I think one more release before the end of the year is doable. We may be a
bit shorter on resources leading up to the end of the year as folks are
starting to take vacations.
We should schedule another issue review for early next week. That would be
the time most folks would be available as many w
Si +1
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> The subject says it all. If we're going to change it sooner is better.
> We had rough consensus for Cordova in earlier threads so lets make it
> official.
>
> +1
>
Can't wait to see it. We gotta get this Apache move done and get on with
making the sausage.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Michael Brooks wrote:
> Hey Andrew,
>
> Yea, we created a PhoneGap plugin called phonegap-plugin-menu that
> implemented the
We have an old issue still open:
https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-android/issues/238
and basically the root cause of the problem is that we set the max
size of an applications database to be 100 MB.
We have a couple of options available to fix this issue:
1) Do nothing there is a work aroun
d time,
> rather than having to write some java code to do it.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>> We have an old issue still open:
>>
>> https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-android/issues/238
>>
>> and basically the root cause of
I just did a pull request to remove addWhiteList from Android. If we
are all in a agreement that it should be removed on our Monday call I
will merge the request.
https://github.com/callback/callback-android/pull/41
Also, for anything that isn't implemented on iOS do you thing we
should have a no
+1
On Friday, November 25, 2011, Dave Johnson wrote:
> can we schedule a monthly meeting of this sort so that it's easier for
> people to make sure they are free?
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>> 2011-11-28 at 11:00 AM.
>>
>> https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/207561816
The .js file are platform dependent. The API exposed is the same though.
People are working on making the .js the same for all platforms.
Simon
On Saturday, November 26, 2011, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I created a phonegap project with Xcode and one for Eclipse. Then I
> compa
Seems reasonable to me. Did you see this blog post from the guy who
writes the Instapaper app?
http://www.marco.org/2011/08/13/instapaper-ios-device-and-version-stats-update
96% of the users of Instapaper are on iOS 4.2 or better.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Nov 25, 2
We've never required folks to sign a CLA for the plugins repo. In some
cases I can definitely see where we might want this.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> I'm curious if we use a CLA for contributions to the phonegap-plugi
Hey,
I just opened this pull request:
https://github.com/callback/callback-android/pull/46
to remove the WebViewReflect class from callback-android. It doesn't
appear that we require it anymore. Please let me know by Wednesday if
you have any problems with this pull request. If not I will merge
Hey all,
For the upcoming 1.3 release can we throw down a few dates? Our last
release, 1.2, was tagged and released the same day. I can't say for certain
but I'm guessing the rush was to get it out before the Adobe announcement
but we are lucky we didn't have major problems with that release as we
M, Michael Brooks wrote:
> I like it Simon.
>
> I'd suggest tagging as "1.3.0rc1" instead of "1.3.0_rc1"
>
> I would like to squeak in OS X support for BlackBerry. Should I have this
> completed by Monday December 5th or Monday December 12th?
>
> M
reciate you
> suggesting it for 1.3.0!
>
> Ken - There's a JIRA and GitHub ticket for the issue, so we can move the
> conversation there. I could use some help testing it once the patch is in
> place.
>
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Simon MacDonald
>
Hey Alex,
We are glad to have another developer on board and thanks for contributing
your code to the FileTransfer class. I know that adding the support to
download binary files had been on my to do list for awhile. Now that we've
merged your code into Android and iOS we can take a look at doing
B
and we can figure out the specific
> changes to the API, then after that we can create issues for the various
> platforms *as well as* for callback-js and the docs!
>
> On 11-12-05 8:11 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>
>>Hey Alex,
>>
>>We are glad to have
t this for BlackBerry. Are there any existing
> tests for this?
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>> Basically it adds a download method to the FileTransfer object. It is
>> now available on Android/iOS but needs to get to BB/WP7/Docs bef
Hey all,
I've just opened a bug on Android in response to a message on the
mailing list. I think we may be leaking sockets in CallbackServer. If
someone can look it over I would greatly appreciate it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-107
I'm off to NYC today and will not be able to get t
d a
> > look yet? If yes and/or no did you create a failing test/verification?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Simon MacDonald
> > wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I've just opened a bug on Android in response to a message
Windows Phone has been tagged
>>> https://github.com/callback/callback-windows-phone/tags
>>> However, It is tagged 1.3.rc1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj wrote:
>>>
>>>> + ... 1 ?
