BTW if you want to point a run.camping.io or host.camping.io or anything
you like to 66.116.108.12 will then be able to show an (hopefully) working
demo using the official domain ;)
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 7:08 AM, david costa wrote:
> oh sure ! for me is not a problem - love camping.io as a d
Here is my progress on the server :)
Spent several hours to try to work on a nginx + passenger setup on the
cloud even using some pre-made ami with no success. It was also fairly slow
vs. a real server (even on an XLarge instance).
So I went back to one spare brand new mac mini server quadcore i7
oh sure ! for me is not a problem - love camping.io as a domain !
first worry is to have a working system that is fairly stable and usable
albeit it might be launched as alpha/beta anyway :)
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Jenna Fox wrote:
> We can just use a *.camping.io catchall entry
>
>
>
We can just use a *.camping.io catchall entry
On 31/03/2012, at 3:30 PM, david costa wrote:
> Hello Jenna,
> we could use host.camping.io or anything.camping.io for the frontend but if
> the server has to allow users to create myfancyapp.camping.io it would be
> complicated as I would need to
Hello Jenna,
we could use host.camping.io or anything.camping.io for the frontend but if
the server has to allow users to create myfancyapp.camping.io it would be
complicated as I would need to run the camping.io DNS on the hosting server
to create the sub domains on the fly. I started working on i
Those both sound like brilliant servers! I'm not laughing at all. If my mac
mini is good enough for sky rim, it's good enough for web hosting for sure!
Can we just use camping.io?
I think starting simple is a good idea. Databases are pretty cool among web
developers for various reasons, but I t
Dropbox sounds like a great idea, except for if it starts syncing an sqlite db
constantly.
Another good option would be if we can make an nginx config (or a camping app!)
which does WebDAV - finder, explorer, and nautilus all support it, and it means
site upload bits and site serving bits bot
+9 this :)
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
david costa skrev:
Hello all,
I am opening a separate topic just to brainstorm the idea of a free, simple
camping deployment/hosting option.
Now this is not about re-inventing the wheel as heroku a
oops - should have put my last reply here... - DaveE
Hello all,
I am opening a separate topic just to brainstorm the idea of a free,
simple camping deployment/hosting option.
Now this is not about re-inventing the wheel as heroku already
supports camping apps too. So this would be the ground
Having just spent a whole afternoon: updating my sources in Debian
just to install curl just to install rvm and check rvm requirements...
[paused here and logged out of server] to find that I now have to add
my user to the rvm group (to find useradd -G rvm myusername
*fails*)... then instal
ah - was just stripping out the excess and responding to multiple
parts of multiple messages in email-style. Will revert to adding at
the top - DaveE :-)
Wow. We should really enforce some sort of top or bottom posting
policy on this mailing list. Preferably top because That's the
default
Hello all,
I am opening a separate topic just to brainstorm the idea of a free, simple
camping deployment/hosting option.
Now this is not about re-inventing the wheel as heroku already supports
camping apps too. So this would be the ground idea:
a) This would be entirely free - no paid plans to up
I agree with Dave that we have to go pretty much back to basic when is
about deployment. I have been running a free hosting for several years
(2001 to 2006 I think http://dotgeek.org) and I think that many programmers
get lost in running thins in reverse proxy which, as far as I gather, is
gettin
Wow. We should really enforce some sort of top or bottom posting policy on this
mailing list. Preferably top because That's the default for most clients
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
Jenna Fox skrev:
Disable comments on youtube perhaps?
P.S. RE:
I'll go with unicorn then. Apparently it handles more requests/sec
than Thin. But that might be old benchmarks who knows.
Sounds great - my sites are the same setup, but with regular thin. :)
All I ask is that it avoids sentences such as this one (from Unicorn):
"Slow clients should only be
Disable comments on youtube perhaps?
