Re: Rack, Camping 2.0++

2008-05-22 Thread ironald
Camping.goes :Forward ___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Re: Rack, Camping 2.0++

2008-05-22 Thread _why
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 07:27:18AM +1930, Aníbal Rojas wrote: === 4. Renaming camping-unabridged.rb to camping.rb? === I haven't touched camping.rb at all, do we really need to prove that it's a micro-framework? It just makes development/releasing harder. Let's just forget about

Re: Rack, Camping 2.0++

2008-05-22 Thread Aria Stewart
On May 22, 2008, at 12:38 AM, _why wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:26:52PM +0200, Magnus Holm wrote: I've just finished rewriting Camping to use Rack in the core. I got rid of (a little less) than 1kB in camping.rb and removed lots of un- necessary files (lib/server/*.rb, fastcgi.rb

obfuscation Re: Rack, Camping 2.0++

2008-05-22 Thread Ernest Prabhakar
Hi Magnus, On May 22, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Magnus Holm wrote: I must agree that the obfuscation is really impressive (specially in a presentation where you can include the full source on one slide). I just don't like to touch it. And unfortunately it doesn't evolve by itself. I'm just tired

Re: Camping-list Digest, Vol 23, Issue 8

2008-05-22 Thread John Baylor
Removed 25% of the framework? Gosh, I wish _why wasn't so darn verbose... ___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list