Re: [Callers] Compensating for SharedWeight's Limitation re: Threads

Please don't leave, just ignore the thread. Or filter. You don't have to read every post. Laurie Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad On Friday, January 22, 2016, 1:52 PM, Karin Neils via Callers wrote: "There is not way to peace. Peace is the way." thanks Don

Re: [Callers] Compensating for SharedWeight's Limitation re: Threads

Jerome makes a great point here about the "Mute" capability, that's the easiest solution for a given thread within GMail. This might get you poking about and noticing there is also a "Block" option for a sender - I urge caution with that one. Because SharedWeight rewrites the sender address to

Re: [Callers] Compensating for SharedWeight's Limitation re: Threads

In addition to filtering, for those who use Gmail, there is a More button above your mail, which contains the choice "Mute." When you mute a conversation, new messages in the thread bypass your inbox unless your name is added specifically as a recipient.

Re: [Callers] Compensating for SharedWeight's Limitation re: Threads

"There is not way to peace. Peace is the way." thanks Don Karin On 1/22/2016 1:09 PM, Don Veino via Callers wrote: I'm sad to see several postings recently of folks considering leaving the Shared Weight list over issues regarding the volume or tone of postings on particular topics. I realize

[Callers] Compensating for SharedWeight's Limitation re: Threads

I'm sad to see several postings recently of folks considering leaving the Shared Weight list over issues regarding the volume or tone of postings on particular topics. I realize the following is a workaround for something others might want to fix culturally, but I hope it may assist someone on the