Hi Magnus,
On May 22, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Magnus Holm wrote:
I must agree that the obfuscation is really impressive (specially in a
presentation where you can include the full source on one slide). I
just don't like
to touch it.
And unfortunately it doesn't evolve by itself.
I'm just tired of renaming camping-unabridged.rb to camping.rb in
order to test
the apps, and then back again when I commit stuff.
I'll be perfectly fine if someone else creates the obfuscated
version :-)
So, it sounds like there's a few options:
a) Automate the creation of the obfuscated version from the unabridged
version
b) Tweak the system to run from "camping-unabridged.rb" (or a short
name thereof, e.g. "campsrc")
c) Make the obfusc version "camping4k", and make camping-unabridged.rb
the default camping.rb
Any of those seem viable?
-- Ernie P.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:50 PM, _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 07:27:18AM +1930, Aníbal Rojas wrote:
===
4. Renaming camping-unabridged.rb to camping.rb?
===
I haven't touched camping.rb at all, do we really need to prove
that it's a
micro-framework? It just makes development/releasing harder.
Let's just forget
about the abridged version and rename camping-unabridged.rb to
camping.rb!
Keeping Camping away from the bloat goes far beyond an arbitrary
weight limit.
It is a nice way to promote Camping. It is catchy saying "In Less
then
4K", period.
Instead of saying the obfuscation "just makes development/releasing
harder,"
try saying obfuscation "just makes flippancy/esotericism easier."
_why
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
--
Magnus Holm
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