>>>>
>>>&
The following is how I'm approaching testing for the upcoming 1.3.0
release. Others can use it as a guideline and feel free to offer
improvements.
1) Run mobile-spec test suite using PhoneGap 1.2 and note the number
of passed test cases.
2) Run mobile-spec test suite using PhoneGap 1.3 and compare
ceOrientation (which are equivalent, for the two Portraits and two
> Landscape orientations)
> * Fixed callback/callback-ios#22 - Removed unused DetectPhoneNumber and
> EnableAcceleration values in PhoneGap.plist
> * Fixed CB-96 PGWhitelist does not handle IPv4 host addresses with
>
gt;> after the position is received.
>>> * Don't force an orientation change unless the current orientation is
>>> unsupported
>>> * Fixed callback/callback-ios#15 - Xcode 3.2.6 Linker error when Build for
>>> Active Architecture Only = YES
>>> * Fixed callback/callbac
ack-test in a phonegap
> wrapper and testing with one application.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On 11-12-13 7:24 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>
>>The following is how I'm approaching testing for the upcoming 1.3.0
>>release. Others can use it as a guideline and feel fr
-13 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>
>>That's such a good idea that Bryce already did it. He added a bunch of
>>manual test cases to mobile-spec which is now callback/callback-test.
>>When you pull that code and put it into the www directory of your app
>>y
I'm with Drew on this one. PhoneGap 1.3 should be at least as good as 1.2.
If we've identified areas where we've regressed they should be fixed before
we ship 1.3.
Simon
On Dec 14, 2011 7:42 PM, "Drew Walters" wrote:
> What I am pointing out is regressions in the smartphone implementation
> beca
Us IBM'ers had to do both the CCLA (already on file with Apache) and
then submit ICLA's for working on Cordova.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Ken Wallis wrote:
> Many companies (cough, eg. Rim) include in their employment contract that all
> wor
+1 to callback-js
I'd also love for us to set aside some time to review the Media class which
is not normalized.
Native menus
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Filip Maj wrote:
> You meant 1.4 planning ya ?
>
> And yeah callback-js being shimmed in
and symbiam. If
> they all get tagged before Monday, that will give me time to package early
> and make sure we release 10am PST Monday morning.
>
> -Steve
>
> On 11-12-16 10:25 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>
> >Steve will be building the packages on Monday.
I will add some battery tests into mobile spec on Monday. I can't believe I
didn't think of that as I was running through the battery tests on Android
last week.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Becky Gibson wrote:
> callback-iOS is tagged.
>
> I als
Just pushed some battery tests up to mobile spec. Sadly, not much I can do
in the way of automation but it is a start.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Simon MacDonald
wrote:
> I will add some battery tests into mobile spec on Monday. I ca
Hey Oliver,
If you've signed the contributors agreement then we can accept code from
you. Michael Brooks did a write up on the wiki about how to contribute to
docs but you can substitute your favourite platform wherever you see docs.
http://wiki.phonegap.com/w/page/28618504/Git%3A%20Contributor%2
gt; On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Oliver,
>>
>> If you've signed the contributors agreement then we can accept code from
>> you. Michael Brooks did a write up on the wiki about how to contribute to
>> docs but you c
I've been able to setup and build cordova-android. Wondering the same
thing as Bryce, how do we handle pull requests, etc?
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Bryce Curtis wrote:
> I was able to set up git and clone, so Android must be good. Are we rea
+1 to getting the mails out of the -dev list. Maybe when cordova-dev
is setup we can fix it.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> Does anyone actually LIKE having JIRA emails sent to the -dev mailing list?
> I find it ... noisy
We are trying to figure it all out. Commit to the github site for now
and we can push to the Apache site. Please bear with us as we continue
to have growing pains.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Viras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks - so even when I signed
I prefer the robot as well.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Yohei Shimomae wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> So I got two designs to show for now.
>
> The first one borrows Patrick's street sign idea:
> http://cl.ly/3a0C3O0S3E3L3K0R2P3f
> I looked at pics of
Hey Joe,
I've been spending some time today testing your changes and it looks
good for the most part. The only areas that I seem to be having issues
with are:
1) Splash screen
2) Back button
1) I believe you posted the splash screen would have to be re-worked
with the new approach.
2) The back
ll see the problem.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> The back button issues should be resolved. Please pull down the changes
> again.
