumulated enough spam/nonspam classified emails
>> to make a statistically signification observation: it seems like all
>> emails classified as spam from these lists were send from ipv6:
>>
>> SP
http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/Cake-compiled-for-the-ERL/m-p/1679844
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
10us
>>> pkts 23772
>>> bytes 10352566
>>> way_inds 0
>>> way_miss 295
>>> way_cols 0
>>> drops 56
>>> marks 0
>>> sp_flows 1
>>>
On 7/16/16 1:53 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>
>
> On 16/07/16 11:59, Dave Täht wrote:
>> I would repeat the same test with htb+fq_codel.
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> That's more challenging than it sounds - reproducing the test scenario
> would require the wi
I would repeat the same test with htb+fq_codel.
On 7/16/16 11:35 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Encountering some behaviour that I don't understand. Line is a 40/10
> cake limited to 39000/9840. Overheads 12, 'dual-dsthosts' in ingress,
> 'dual-srcshosts' on engress - limiting
It is generally my hope that ipv6 nat will not be widely deployed.
Firewalls will be stateful instead, and thus there would be no need to
access the conntrack information for ipv6 in cake.
I'm not sure, however, to
what extent ipv6 conntrack is in openwrt today, certainly udp and tcp,
"in" is ess
I still think squashing is very important, and essentially required by
several rfcs.
On 6/1/16 3:02 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> To try and keep everyone in the loop this has also been sent to the cake
> list.
>
> LR;DR - There's a pull request to the LEDE tree to integrate cake as a
> p
1) I am all in favor of continued experimentation and coding in these areas.
2) However I strongly advise the first thing you attempt to do when
futzing with an aqm, is to try it at various RTTs, and then do it at
high bandwidths and low.
Some of the discussion below makes me nervous, in that a p
As I have accumulated enough hardware to do some basic cake testing
again, I spent a bit of time trying to get it to build, and did not
succeed.
There has been some activity in the world (discussed at the netconf
conference - I was not there so I lack details) about modifying how
ingress works, so
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=50914 as of feb 13th has many
features (like having the luci-ssl gui native, sqm-scripts, and support
for nearly all the platforms I have handy (c7v2, linksys 1200ac, wndr
4800 and 4300))... so I replaced a c7v2 router as my default home
gateway to see how
On 1/18/16 2:11 PM, Jeff Weeks wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm wondering if there's some data on Codel with low shape rates?
>
> In particular, I'm talking about in the kbps ranges.
We recently did some testing of several codel variants at very low rates
(2mbit/384kbit asymmetric). One flent datas
16 matches
Mail list logo
