Greetings,
For those interested in OCaml in mobile environments, I wanted to
mention (or brag, maybe) that a second software house has released an
OCaml iOS app in the App Store:
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/seaiq-usa/id517425381?mt=8
SEAiq USA is an iPad app for navigating in the waters
Greetings,
I tried your solution for ocaml on Xcode 4.2 with iOS 5.0
But I can't find a way to get a good binary. I got some weird alignment
warnings
on compilation and the application just doesn't work on the iPhone.
Do you have plan to update your work for the last versions of Xcode and
Christophe:
I tried your solution for ocaml on Xcode 4.2 with iOS 5.0 But I
can't find a way to get a good binary. I got some weird
alignment warnings on compilation and the application just
doesn't work on the iPhone.
One extra comment occurred to me:
We're doing development under Xcode
sashan sas...@zenskg.net writes:
I'd be happy to hear from anybody interested in OCaml on iOS.
Thanks for this - will endeavour to look more closely into it.
I'm curious as to whether Apple would approve an app written in OCaml
for the app store. I was under the impression that they
]: http://psellos.com/ocaml/lablgles-build.html
[2]: http://psellos.com/ocaml/example-app-icosablue.html
[3]: http://psellos.com/ocaml/
[4]: http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/soft/olabl/lablgl.html
I'd be happy to hear from anybody interested in OCaml on iOS.
Jeffrey Scofield
jeff...@psellos.com
Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com writes:
But isn't this 'f(g(), x)' issue the same as the classic example
of undefined behaviour with f(++i, ++i)?
It's not quite the same, because a function call (g())
introduces a sequence point. In the f(++i, ++i) case,
I think there's only a sequence point
Gerd Stolpmann i...@gerd-stolpmann.de writes:
I don't know for SML, but OCaml also leaves the order unspecified in
which function arguments are evaluated (and ocamlc and ocamlopt behave
even differently in this respect). So I think the problem would
translate to OCaml in some form.
This is a