P.S. RE: 'unicorn sounds nice' for those who haven't heard it yet, this is what
Unicorn sounds like: http://d.pr/olau
—
Jenna
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 1:20 AM, Dave Everitt wrote:
> > On 30 Mar 2012, at 14:51, david costa wrote:
> >
> > Vimeo is
Oh my bad but on a fresh install on mac this is what comes up. Perhaps that
is part of my rack configuration or what is default on rack. The idea is
that I think the "simple dumbest" build will launch the webserver with
thin(camping
--port 80). Nothing against Unicorn if is not a pain to install/co
On 30 Mar 2012, at 14:51, david costa wrote:
Vimeo is great (I use it for a lot of professional videos) but
perhaps we should have them on youtube too because google ranks
video from youtube higher on their searches.
YouTube: loads of trolls (-2) but lots of eyeballs (+1) = total: -1
Vimeo:
They're all really really fast. I like the idea of how unicorn works though -
it sounds quite nice. Apache for legacy stuff only these days. I wonder if
there are any server's with a logo as awesome as LLVM's.
—
Jenna
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 1:06 AM, Isak Andersson wrote:
> That's what
That's what I was suspecting. I'll go with unicorn then. Apparently it handles
more requests/sec than Thin. But that might be old benchmarks who knows.
Not that speed is everything. Stability etc is also important. But whatever.
There shouldn't be too much of a difference in setting them up anyw
Hello Jenna,
I totally agree in keeping it consistent hence I think we should use Comic
Zine for the webcast titles etc. Isak will be using that.
I don't think we will be using topstitch for now and I checked the license
is anyway reasonable (30$ on my font) but glad to know you got it free :)
When
So we should use the one in the Camping.io repository? Can I get that in
OpenType?
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
Jenna Fox skrev:
Quickly while we're on the topic of typefaces:
Our web design makes use of a typeface called Topstitch in the sideb
For screencasts I recommend whichever of the fashionable web servers has the
coolest looking logo when zoomed out a bit, as it'll look good on video.
Unicorn has a pretty great logo which scales well.
Who ever said ruby severs don't scale?
—
Jenna
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 12:55 AM, Je
I've never heard of that. Camping is a rack app. It works with any kind of rack
server. Thin is in no way official or standard. Use whatever you think is good!
There are so many ways to deploy ruby apps and nearly all of them are really
great. It's not worth fussing too much over unless you're m
Oh, thin is a standard in Camping? Never noticed.
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
david costa skrev:
For the deployment video I think you should perhaps start with the standard
configuration which has thin and nginx but of course if you have time you
Quickly while we're on the topic of typefaces:
Our web design makes use of a typeface called Topstitch in the sidebar
navigational menu. The type designer Typodermic donated a license to use this
typeface on our site, but it is a commercial font so should not be used outside
of official campi
For the deployment video I think you should perhaps start with the standard
configuration which has thin and nginx but of course if you have time you
can do one with Unicorn too. The idea is to make it easy for users to run
without having to install too much extra stuff.
Best Regards
David
On Fri,
This is good but let's use the same font as the website :)
http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/Comic-Zine-OT
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Isak Andersson wrote:
> ** I've heard nothing but good myself. The biggest difference is that
> Slim is a bit more "friendly" isn't it?
>
> And what did you
I've heard nothing but good myself. The biggest difference is that Slim is a
bit more "friendly" isn't it?
And what did you think about the image :)
- Isak
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
Jenna Fox skrev:
I've certainly heard nothing bad of Unicorn
I've certainly heard nothing bad of Unicorn from my friend who works in the
github server management team.
—
Jenna
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 6:12 PM, Isak Andersson wrote:
> Yeah, it's just a matter of preference I guess. I like both but I'm going
> with Unicorn :)
>
> Also, I guess I s
Yeah, it's just a matter of preference I guess. I like both but I'm
going with Unicorn :)
Also, I guess I should ask the whole mailing list on this, I created a
little base thing for
presentations when I'm just talking concepts in the screencasts. I took
some assets
from the Camping.io site to
31 matches
Mail list logo
