Since its not up yet on the bakery, here's a version on my new blog:
http://www.experiment621.com/2008/07/phpthumb-helper/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send
Since its not up yet on the bakery, here's a version of the helper on
my new blog:
http://www.experiment621.com/2008/07/phpthumb-helper/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post
I with Villa. Im no cake Guru, but I would love to provide support,
and reviewing bakery submissions seems like a task I could handle.
On Jul 14, 7:09 pm, villas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes sir, I would volunteer! To be honest, I would put myself in the
bottom quartile of Cake
Sounds awesome - you sure that link works?
On Jul 14, 12:56 am, DanielMedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Just added an article to the bakery. Its a phpThumb helper with cache
support for 1.2:
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/phpthumb-helper-2
Hope someone finds some use
Looks like it hasn't been approved yet on the bakery. Hopefully it'll
go live soon.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To
It can take a while.
I added an article, which took about 2 weeks to get approved, and on
the day it was live a user requested a feature addition.
Unfortunately I didn't know that editing the article would get it
delisted again, so that I'm currently waiting for it to get approved
once again -
Wow... 2 weeks? I didn't realize it could take that long. Or that
editing would make it unpublished again. This was my first time
submitting an article. Thanks for the info Duncan.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
That's such a pity if the Bakery wouldn't be supported for such an
avoidable reason. Surely the Cake team can just increase the number of
trusted Bakery administrators so that there is always someone on
'duty'. Why not have 20 reviewers, or more? It seems so strange in
such an active and
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:55 PM, villas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's such a pity if the Bakery wouldn't be supported for such an
avoidable reason. Surely the Cake team can just increase the number of
trusted Bakery administrators so that there is always someone on
'duty'. Why not have 20
Yes sir, I would volunteer! To be honest, I would put myself in the
bottom quartile of Cake skillfullness, but I reckon I still know
enough to spot abuse and give a timely thumbs up to a well-written
article.
I would propose a simple posting to this group would produce many
excellent
Hi all,
Just added an article to the bakery. Its a phpThumb helper with cache
support for 1.2:
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/phpthumb-helper-2
Hope someone finds some use in it.
- Dan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
11 matches
Mail list logo