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Simon MacDonal
I will address the problem off this thread as this really isn't the place.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ray Camden wrote:
> Sorry to clutter this thread with a bug report, but Filip, I'm finding this
> isn't working at all:
>
> https://groups.g
+1
"Having to keep a github/cordova repo up-to-date seems like a huge waste of
time for me." PM
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 14:02, Filip Maj wrote:
>
>> So it's time to do something with the tw
Fine with me.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Friday is fine for me
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Michael Brooks
> wrote:
>> Friday is fine for me, but I am unavailable between 11:30am-12:00pm PST.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Mo
2 09:06:45
>>>>To:
>>>>Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>Subject: Re: 1.4 release phone call
>>>>
>>>>Friday works for me, as well.
>>>>-becky
>>>>
>>>>On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:22 PM,
Yeah, as Drew said at one point in time what was implemented was the
state of the art in Battery API specification. I love Drew's
suggestion of implementing the new API while keeping the old one
around as deprecated.
I think the best way to handle the battery drain from constantly
monitoring the b
That's great news Joe. I had started looking into getting the
WebDriver working with PhoneGap back in December. Unfortunately, it
was horribly difficult to extend the WebDriver to take a PhoneGap
WebView. Looking at the stuff you were doing with CordovaView It
looked like it would be easier to exte
If we want, we can us a connect room which I believe has a 1800 number to
>>>call in. I'll look into setting it up.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>-Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Jan 18, 2012, at 7:06 AM, "Si
You just need to send a pull request from your branch to
phonegap/phonegap-plugins repo. I saw the post about a week ago and
thought it was great. Then lamented the fact that Android doesn't have
something similar.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, An
ust submitted a pull request... I had no idea that
> existed. I wish Android supported additional screens, but I couldn't dig
> up any details or devices that can handle more than one screen.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Trice
>
>
>
> On 1/19/12 9:24 AM, "Simon MacDonald&q
+1
On Jan 19, 2012 2:03 PM, "Shazron" wrote:
> If there are no objections - I'll set the status of the old
> phonegap-dev (on Google Groups) mailing list to "archived".
>
> This is what happens when that checkbox is checked:
>
> "Set the status of this group to be archived, inactive. Reject new
>
UPON FUTHER REVIEW...
Okay in the hour and a bit since our call ended I've researched the
new battery status API and did a quick implementation on Android and
here are the pros and cons:
Pros
* Implemented the latest Battery specification according to W3C.
Cons
* Code is constantly running in th
Hey Olivier,
We need a bit more context on this stack trace. In what situation does
this crash occur?
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Olivier Brand wrote:
> Not sure what is happening but I get this exception in my application:
>
> java.lang.Illeg
+1
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Please indicate your vote add Steve (stevengill97 at gmail.com) as a
committer.
>
> +1
>
--
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
Are we tagging 1.4.0rc1? Then is the plan to tag 1.4.0 on Monday if no show
stoppers are found?
Simon
On Jan 26, 2012 1:23 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote:
> woo
>
Android has been tagged 1.4.0rc1.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> That sounds about right. Tag 1.4.0 on Monday and release Tuesday.
>
> -Steve
>
> On 12-01-26 10:35 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>
Because sometimes there isn't enough coffee, I forgot to update the version
file so I delete and re-tagged the Android repo just now.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Simon MacDonald
wrote:
> Android has been tagged 1.4.0rc1.
>
> Si
Super good!
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> Hey
>
> After a few days of hacking, I have a partial fix for the bugs that we've
> been facing on WebKit on Android sent up to the list:
>
> https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/
Okay, I updated the Android repo with version 1.4.0 and tagged the change.
Steve, if you are reading this don't forget to pick up the new plugins.xml
file to put into the .zip download.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Simon MacDonald
ivier Brand wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Never got feedback on my pull req
>
>
> Olivier
>
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 13:11, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>
> > Okay, I updated the Android repo with version 1.4.0 and tagged the
> change.
> > Steve, if you are reading
This looks to be a totally new spec. Either that or everything that was in
the last spec has been dropped.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/84a2fb7b753b/network-api/index.html
>
> will backlog
I did a quick look at Android and we could duck punch window.close() so
that it does a navigator.app.exitApp(). That could be a good solution if we
can determine what if any affect it will have on jQuery apps. As much as we
all love to hate on jQuery a lot of our users are leveraging their jQuery
e
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj wrote:
>
> >*overrideBackButton* - Imma gonna take this out right now. This is a
> >legacy
> >piece of code. The proper way of doing this is to register an event
> >listener for the "backbuttton" event.
