On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Alain Frisch alain.fri...@lexifi.com wrote:
If you're under Windows, you might be interested in the CSML tool. It allows
you to build quite easily your own binding to .Net libraries. The CSML
distribution contains an example of a mini-binding to Windows Forms;
martindeme...@gmail.com :
Anything other than lablgtk2
I am affraid there is no.
--
Architecte Informatique :
Administration Systeme, Recherche Developpement
+261 34 56 000 19
Thanassis Tsiodras wrote:
I apologize beforehand if this is not the forum to ask.
I am on the fence about whether to learn OCaml or not, and while reading
an article called Why OCaml
(http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Software/Ocaml/why_ocaml.html), I saw that
OCaml was praised for the speed of
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:50:15 +, Isaac Gouy wrote:
Jeff Meister nanaki at gmail.com writes:
We know what your rules are for binary-trees; repeating them does
not help.
When Christophe TROESTLER wrongly states - OCaml is not authorized
to make use of its very own library! - he shows
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Christophe Troestler
christophe.troestler+oc...@umh.ac.bechristophe.troestler%2boc...@umh.ac.be
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:50:15 +, Isaac Gouy wrote:
Jeff Meister nanaki at gmail.com writes:
We know what your rules are for binary-trees;
On 11/24/2010 03:33 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Jacques Garrigue
garri...@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp wrote:
I'm not sure which examples you looked at for lablgtk2.
The goals of lablgtk are:
* be as close as possible to the spirit of Gtk+
* while providing type and
Hi Thanassis,
Le 22 nov. 10 à 14:21, Thanassis Tsiodras a écrit :
I apologize beforehand if this is not the forum to ask.
(...)
Is it just hype, then? Or am I missing something?
may we know, after all this intense discussion, what is your feeling?
Did this debate enlightened your views?
[We apologize for multiple copies]
Second Call for Papers and Workshops
DisCoTec 2011
6th International Federated Conferences on
Distributed Computing
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Vincent Aravantinos
vincent.aravanti...@gmail.com wrote:
may we know, after all this intense discussion, what is your feeling?
Well... (ducks, wears helmet).
Dr Jon Harrop communicated with me directly (two days ago)... and when
I expressed my lack of faith
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net wrote:
On 11/24/2010 03:33 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Jacques Garrigue
garri...@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp wrote:
I'm not sure which examples you looked at for lablgtk2.
The goals of lablgtk are:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Martin DeMello martindeme...@gmail.com wrote:
I was surprised not to see much interest in GUI DSLs in OCaml.
It's not complete or a full-blown DSL, but I started a small Gtk-light
module a while ago. I haven't had the time to complete it, but it
shouldn't be
Le 24 nov. 10 à 16:30, Thanassis Tsiodras a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Vincent Aravantinos
vincent.aravanti...@gmail.com wrote:
may we know, after all this intense discussion, what is your feeling?
Well... (ducks, wears helmet).
Dr Jon Harrop communicated with me directly
Hello,
Here is a temptative of automated GC tweaking.
It mainly tries to guess a minor_heap_size that will both increase speed and
reactivity !!!
It has a description in it ! It also move to a proportional increment of
major_heap instead
of a constant one, but this is not very usefull in my
And with the attached file !!!
--
Christophe Raffalli
Universite de Savoie
Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21
73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex
tel: (33) 4 79 75 81 03
fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42
mail: christophe.raffa...@univ-savoie.fr
www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI
Hello,
Here is a test of gctweak.ml on the now famous binary-tree shootout bench ...
As you can see it is a 30% speed up which is not too bad, just adding
a file on the compilation command line !
I reattached the file, because I correct a few comments in it ... and a syntax
error
that is only
Thanassis Tsiodras ttsiodras at gmail.com writes:
-snip-
However, when I actually went to the Language Shootout page suggested
in the article, I found out that OCaml is not 2nd, it is 13th, behind
languages like Haskell and C#...
Hey, guys.
Time to stop this, please.
Thanks,
David
On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote:
Ed Keith e_d_k at yahoo.com writes:
I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION
for them (which you
have been incapable of providing so far).
I feel no need to provide a
Isaac Gouy wrote:
David Allsopp dra-news at metastack.com writes:
-snip-
Reducing an entire programming language's strengths (or
weaknesses!) to a single number is just not really realistic - the
truth is more complex than one single-precision floating point
number (or even an array
On 11/24/2010 10:47 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
No, I'm on linux, but CSML does look very interesting. Does it work
well with Mono?
Yes, CSML itself has been adapted to work with Mono and I did a few
tests (some of screenshots show Windows Forms GUIs controlled by OCaml
code, under Linux with
Isaac Gouy wrote:
Ed Keith e_d_k at yahoo.com writes:
I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION
for them (which you
have been incapable of providing so far).
I feel no need to provide a JUSTIFICATION to you for anything.
Am I to interpret this to mean that
Gerd Stolpmann i...@gerd-stolpmann.de writes:
Am Dienstag, den 23.11.2010, 17:53 + schrieb Isaac Gouy:
Christophe TROESTLER Christophe.Troestler+ocaml at umh.ac.be writes:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:03:48 +, Isaac Gouy wrote:
C version : 12.11 secs
OCaml version : 47.22
On 24 November 2010 21:37, Alain Frisch alain.fri...@lexifi.com wrote:
Being able to write things like:
lazy let rec button1 =
button ~click:(fun () - button2 # disable) Button1
and button2 =
button ~click:(fun () - button1 # disable) Button2
in
...
As the lazy keyword suggests, we
22 matches
Mail list logo
