Ron Blechner wrote:
> Can the book have a digital version with embedded hyperlinks to relevant
> videos?
It sounds like a great idea, but I’m not sure it’s practical. We’ve been trying
to create a digital version of the contra book, but the call charts keep
blowing up. If anyone can suggest
Richard Hart wrote:
> How about an answer to the question, Can contra callers who don't sing call
> squares, if so, how?
The answer seems obvious to me, but that’s because I grew up with an eclectic
assortment of squares in various styles, some of which involve no singing at
all. Some square
Luke Donforth wrote:
I often wonder about pairing breaks with figures… there's some meta-level stuff
I'd like to hear unpacked.
Another meta-level thing; which squares do you want to stay square to phrasing
(besides singing), and when does it not matter?
A break-out of expected teaching and
How about an answer to the question, Can contra callers who don't sing call
squares, if so, how?
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Tony Parkes via Callers <
callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> [Posted to Shared Weight callers’ list and trad-dance-callers list,
> simultaneously but separately
Thanks for putting this out there.
A couple thoughts from someone who only occasionally puts a square in a
program.
I often wonder about pairing breaks with figures. So some quick index
system of this figure goes well with these breaks, avoid these breaks, etc.
There are some things I think
[Posted to Shared Weight callers' list and trad-dance-callers list,
simultaneously but separately so replies won't go to both lists]
This message is for those of you who call squares, or have thought you might
like to call squares. The rest of you may allow your attention to wander.
I'm
