On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:05:25PM +0100, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
Well, no real obstacle as OCaml-Java showed.
However, OCaml-Java 1.x is still a bare proof of concept due to both
poor design choices and JVM limitations. But then came Java 1.7 and
some limitations were removed (e. g. a garbage
Thank you Xavier and Johan for the replies.
2012/3/9 fo...@x9c.fr fo...@x9c.fr
Le 9 mars 2012 à 18:45, Johan Grande a écrit :
Le 09/03/2012 18:12, Philippe Veber a écrit :
Dear camlers,
I used js_of_ocaml several times and was really stunned of how clever
(notably because writing
Dear camlers,
I used js_of_ocaml several times and was really stunned of how clever
(notably because writing interfaces boils down to writing types) and
efficient this approach is. Would a similar thing work for the JVM, that is
a compiler from ocaml bytecode to java bytecode? I guess it wouldn't
Le 09/03/2012 18:12, Philippe Veber a écrit :
Dear camlers,
I used js_of_ocaml several times and was really stunned of how clever
(notably because writing interfaces boils down to writing types) and
efficient this approach is. Would a similar thing work for the JVM, that
is a compiler from ocaml
