> On 20 Sep, 2018, at 4:39 am, Ruben wrote:
>
> > There's no counter for ecn marked packets in bytes, so it's impossible to
> > implement it that way, too.
> >
> > ECN-Marks is in packets, so everything else need to be in packets as
> > well.
>
> Hmm, so the obvious follow-up question
Hey Toke,Am 19.09.2018 11:11 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :Ruben writes:
> Hey Toke,
>
> Am 13.09.2018 21:12 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
>
>
> Ruben writes:
>
> > Hey Toke,
> >
> > Thanks for your fast response!
> >
> > Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb
Hey Dave,Am 19.09.2018 19:01 schrieb Dave Taht :On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:11 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Ruben writes:
>
> > Hey Toke,
> >
> > Am 13.09.2018 21:12 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
> >
> >
> > Ruben writes:
> >
> > > Hey Toke,
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:11 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Ruben writes:
>
> > Hey Toke,
> >
> > Am 13.09.2018 21:12 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
> >
> >
> > Ruben writes:
> >
> > > Hey Toke,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your fast response!
> > >
> > > Am 13.09.2018
Ruben writes:
> Hey Toke,
>
> Am 13.09.2018 21:12 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
>
>
> Ruben writes:
>
> > Hey Toke,
> >
> > Thanks for your fast response!
> >
> > Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
> >
> >
> > Ruben writes:
> >
>
Hey Toke,Am 13.09.2018 21:12 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :Ruben writes:
> Hey Toke,
>
> Thanks for your fast response!
>
> Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
>
>
> Ruben writes:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I've already mentioned this in a response
Ruben writes:
> Hey Toke,
>
> Thanks for your fast response!
>
> Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
>
>
> Ruben writes:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I've already mentioned this in a response to dtaht on GitHub, but here
> > again for everyone:
> >
> > I
Hey Toke,Thanks for your fast response!Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :Ruben writes:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've already mentioned this in a response to dtaht on GitHub, but here
> again for everyone:
>
> I was wondering if it's possible to extend the tin statistics by
>
Ruben writes:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've already mentioned this in a response to dtaht on GitHub, but here
> again for everyone:
>
> I was wondering if it's possible to extend the tin statistics by
> packets for backlog.
Why do you need packets when there's already bytes?
> Also I haven't found
Hey guys, I've already mentioned this in a response to dtaht on GitHub, but here again for everyone:I was wondering if it's possible to extend the tin statistics by packets for backlog.Also I haven't found details on the man page, but haven't looked in the code how exactly flows are defined for
Hey guys,I wasn't aware that there's any munin-plugin for cake out there... so I wrote two simple ones:https://github.com/munin-monitoring/contrib/pull/941Feel free to let me know what your thinking, critism is highly appreciated.Also I thought to write one to track the used bandwidth, the avg
11 matches
Mail list logo