The following was printed in ³Northern Junket², vol 3, no 11, March 1953.
It¹s humorous, insightful and very telling about the differences between
contra dances then and now (see tips #1 and #3). I¹ve read some pretty wild
stories about country¹ and barn dances in different parts of the US in the
>
> From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing
> Subject: [Callers] Changing on the last round for a partner swing
>
> Callers --
>
>
>
> So what do y'all think? What do you do? How you do think people like it?
There are some dances where you are placed far from your partner at the end
I sometimes change it. If there's already a partner swing close to
the end, then changing the end may just end up giving a partner swing
that's too long.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Bob Isaacs wrote:
>
> Come to think of it, there's one very good time a night to
For one, lots of people tend to not repeat partners during an evening.
I take a pass on that if there's no partner swing or it turns out to
be a mixer.
On a similar vein, if it's a dance where only the actives swing (or in
general when #1's have a different roll), make sure that everyone gets
a
Come to think of it, there's one very good time a night to change the ending (a
tip learned long ago from David Kirchner); the first dance of the evening.
This acts like an auxiliary sound check - if many dancers don't swing or look
confused, especially in the far corners of the hall, you're
I have wondered about this issue for years. I understand the value of
calling simple dances with no partner swing at venues such as one night
stands, or at a middle school where the kids might be too shy to enjoy
dancing with a partner of the opposite gender, but as a dancer it drives
me nuts.
As a dancer, I always enjoy it when the caller modifies to make a dance
end with a partner swing, but as a caller I think it might get boring if
I did that every time. It's the surprise element that appeals to the
dancers. When I'm choosing dances for the evening I usually try to make
the last
Hi All:
I'm one of those callers who often changes a contra to finish with a partner
swing, although for really good bands who know to finish with a flourish I'll
avoid that. But I never call the whole last time through and it bothers me
when others do it; that's just a bad case of caller
I also speak from limited calling experience (4 years, in Maine and more
recently Boston). I do give more programmatic weight to becket dances
towards the end of the halves, and occasionally i'll modify a B part that
already circles left to end with a partner swing.
(I take a fairly conservative
I'm assuming this discussion is about contra dances?
If there are folks who are "bored" with the "utter predictability" of a
partner swing at the end of a dance then I am perplexed as to what the heck
they are doing at a contra dance in the first place. Why not swing,
squares, or just about any
On 04/01/2012 04:23, Richard Mckeever wrote:
Many callers like to start calling again the last time - I don't see the reason
for that so I don't do it.
I think it's to remind the dancers that the caller (who dropped out the
calling many turns back) is still in charge and is the one who
As a dancer, I'm always a little disappointed when the dance doesn't
end with a swing, but especially when it ends with new neighbors.
Ladies chain to left hand star is quite disappointing. I'll even go
so far as to notice the caller isn't doing it and when I see her
signal for the last time
I've had dancers express to me their disinterest in hearing the caller's
voice at the end of the dance, regardless of how mellifluous that voice is
- their point was that the music told them the dance was ending. They
didn't need a caller to do that. So (in my very limited experience) I
choose to
13 matches
Mail list logo