Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-27 Thread Marv Soloff
Matt Mengel wrote: A couple of things: 1) Mine already has the f/4.5 (bully for me) 2) Thanks for the 120 upgrade 3) Did you all know that some of these models had the capability of changing formats? On mine the whole back comes off (check the left hinge looking from the back),

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-27 Thread Marv Soloff
Robert Stoddard wrote: Hi Marv, This lens must be from another, slightly earlier Kodak camera, right? Maybe a Monitor or a Vigilant? By the time of the Tourist, they had renamed the triplet lenses Anastons, although without changing them, I believe. RKS Robert: Probably - although I

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-26 Thread Marv Soloff
Robert Stoddard wrote: Marv, Please let us know which lens is on your Tourist when you report your results. Also, what is the diameter of the tubing you used to enlarge the centering spindles for 120, and where did you get it? RKS Robert: If I am reading my micrometer correctly, (its

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-26 Thread Matt Mengel
A couple of things: 1) Mine already has the f/4.5 (bully for me) 2) Thanks for the 120 upgrade 3) Did you all know that some of these models had the capability of changing formats? On mine the whole back comes off (check the left hinge looking from the back), and a different back and mask for

[Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread Marv Soloff
Just a couple of thoughts about modifying the old Kodak Tourist 6 x 9 folding cameras: 1. There is enough room in the filmbays to step up this camera to 120 rollfilm. Eight cast centering ridges (two sets top, two sets bottom) need to be shaved off flush with the body casting. 2. The wind key

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread Gene Johnson
Marv, I've done just what you're doing. Mine is the coated 3 element Anaston in the Kodamatic shutter and works amazingly well. Find a lens shade! Flares pretty badly into the sun. You're right, it's a lot of camera for the money. Looks nice too. Gene Marv Soloff wrote: Just a couple of

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread Marv Soloff
Gene Johnson wrote: Marv, I've done just what you're doing. Mine is the coated 3 element Anaston in the Kodamatic shutter and works amazingly well. Find a lens shade! Flares pretty badly into the sun. You're right, it's a lot of camera for the money. Looks nice too. Gene Gene:

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread Robert Stoddard
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:34:12 -0500 Gene Johnson wrote: Marv, I've done just what you're doing. Mine is the coated 3 element Anaston in the Kodamatic shutter and works amazingly well. Find a lens shade! Flares pretty

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread Gene Johnson
Marv, That's a hoot! I used the brass tube from the hobby store. Epoxied it on! Well, if nothing else I can tell you your plan will work. f16 is pretty sharp, f4.5 nice for partraits. You'll be pleasantly surprised, I think. It's no Medalist Ektar, though. Gene Marv Soloff wrote: Gene

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread Marv Soloff
Robert Stoddard wrote: Marv, Please let us know which lens is on your Tourist when you report your results. Also, what is the diameter of the tubing you used to enlarge the centering spindles for 120, and where did you get it? RKS Robert: The lens is the 105mm f/4.5 Kodak

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread TSHACK
About a year ago, in a hobby shop, I saw an assortment of brass and aluminum tubing put out by a firm called KS. This was a large handfull of shorts 4 - 6 long in a plastic bag. I think I paid less than $5.00 for the bag. AFIK, this is a standard product from KS and should be available

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread Marv Soloff
Gene Johnson wrote: Marv, One thing I should coution you about is keeping the take up spindle assembled with the one way device. If you let the little springs and rollers out, it can be a devil getting them back in. Otherwise not bad. Gene: Been there - done that. I did not take

Re: [Cameramakers] Kodak Tourist (6x9) Conversions

2001-11-25 Thread Marv Soloff
TSHACK wrote: About a year ago, in a hobby shop, I saw an assortment of brass and aluminum tubing put out by a firm called KS. This was a large handfull of shorts 4 - 6 long in a plastic bag. I think I paid less than $5.00 for the bag. AFIK, this is a standard product from KS and