Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-17 Thread Erik Hoffman via Callers
Though Banjos in Love, For Maxine & Brendan does fit the quality of "Contra-like", it's not the easiest dance in the world. But it does have its own intro/break: Banjos in Love, for Maxine and Brendan Quadrille Intro, Break, End A1 Head women chain right; Same four half hey A2

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-17 Thread Tom Hinds via Callers
Erik, I really like the break and figure you sent! Is the promenade in the figure about 3/4 of the way around? When you say it's "not the easiest in the world" do you think it's better for an all experienced crowd? Tom

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-17 Thread Tom Hinds via Callers
There are many reasons some contra dancers don't like squares. One is that they take a long time to teach. For some squares it's a good idea to walk through the figure for both the heads and sides. Depending on the caller and dancers a full length break may be taught as well. When I

[Callers] Gender is a construct, Do-si-do

2016-10-17 Thread Tim Klein via Callers
The next time we get into a gents/ladies, lead/follow, jets/rubies debate, someone needs to remember to pull this one out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUKR4FpChcc Tim KleinKnoxville, TN

Re: [Callers] Is Pony Fun Unique?

2016-10-17 Thread Don Veino via Callers
You mean in public, I'm sure - that's TBD. Mom and Dad have been able to enjoy her "calling" at home for quite some time now. :) BTW, she's ambidanceterous, taking either role when we dance together at public events - which blows a few minds fairly frequently ("Huh? A tiny girl coming at me as a

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-17 Thread Martha Wild via Callers
I don’t dislike squares. But I hesitate to call them unless there are only four or maybe 8 couples left at the end of the dance for a number of reasons - one being the large teaching to dancing ratio in general as mentioned below, another being the fact that you can have two - seven people who

[Callers] Contra Friendly Squares -- people left over.

2016-10-17 Thread Richard Hopkins via Callers
Over the past several years, we have had several ‘extra’ dances here in Tallahassee that are advertised to the contra dance listserv and elsewhere as old-time or square dances, or old time square dances, with live music. We have had anywhere from 8 to 30 dancers come. One of the things we

Re: [Callers] Gender is a construct, Do-si-do

2016-10-17 Thread Jeremy Gmail via Callers
It raises some interesting points that go to the heart of discrimination. The reality is that you will always discriminate, and trying to eliminate discrimination doesn't work. What does work is moving towards a less discriminatory approach. Tackle the big ones, and then move on to the

Re: [Callers] Ralph Page Style

2016-10-17 Thread via Callers
Hi Neal, Just a note: Many of the "chestnuts" have been modified from their original form (By Ralph Page, Ted Senela and others) to be more reflective of the modern era. Chorus Jig, Rory-O- More, Hulls Victory, did not feature swings, as originally written, and they (actually) dance with their

Re: [Callers] Ralph Page Style

2016-10-17 Thread Neal Schlein via Callers
Thanks for pointing that out! I was aware of the fact but didn't think of it here. The older New England swings also would have been 2-hand swings, which lend themselves to a different choreographic flow--for example, swinging and casting down the outside. Not a very nice transition from a

Re: [Callers] Ralph Page Style

2016-10-17 Thread Winston, Alan P. via Callers
On 10/17/2016 3:26 PM, Neal Schlein via Callers wrote: Thanks for pointing that out! I was aware of the fact but didn't think of it here. The older New England swings also would have been 2-hand swings, which lend themselves to a different choreographic flow--for example, swinging and

Re: [Callers] Ralph Page Style

2016-10-17 Thread Richard Fischer via Callers
It's good to be reminded that "swing" had various meanings. I'm pretty sure I've seen "Swing all four" in old dance instructions for what we would call "Circle to the left". About Chorus Jig, I seem to remember that Ralph Page wrote in one of his books (around 1950?) that he didn't like the

[Callers] Pre-existing dance?

2016-10-17 Thread Luke Donforth via Callers
Hello all, I was thinking about what I do at the "welcome to our contra dance" introduction, and what dance would easily move in to that. Noodling around with moves, I thought of a sequence with glossary moves, but I didn't have it in my box. Anyone recognize it? Improper A1 --- (8)

Re: [Callers] Pre-existing dance?

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Barraclough via Callers
I have that exact dance as To Wedded Bliss by Mark Goodwin (2014). I use that in my Lesson and then, after teaching ladies chain and right & left through, follow that with my dance The Lesson (2009) which is > A1 --- > (8) Neighbor Do-si-do > (8) Neighbor swing > A2 --- > (8) >

Re: [Callers] Ralph Page Style

2016-10-17 Thread Neal Schlein via Callers
Richard, I also recall reading that comment about Page's opinion on Chorus Jig--I think it was in A Time to Dance, but might have been in Shadrack's Delight. I find a ball room swing that ends facing up and casting down the outside > (one’s own side) a lot of fun - but perhaps you mean if you end

Re: [Callers] Is Pony Fun Unique?

2016-10-17 Thread Don Veino via Callers
BTW, an assumed/implied *while* action in the A1 was not shown the first time around. It's spelled out below. Best, Don Pony Fun - DI - Raeden Veino 20161012 A1 Star Left Neighbor Allemande Left 1x Gents start Hands-Across Star Right (1/4x) *while* Ladies continue with their Allemande momentum