>
> Yeh in Cordova-js this is done in a "standard"
Yeah, just set one up Joe.
Simon
On Jan 31, 2012 3:39 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote:
> Hey
>
> I've been working on the refactoring of Cordova for Android for a while
> now, and after a code review that we did, I managed to get it mostly
> up-to-date. This unfortunately involved some nasty merges in s
Hey Joe,
What tests fail on Contacts for you? When I ran the automated tests in
mobile spec against the 1.4.0.4c1 tag 88 of 88 automated tests passed. As
well, when I ran the manual contact tests in mobile spec they pass as well.
One of the bugs fixed in 1.4.0 allows you to add a contact to the ph
Android tagged 1.4.1.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Steve wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Bug has been fixed, I am going to package up 1.4.1. I need people to tag
> their repos again. I haven't got my committer status yet or not I would do
> it.
>
> -Steve
You can see the Android rename at:
https://github.com/macdonst/cordova-android/tree/rename
so far it looks good. I've run through the mobile spec app and the
automated tests pass at the same rate and the manual tests are fine as
well. I will run though some real device testing tomorrow.
The one
As long as we don't accidentally nuke phonegap/phonegap-plugins then
I'm happy to see the rest go away.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> github.com/phonegap
> github.com/callback
> github.com/cordova
>
> ugh
>
> I think we agree
hould
> wait until the unified js is merged into the respective projects to
> see just how that effects things. (eg: cordova.js)
>
> re android /bin: I'll hit that.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>> You can see the Android renam
hat commit and I'll start testing trmw.
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>> Well I think my branch is ready to go in now. Testing has gone well
>> and I'd prefer to get this into the repo earlier rather than later in
>> order to sha
deprecation notices? I
>> forget if we discussed this on the list already...
>> On Feb 2, 2012 9:25 PM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>>
>>> I will probably do a little more testing tomorrow with the tablet then
>>> push the commit. Should probably be done
'll start testing trmw.
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>> Well I think my branch is ready to go in now. Testing has gone well
>> and I'd prefer to get this into the repo earlier rather than later in
>> order to shake out any iss
; well till I hit the JSON classes which throw JSON exceptions from the
> constructors, thereby screwing me.
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>
>> Commited:
>>
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.gi
2 at 11:26 AM, Simon MacDonald
wrote:
> Yeah, it would totally screw over phonegap-plugins. That's why I want
> to get confirmation on whether or not we can keep them around.
>
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:23 AM
com.phonegap.api is back now after a bit more testing was done.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.git;a=commit;h=d8d7c29afe78ae4408b7e95a7225515e2813e9f3
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Simon MacDonald
wrote
that I ran into. I'm
> willing to make the change and commit it if everyone's cool with that.
>
> Joe
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
>
> > com.phonegap.api is back now after a bit more testing was done.
> >
>
It seems to be on Android that it is returning the value in m/s*s. When my
device is resting on the desk the x and y values are close to 0 while the z
is close to 9.8. Depending on what Android device you have your
accelerometer may be more accurate or able to go up to a higher level of g.
So, it l
That is a pretty good explanation Ross thanks for posting it to the list.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 6 February 2012 23:02, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> > No problem, understandable. The exact thing I communicated to Tim
> > t
My Android 2.3.4 device fires "orientationchange" events. So it seems to be
fairly standard.
Did a vote thread ever get started?
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>
> totally vote thread
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Filip Ma
One of the things I noticed when reading over the unified JS repo is that
it had gotten rid of casting functions. This means that some code would
need to change on the Android Java side. I quickly prototyped these changes
at:
https://github.com/macdonst/cordova-android/commit/b774adb315d38ddd4c060
Pat found a bug. I fixed it.
https://github.com/macdonst/cordova-android/commit/03effaf724a4d4a84f6303ea0486e91a9c8e567f#diff-0
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> DO IT
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Simon
I'd say remove it as the other platforms do not provide sample plugins.
Simon
On Thursday, February 9, 2012, Drew Walters wrote:
> Is it worth keeping the sample plugin around in the BlackBerry source?
>
>
https://github.com/apache/incubator-cordova-blackberry-webworks/tree/master/template/plugi
Monday the 20th is President's Day in the US and Family Day in most of
Canada so not too many people will be working. I myself will be in a cabin
in the woods without electricity. Please say a prayer for me.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Brian LeRo
> >
> > >
> > >On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Shazron wrote:
> > >> Good luck Simon without Internet! I just checked - offices are closed
> > >> here in Adobe for President's Day. I'll be working though - taking
> > >> another day off
For the 1.5.0 release can we support .toURI() and .toURL()?
We'll mark toURI as deprecated and remove it in 1.6.0 or 1.7.0. What do you
think?
As for the FileError codes. Gr...why did they have to change them.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Bec
I'm off on vacation, in fact I'm already supposed to be gone, until
Tuesday. On Tuesday I'll be giving a presentation at a local collage.
Wednesday is meetings so I wouldn't be able to look at it until next
Thursday.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:52 PM, F
call will be in the connect room.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am going to record the meeting and post it in the mailing list for
>>>
>>> people who can't make it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Meeting is at 9:00am PST tomorrow. People outside of North Americ
hod copy from toURL -> toURI,
> add a console.log, tag for 1.5, done.
>
> As for updating the error codes - can we shelve that for 1.6?
>
> On 12-02-17 11:52 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>
> >For the 1.5.0 release can we support .toURI() and .toURL()?
> >
onald
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Drew Walters wrote:
> mimetype is not a parameter of toURL either though right?
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Simon MacDonald
> wrote:
> > Okay, I've just put a change that adds toURI back into the Entry class
> for
>
wrote:
> +1 to taking it out - not even exactly sure what it's there for
>
> "Users may supply mimeType in order to simulate the optional mime-type
> header associated with HTTP downloads."
>
> On 12-02-22 9:42 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>
> >I
Settings -> Applications -> Your App -> Clear
> Data.
>
> In hindsight I really should have posted about this switch on the mailing
> list - my apologies for that.
>
> I guess it's as good a time as any to discuss the switch and where each of
> TEMPORARY and PERSIST
on the list so we all know
> what's up?
>
> I believe we need to change them eventually. Now how do we go about doing
> this? A deprecation-style message and a clear roadmap / delivery with a
> specific release?
>
> On 12-02-22 11:50 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
>
> The main argument was that "Persistent" and "Temporary" are completely
> meaningless when your data always persists unless you have user
> intervention. Therefore, I'm using the definition of temporary as anything
> that we can't guarantee w
I can't find the page that has the problem. Can you post a link?
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tommy Williams wrote:
> The Contributor Workflow article on the Cordova wiki (linked to from the
> new Cordova website under "Want to Contribute?" link
Yeah, I saw that change too. I was wondering what the advantage of
returning an integer vs returning a FileError object?
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Drew Walters wrote:
> I've been working through the File API mobile-spec failures on
> BlackBer
you are partially right. I think the name should be blank for
> the root directory of the persistent storage. It definitely shouldn't say
> that it's persistent, that seems to be very wrong.
>
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Simon MacDonald <
> simon
I will not be tagging Android today. There are a few previously passing
test cases in mobile-spec that are now failing. Will tag once the problem
is resolved.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Steve Gill wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Lets tag 1.5.0rc1 today
d the cordova.android.js file and checked it in along with a
version bump for Android to 1.5.0rc1.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> Which test case?
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Simon MacDonald <
> simon.macdon...@gmail.co
gt; thoughts?
>
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
>
> > They shouldn't be able to read that directory anyway unless they rooted
> > their own phone. We just need to be able to handle the error that it
> > throws, I think.
> >
My own personal thoughts on the matter is when you have a public API like
we have with Cordova each release should be as good as the previous
release. That is, all existing features should continue to work. So things
where we are breaking all the plugins or changing the location of the root
file sy
But I guess the immediate question is do we want to make this change for
1.5 or publicize we are making the change for a future release? Does this
need to go with a vote?
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Filip Maj wrote:
> This is a good discussion
I don't believe it is used on Android at all.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Drew Walters wrote:
> As far as I can tell the method LocalFileSystem.isFileSystemRoot(path)
> is a carry over from the BlackBerry implementation and is not used by
> the
1 - 100 of 836 matches
Mail list logo
